Uncyclopedia:VFH/Gay Jesus (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Gay Jesus (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Gay Jesus	Score: 1.5 people who think the time has come
Nominated by:	Aleister
For: 10	Nom&for&twistythumbs up Just thinking that maybe the time has come for DrStrange's masterwork to see the light of daze. Imnho should have been featured long long ago in all lands and timezones. Aleister 16:40 22 11  For. This should've been featured last time this was nommed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:43, 22 November 2010  For. Ah, hells... snrk. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 19:00 (UTC)  ... Aw, why the hell not? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:49, November 22, 2010 (UTC) Minty. I found it to be humorous. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 20:19,22November,2010  For. THough I assumed i'd hate it from the title. --Sog1970 23:19, November 22, 2010 (UTC)  For. Eternal punishment is accruing in my personal account with the Bank of God, on a daily basis, as long as this article exists. Just read the talk page. --    00:02, November 23, 2010 (UTC) For. M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 17:31, November 23, 2010 (UTC) For. OK. I first thought something more biting could have been written - but when I read the talk page - loosely - and got to the point where Modus takes a righteous stand, I completely caved in. The idea of the article may not be the best ever, but bits and parts save the whole thing. Style  Guide 07:51, November 24, 2010 (UTC) For Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 20:00, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 8.5	gay --121.214.144.116 06:05, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Against. Doesn't really do anything new. It's not really an article. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Where's the feces? I'm getting pretty sick of this Jesus stuff. --Roman Dog Bird 22:11, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Against. Jesus H. Christ! It seems like Jesus is Uncyclopedia’s favorate meme “whipping post”. I’m bored with it. It’s like, “how many ways can you insult Jesus?" - contest here. I'm not defending religion, but Jesus is a bigger meme than Chuck Norris. And this is just vulgar, with no redeeming value. I’d be ashamed to show this to my folks, or my kid, or my friends. I’d be ashamed if this was featured. It’s not even a real subject. Sorry. Funnybony    09:24, Nov 25 09:24, November 25, 2010 (UTC) It may surprise you - but Jesus is a bigger meme than Chuck elsewhere in the world too. Only the Beatles were bigger than Jesus. -- Style  Guide 12:15, November 27, 2010 (UTC) No they weren't. :P —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:26, 27 November 2010 Dude, you're equating a martial arts actor, born in the 1900's, with the figurehead of a religion that has lasted 2000 years. Do you really think that Chuck Norris jokes will be around in 50 years? Speaking of the devil, wouldn't an Uncyc article that is allegedly written first person by Chuck, which laments the overuse of his name in stupid jokes, get a shot at being featured or is it VERBOTEN because it involves Chuck Norris?? Apply the same principle to Jesus - that's not apples and oranges. "I mean honestly" <--Dr Evil Voice.--    13:19, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Um, you might want to be careful with all the stuff you say in an against vote, Funnybony. Well, ya know. Don't be too negative and stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:29, 25 November 2010 Apparently, there's either a Gay Jesus article, waiting to be written, which isn't vulgar - or - it is impossible to write an article about Gay Jesus without it being vulgar. See what I mean though? Some people look at this article and just go apeshit over it for whatever reason (which we can only guess about). I could accurately hack into the article's weaknesses but it won't look anything like the usual stuff hurled at it ;-) --    14:48, November 25, 2010 (UTC) Against. I blame the Mayflower RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:48, November 25, 2010 (UTC) Against. Jesii, LOL Mn-z 14:09, November 25, 2010 (UTC) Against. has the word gay may not be on the main page ® 13:53, November 27, 2010 (UTC) What decade are you from? --Roman Dog Bird 18:38, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Against. While I see the humour here I think the page is trying to do too much visually and that did effect my enjoyment of it somewhat. Funny? Yes, FA at the moment? I don't think so. ChiefjusticeXBox360 17:39, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Heavily Against. I can take religious humor despite my religious convictions. But having a kid preforming fellatio on Jesus is downright shameful and cheap no way! Dr. Fenwick 20:39, November 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Doc is right to point out the talk page, it is itself a masterpiece. So this nom is like a two-fer. It's the only talk page ever voted "Good" on Votes For Good (VFG). Amen. Aleister 00:18 23 11 Abstain. - I don't really see the article here - just a series of images.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:15, November 23, 2010 (UTC) The actual article would fit on a postage stamp. Kind of a stub really. The bulk of it constantly refers to itself ;-) --    17:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Comment. And don't shoot marihuana into your veins! Style  Guide 07:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Comment. Also - if this never gets featured, I suggest sporking and editing the talk page for a new article. Context? Dunno. Some argument I guess. Now the talk page is too long in my view. At least for the MTV generations. Style  Guide 08:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC) Comment. I really appreciate the support from those of you who won't let this one die. I believe it was originally a poo-lit article and it got two good scores and one ZERO by someone who went off on a rant about it - and it cost the article from placing. That same dynamic will not go away and that's why it'll never get featured. I accepted that a long time ago. IMO: Yes, the various Jesii are nothing new, yes the actual writing is sparse and focuses mostly on reactions to the subject instead of an actual article about the subject. It's image based too. That never stopped anything from getting featured. I can't think of anything resembling a legion of Jesii arguing about a new, gay addition to the clan and being humanly pissed off about people mocking Jesus. I used it as a metaphor for people's never ending versions of who the "real" Jesus is and what he would say. Hey, if it aint' funny then it should get your  Against. vote. That's all that matters IMO.--    00:20, November 25, 2010 (UTC) What separates this page from all other great Jesus pages is, to quote Doc's comment above, with added bolded and stand aloneness: I can't think of anything resembling a legion of Jesii arguing about a new, gay addition to the clan and being humanly pissed off about people mocking Jesus. I used it as a metaphor for people's never ending versions of who the "real" Jesus is and what he would say. Amen. Aleister 10:42 25 11 Talking about Jesus pages, I also like Christosaurus rex. I think it's really good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:04, 26 November 2010 And aren't you forgetting related to Jesus pages? Aleister 2:12 26 11 Oh yes, those are pretty sweet too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:15, 26 November 2010 So long, sweet Prince, we hardly knew ye. Sail well until next time, and when the words "For" or "Against" are heard on the wind, ignore, and persevere, and the land of milk and honey will open to you and your kin, aye. Aleister 20:04 27 11

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH