Uncyclopedia:VFH/Peyton Manning

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Peyton Manning (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Peyton Manning	Score: 14.5 bullshit fuckin' playoff losses
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 17.5	Self-Nom & For. After what might quite possibly be the shortest wait for a Pee review ever (I put it up, and it was reviewed when I next went to the page; awesome), I decided to nominate this to see how it fares. The Pee Review was very positive, despite professing that Tom Brady was in fact better than Peyton Manning, which is totally untrue. In any event, vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For Thanks for the thumsbs up on the review, Guildy! I really enjoyed this article, it was really funny. Therefore, I give it a for. Staircase (aka: "Steps") 02:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For. I don't watch football, and this made me laugh- nice work. Also, thanks for writing an article on someone people have heard of. Saberwolf116 03:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)  For. . Now I know all I need to know about American Football. Dame 09:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Weak for. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:48, May 26 For Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 17:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Yes! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Yup, even though I hate both Manning and Brady.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 00:51, 27 May 2009 Oh, dear god, Guildy, thank you. I am an avid Colts fan, and every word in this article is not only hilarious, but true. Thanks. You fucking rule. --LongLiverh3 02:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC) (UTC) I, too, am an avid Colts fan. Two words: Donald Brown. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 07:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC) For. The first article in weeks I laugh out loud at the first sentence, including any of my own. This is the highest praise I can give. Style  Guide 07:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC) For. per above Mnb'z 18:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) For. I know nothing about this. That's how good it is --Asahatter (annoy) 22:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Great And it reminds me of the old days where Guildy and I were just taking our baby steps on this site and arguing over his Tom Brady article.    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   02:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC) I'm actually planning on rewriting that fairly soon. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC) For. IronLung 07:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC) For. - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 11:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) For. Tom Brady sucks. --72.88.105.73 16:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC) For. Once, when I was a kid, I came up with the idea for this article. I wrote something that was okay, but it got sucked up by others. THIS is GREAT. Much better than it was when I wrote it.--<<>> 23:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC) For. While I don't like the fact that it confuses writing and talking, I still enjoyed the concept. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  21:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	token pointless against. hmmm...i've never voted against an article with this much support based on the fact that i didn't like it. also: go pats! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC) Against. It just didn't make me laugh. Nameable ((talk?)) 15:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)  Against. . I read it and I can see that idea was the piece is written by a fan. Trouble is that to 'write it like a fan' is a hard one to pull off as they are usually madder in an unconscious sort of way which is difficult to parody. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I should add I don't give a flying fuck about watching any sports - I would give two for- votes if I had a sockpuppet. Style  Guide 07:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Guildy I actually didn't like the Donald Brown pick. I wanted Peria Jerry. Or maybe Quan Cosby. --LongLiverh3 21:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain.. Sorry Guildy, I just can't bring myself to vote at all. Fucking Peyton Manning Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:20,5June,2009 22:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.