From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Critique of Pure Reason
|
Score: 9
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 10
|
 For. It's time this got featured. Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)- For Because I wrote it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- very for — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. I agree. --monika 23:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delicious For Eggs are just wonderful. --Greyweasel 08:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kunt.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  22:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Yes. It's time. --UU - natter
 12:17, Sep 11
- For. It's strange how uncyclopedia changes so that some things become more popular. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- In my almighty power, I have deemed this article worthy of a FOR! *GOD*
- For. A- in a class all about that book. Yes, I see you're impressed. Le Cejak • <15:58, 13 Sep 2008>
|
Against: 1
|
- Against - Before you ask, I'm not working for the Humean empiricists. See comments. --Knucmo2 10:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I must commend you on managing to make Kant funny, having done a whole semester on him, I didn't see the funny side. But I did not really find it funny enough to feature, and I am not at all averse to having clever, philosophical articles featured, so long as they make me laugh a fair bit. --Knucmo2 10:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain I find satire of philosophy just as baffling as actual philosophy. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. It's time this got featured. 
