From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Poetry
|
Score: 12.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
EMC [TALK] 02:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 12.5
|
- Self-nom and for. I spent a lot of time and effort reworking this article. I hope it paid off. --EMC [TALK] 02:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Quite. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:55, Jan 13
- For. 189.61.249.205 17:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)- Emphatic For. Excellent. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 15:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I like this piece/so increase the score/then place my sig/and my vote, which is for. (Oh dear) --UU - natter
 16:33, Jan 16
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  20:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- For author did some clean up, which got rid of some of the rambling. --Mnbvcxz 05:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- For --Docile hippopotamus 03:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Hmm, thought I voted on this already... Where are my slippers? MrN
 14:56, Jan 25
- 4 --PCgamerMofo 19:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. even ex-cons can get ahead in life! Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
Against Very funny in some parts but didn't grab me in the way some articles have. Seemed to ramble on in some sections and became unfunny. Shortening it may help. --Tagstit 02:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
#Weak Against Its been improved, but it still has look much ugliness and random poems for a featured article. Its not that bad to read, but its appearance is bad. --Mnbvcxz 05:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Looking at some of the edits since I voted on this, I think it's improving. However, I still stand by my against vote at the moment, although its more of a hesitant against than a weak against. It still a bit too rambling. --Mnbvcxz 04:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For.--
