Forum:Hate speech article needs to be removed

Forums: Index > BHOP > Hate speech article needs to be removed

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4837 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

WARNING! This page contains profuse whining. Proceed with caution.

Avert thine eyes!

This page is extremely offensive and should not be viewed by anyone! (It may even be illegal in several countries as well.)

---

Please remove the article titled "Retard", this could be considered serious hate speech by many and the last thing I want is to see the site in trouble. Outstanding citizen 22:42, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

We appreciate your concern, but if we were going to get in trouble for anything, it would already have happened for much, much worse than that article. -RAHB 22:44, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

If you think that's offensive, boy oh boy are you going to love it here. --Andorin Kato 22:45, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

What an Outstanding citizen you really are! -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:48, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

One of my articles caused a complaint from Yogen Fruz. I didn't bat an eye. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 27 August 2011, at 23:43

Why don't you make the page better, instead of just complaining? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:52, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

No. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:07, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

"Outstanding" citizen, if you really think an article needs to go, throw it on VFD (though I would vote keep in this case) --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:00, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

This site is under American jurisdiction, meaning your Euro-Hippie Liberal Commie laws have no power here. He are only subject to American-Redneck Conservative Fascist laws, like the Patriot Act. --Mn-z 12:29, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Don't you mean "no power"? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:31, 28 August 2011

Maybe. --Mn-z 12:34, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Another person going to whine about shit like kitten huffing or assburgers syndrome again.What a star.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 12:37, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

And this: [1] --FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 12:42, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

I think we scared the original poster away. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:29, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

It's not our fault

The World's Smallest Monkey did it.

There's nothing we can do. We've been trampled under monkey power. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:17, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Because you have no intention of taking me seriously, I will take it upon myself to contact Wikia staff. Pages like "Nigger" will not be tolerated! Outstanding citizen 02:11, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Are you really that narrow-minded? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:14, 29 August 2011

I agree, it is not nearly racist enough, and since the wiki makes fun of rednecks and conservatives, we need more anti-black racism to counter-balance it. For example, "Niggers", instead of making fun of negroes, makes fun of (racist) American white people. --Mn-z 02:27, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Even so, use of such hate speech shall not be tolerated in a society that has worked so hard to obliterate it! Outstanding citizen 02:48, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Hate speech? What are you talking about? I love niggers! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:00, 29 August 2011

I am taking you seriously. I mean, seriously, if I wasn't would I mention The World's Smallest Monkey? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:58, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

I think you've confused us with Wikipedia

I assume this is what you're looking for. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 August 2011, at 02:44

I just talked with the Wikia staff

They said we have to take the page down or else face a large range of sanctions, some of which I've listed here:

1. Having our userpages painted in blackface.
2. Lynchings
3. Only getting half a vote when we vote for featured articles
4. Only being allowed to vote for featured articles if we own property
5. Lynchings
6. Wikia refers to all users as "boy" from now on
7. Wikia offers to give all users 40 acres and a mule but goes back on their word
8. Lynchings
9. Wikia forces all uncylopedia users to watch BET
10. Annnnd Lynchings

I'm pretty sure after seeing these potential sanctions that the article will get taken down. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:05, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

I will be sending this in as evidence for my abuse report on this website. Outstanding citizen 03:11, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Since you're sending an abuse report, add this: POOP POOP YOURE A RETARD LOLIOLOLOLOL!!!! -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 August 2011, at 03:53

It's our job to be irreverent. This is what we do. It's what we are. Rather than complain, I again say to you, why don't you go make that page better? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:16, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Wait, Wikia's going to make us watch BET? That would just be cruel and unusual! It also goes against some section of some old piece of paper that nobody cares about anymore! Of course, watching anything on cable is cruel and unusual these days... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 18:36 August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Haven't Seen Such Topics For A Long Time.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 08:16, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Tried whiteface yet? And I had never met a nice South African. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 10:31, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Here is a link you may be interested in

Ta-da. --Andorin Kato 03:20, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Why do people always confuse bad taste humor with hateful propaganda? I mean, movies with crass jokes gross millions of dollars at the box-office! --Scofield & 1337 12:00, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Because They Have A Crappy Sense Of Humor.I Have Friends that have parents That Mistake Crap As Profanity.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 12:15, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion

Perhaps, instead of forcing everyone to adopt your position on the subject, you (by which I mean OutstandingCitizen) could just not visit/read/look at/think about the pages that offend you in the first place? Eh? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:32, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

You've got a crusader here, Guildy. He's fighting for universal decency! At least he didn't see Gay Jesus.....--    17:43, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

I bet he's reading it and VFDing it as we speak :D -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 August 2011, at 17:45

Wow, look at this offensive Uncyclopedia article! That's so offensive! He should report that to Wikia immediately!--    17:55, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

You think that's offensive? Look at this Uncyclopedia article! This should be reported to Wikia right away! -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 August 2011, at 18:11

@Guildensternenstein: While I find Outstanding Citizen's whining amusing, what you said doesn't make sense. It's like those Youtube people who, when someone doesn't like a video, say "if you don't like it, don't watch it". The problem is, if you don't watch it, how do you know whether you like it or not? The same applies here. Schamschi, 19:47, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Well, there's a difference between "liking" something and finding it offensive. I'm sure someone like Outstanding Citizen would find articles like Gay Jesus and Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches offensive before having read them; ergo, he should not visit them, so as not to be offended. Simple, really. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:07, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure he hasn't read any of the articles. At most he might've stared blankly at the text for a couple minutes and failed to understand anything beyond its containment of words like "nigger" and "retard". —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:05, 30 August 2011

@Guildensternenstein: No, that would only be a guess. And, also, what you said can also be applied to "liking" something, where it would only be a guess, too. You can guess that you would find something offensive, or that you would not like it, but that doesn't mean you can say for sure. The articles you provided as examples conveniently have titles from which one might easily gather whether one is likely to find them offensive, which creates the impression that it's possible in general to identify an offensive article by its title. But this is not true, these titles were just special examples. What about Retard, or, if Socky is right and Outstanding citizen hasn't really read the article, Rape, where I believe there was some discussion going on some weeks ago on some blog, because someone found the article offensive. Or an article about a country or city, or a profession. You wouldn't know whether you find the article offensive before you read it, would you? So it's actually not that simple. Schamschi, 04:18, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe what Guildy meant was that the guy should avoid reading articles on Uncyclopedia as, given his peculiar standards for judging the offensiveness of content, he's likely to find a lot of them offensive. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:44, 31 August 2011

Look, This Video Will Explain To You Heathens What Is Wrong With That Racist Hate Speech

It's all about standards! --    19:15, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

"The uploader has not made this video availble in your country". Oh why must everyone hate Canada so much? -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 August 2011, at 19:17

They must know that it's not necessary in Canada, only in the savage states - which happen to be infested with wild Indians.--    19:26, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Canada smells like stale doughnuts and expired maple syrup. --ShabiDOO 21:02, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Chief Justice's User Page

This article really offends me, and I think that people who get offended by things like Cheif Justice's user page, will really get offended when they read Chief Justice's user page. For this reason, it should be taken down. I dont want people who don't like reading things like Cheif Justice's user page to get offended when they read Cheif Justice's user page. Please take it down immediately. On a secondary note, I personally find Cheif Justice's take page very vulgar and profane. Please take down Cheif Justice's take page. On a more important note, I do not like Cheif Justice having an account. It offends me that Cheif Justice has an account. Please eliminate Cheif Justice's account immediately so that I will no longer be offended by Cheif Justice's account. I really don't want uncyclopedia to get into trouble because of it. --ShabiDOO 21:00, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

ROFL --Hrodulf 00:43, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

I get offended when I see myself naked. It's pornography! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 01:14, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, PR0N0Z.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 05:53, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Did anybody notice he's watching Niggers? Lol ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 22:42, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

WHAT ALL OF THIS REALLY MEANS

UN:N ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 22:35, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

OF COURSE.WHO CARES?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 11:53, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

My first feature...

...used the term "sand-nigger" 14 times over the course of about 4 very short paragraphs. Does that mean I'm not going to protest a local Neo-Nazi rally this weekend, possibly implementing fireworks in my demonstration? No. This is a satire wiki, so unless the original poster didn't realize this, I don't see any legitimacy in his claims. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 16:55, Wednesday 31 August 2011 -

Wait a minute

Anything with Nazis is now hate speech. Does this mean I need to protest myself? Oh, damn. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 17:57, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Important Message from a Wandering Admin

Don't feed the trolls. --Algorithm 20:19, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Well, this one was no fun at all. We ended up feeding our own trolls.--    20:24, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

I fed the trolls poison. Do I get banned now? ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 22:40, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Shoo! Shoo! And stop stealing my mail! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:15, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

More important message from a shitty admin

Please keep feeding the "trolls". They're funny. --Roman Dog Bird 01:23, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

I find Outstanding Citizen offensive

Does that mean we can delete him? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:21, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:25, 1 September 2011

I find that rampant pregnancy discrimination in erotic images on this site offensive. Can you fix that? --Mn-z 01:31, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

I find all the references to obesity offensive. Can you fix that while you're fixing the other thing? -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 07:52, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

I find people who find people who find offensive articles offensive, offensive. Fix that too. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:36, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

I find people who take time out of their lives to write stupid shit on stupid forums but somehow don't have the time in their busy days to make their fantasy football picks in timely manners offensive. Yeah, that's right. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:02, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Please think of your manners, Guildy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:55, 4 September 2011

Who doesn't find Outstanding citizen to be offensive? His banning was a blessing. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:57, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

He started it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:32, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

We can all take turns playing manager of Aimsplode's ghost ship each week. That should be fun.--    21:34, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Taking turns insulting each other really isn't the mature thing to do, unless you're both just kidding, of course. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:46, 4 September 2011

There will be no ice cream for either of them!--    21:49, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Nobody said I'm not going to control my football team. I have like a million WRs, but no matter what, I'm going to play. Also, when picking for me, make sure no more WRs :D ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 15:50, September 5, 2011 (UTC) I find people who hate people who take time out of their lives to write stupid shit on stupid forums but somehow don't have the time in their busy days to make their fantasy football picks in timely manners offensive. Fuck you. Fuuuuck you, verry much.

Since I have no life whatsoever, I've been doing a lot of autodrafting and I look at what people have and need. I've also researched a good portion of the remaining rankings list so that I don't pick someone who's inactive or a 3rd stringer when there's still starters available. I don't like to win cheaply, so I draft for others appropriately. In the last few weeks I may need one of these teams to beat an opponent with a better record than mine to secure a playoff spot or better seeding in the playoffs.--    16:20, September 5, 2011 (UTC)

Fuck fuck fucking fuck! Fuck! Fuckity and fuck or fuck with fuck fuckfuck fuck, fuck fuck and fuck fuck. Fuck-fuck Fuck fuck fuck! Fuck fuck fuck fuck fucking fucked fuck fuck, fuck fuck and fuck to fuck fuck fuck. !!!~Shabidoo~!!! FU.CK (UTC) Fuck fuck fuck fuck fucking fuck fuck fuck the fuck fuck and fuck fuck! Fuck fuck fuckity fuckfuck fucking and fuck fucking fuck fuck fuck fuck to fuck.

There, there. Everything's going to be all right now. Those men over there in lab coats with syringes and needles are only here to help you. You'll like your room; even the walls are carpeted! Now, this will only hurt a bit... Would you like a cookie? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:43 September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Did someone pick your intended 15th rounder? Look, despite your "I'll probably finish last" whining before we even drafted, I can guarantee that won't happen if you simply set your lineup each week with active players and play free agent vulture. There WILL be key injuries, undrafted players will become fantasy studs and if you keep an eye on the news and snap up the backups that get promoted to starter - you may just make the playoffs. It's an 8 team playoff! A good portion of the league consists of Britishers just screwing around. WE had at least three teams last year that were "ghost ships" - multiple players on the starting roster that were injured/inactive/etc by the end of the season. Again, I really F-ed up my draft last year and still did well because I followed the plan I just laid out for you. Vaunted starting RB's will be dropping like flies and their replacements, who are currently undrafted, will become highly valuable. Trust me. Just be active and you'll win games. Period, end of story.--    05:59, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Ummmmm....wait. Woah! We have to do stuff? I thought the draft was just to pick players and then the team with the best overall performance would win. Ummm....I just don't really understand much of what you just said. We have to pick players? Get free agents (how?)? Would you be the most awsome guy in the world...and just repeat what was said above...in an easy to follow way? I dont mind learning stuff...but I have no where to start with. :) --ShabiDOO 06:52, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Now wait a minute...

So all we have to do if someone starts a forum complaining of being offended is ban them? Why the fuck didn't we do that with Slashy? User:Mrthejazz/sig 01:44, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Anonymous Slashy had this thing about using different IPs; apparently he had access to a boatload of both computers and networks. He was next to impossible to completely permaban. Eventually, everyone just stopped feeding the troll, which made him go away.... Also, it was rather amusing to watch him kick himself in the posterior every single time he posted. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:50 September 10, 2011 (UTC)

hahahaha. Anywho is it just me or is this forum getting more and more off topic. Well I'm going to change that:

I FIND THE NIGGERS ARTICLE OFFENSIVE, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

I think that's it... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:30, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

FUCK YOU SOCKY THERES ALREADY A SOLUTION TO YOUR FUCKING BULLFUCKSHITHEAD!!!!!!!

Call the Whaaambulance, bitch. No, seriously. Bitch. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 23:36, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

SOCKY IS GAY GAY GAY!!! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:41, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

I tend to disagree. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:52, 11 September 2011

Oh fucking shit, fucking shit fucking shit I meant you, Frosty, not Socky....oh, shit....fuck....shit...fuck........no offense, Socky, I fucked that one up biggy time. Here, this is more appropriate:

FUCK YOU SOCKY FUCKING FROSTY THERES ALREADY A SOLUTION TO YOUR FUCKING PROBLEM YOU FUCKING ASSHAT BULLFUCKSHITHEAD!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now, go to hell Frosty. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 01:26, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

no u ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:27, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Son of a bitch u already replied. Fuck you. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 01:28, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Again no u ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:28, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

FUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCKKK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!! (Frosty)

^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 01:30, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

I AM BIGGER LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLLOLOOLOLOLOLLOLOLLOLOLLOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLO!!!!!!!AAAAAAAAA!--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 06

17, September 11, 2011 (UTC)