Uncyclopedia:VFS

...and so shall it be that every Admin is presented with Shit-Wading Galoshes, a Steel-Plated Banhammer, and an Industrial Strength HuffMaster 2000 upon inception to the order. “Better to reign in Uncyclopedia than serve in Wikipedia” — John Milton on stating the obvious Are you looking to join a team of enthusiastic and extremely sarcastic individuals? Do you like to feel like you are a valuable part of a "team?" Do you want an employer who considers you their slave? If you said "I prefer not to answer" to any or all of these questions, you may be qualified to be a sysop at Uncyclopedia! This is the place where twice a year, Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for the most qualified users to be given the mop of power. Additionally, this is the place for votes to remove ops from a user, either in urgent cases, or during the regular bi-annual votes. Rules for op votes You may nominate whomever you want. Only registered users whose accounts are at least 2 weeks old and have 75 constructive edits may vote on or nominate administrators. No self-nominations. Votes for bureaucrats and interface ops follow the same rules. Votes on those ends follow seperate vote counts. Joke nominations and votes are permitted. These do not count towards normal vote limits, but each user is limited to a maximum of 1 joke nomination, and there can be up to three joke nominations per VFS. Joke nominations should go on the bottom, in italics. The process (all dates and times are calculated in UTC, unless someone gets lazy and is a few hours late/early) Each user may nominate one sysop, beginning on the 1st of every April and October. Until the 20th, users may vote on a maximum of three sysop candidates. From the 21st - 30th, current ops take the candidates with at least 50% of the leader's score and vote on who to op. The ten-day admin-only vote has been replaced by a ten-day admin-only bender, after which the crats will be too hung over to fulfil their duties on time. During the bender, late votes are still valid but dramatically groaned at. On the last day of any month with 31 days, current ops play Russian Roulette to see who gets de-opped. (Frosty goes first with a bazooka) Rules for de-op votes Only established users, per the above qualifications, may nominate an administrator to be de-opped. Be professional, and lay out your case for de-opping clearly and with evidence of their supposed wrongdoing uploaded to Uncyclopedia, and linked in your nomination. For a de-op to be successful, a supermajority (2/3) of votes must be in favor of the motion. No half votes or semi-votes. NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against wiki-terrorism.

New ops for February

Score: 3

• With an inevitable traffic surge, and a new site and blah blah blah. Indeed. Plus, who the heck is doing the daily VFH? Not Romartus. And RAHB is getting tired of doing it day after day XD. But seriously, if any month is good, FEBRUARY is the month to get new ops!.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 01:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
•  For. I'm in favor of getting new ops. --Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss Uncyclopedian Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 02:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
•  For. I'm in favor of receiving ops. — SG1 ^{[citation needed]} 02:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
• yeah. --ShabiDOO 02:22, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
•  For. --EMC ^[TALK] 02:38 Feb 1 2013
•  Limp boner. BizzeBeever just became an op, and the users working on the server are also here. We recently got back a few old ops, things are running pretty smoothly, I think. And I don't mind doing VFH features. -RAHB 02:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but BB will have limited connection for the next few months, if I can recall.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 02:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

•  For - Because you can never have too many garbage picker-uppers. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:41, Feb. 1, 2013
•  Against. We just got BB yo ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Again, he told me he has limited connection to the internet, for maybe more than a few months.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 04:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Abstain (half-chub?) because I don't have enough time around to know what the need is, but I want to mention that I'm back for the foreseeable future, if that means anything to anyone. Also, I'm loving the new surge of traffic optimism, PW.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

You'll always be number three in my heart. I forgot who the first two were but they were probably not real people anyway. -RAHB 04:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

•  For.. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:06, 1 February, 2013 (UTC)
•  Against. Seems like the current ops don't think more are needed. They might know best. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
• Against Unless it's Aimsplode. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
• ok sure. —  (talk) (contributions) Feb 1 2013 16:30.
• Abstain. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:35, 1 February 2013
• NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN! Not right now Madclaw @ ^talk 17:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)