Forum:Checkuser

Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Checkuser

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4257 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Pre-move, there was a "big" conundrum about getting checkuser rights for bureaucrats. Is this feasible now, and if so, community vote to make it hapen? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it is 100% possible now. Let's vote! -- The Zombiebaron 03:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Should bureaucrats have CheckUser access

Score: +11

1. Obviously. -- The Zombiebaron 03:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
2. Yeas. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
3. I don't trust either of our bureaucrats. I also don't trust most of our users. Can we kidnap a hobo and use him as a checkuser instead? -— Lyrithya ༆ 03:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
4.  For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
5.  F☭R 14:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
6. For, Brando1174
7. For. And for admins too, so I can, uh... not stalk anyone... Yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:24, Jan 14
8. For   ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 03:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
9.  Fore! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:04, 14 January 2013
10.  For. --EMC ^[TALK] 03:50 Jan 14 2013
11.  For. Abso-fucking-lutely. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2013.01.17.20:06
12. Boner. Obviously. -RAHB 00:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
13.  For. I don't care... but sure. MagicBus (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)