From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The economic effects of retarded babies
|
Score: 10.5 cleft palates
|
| Nominated by:
|
Prof. Olipro  KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 08:43, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
 For. relevant, concise, a massive tour-de-force of academic achievement in socioeconomic analysis -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 08:43, October 28, 2010 (UTC)- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:02, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For all the retarded babies who grow up to be Keynesians. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
         10:22, Oct. 28, 2010
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:33, 28 October 2010
- For. Holy crap guys, that didn't take long to get nomminated. User:Mrthejazz/sig 11:48, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Very gooth! A nice collab. Aleister 12:00 28 10
- For. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:13, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Satire for a change. Style
 Guide 19:03, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Very for. Great article.
 pillow talk 21:02, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 21:03, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 04:39, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For.. Putting aside bias and voting FOR quality.--Funnybony
   20:01, Nov 4
- What Multi said. --Black Flamingo 20:27, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --ERpatient 01:42, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 3.5
|
 Against. While I like the idea and the overall presentation, there are too many little things here. And I don't mean hideous retard babies sucking up currency, I mean minor issues with the article. ~  *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101029 - 00:23 (UTC)- Against. Just don't find it that funny.--HM (T) 03:32, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite there yet. The article has all the potential, it just lacks that "something" that would push it from mild tastelessness into brilliance. -- DameViktoria
 - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 14:29, 5 Nov 14:29, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Very encyclopedic, but not in equal measures of the funny. Probably needed longer to augment in this area before it was nommed. Did enjoy it and would like to see it re-nommed later if it doesn't get featured at this time. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
against--124.181.87.252 05:34, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Just a bit unsure about the photo of the kid used here. Any ideas where it comes from?
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok I can answer my own question. It's a creepy toy as witnessed by this page: http://www.nanasbabystuff.com/RDKBodies.htm I just can't imagine anyone wanting one of these, though they look very much to have been inspired by the work of Ron Mueck. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:07, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain. I understand the tone of the article and the use of the word retard, just not feeling for it as a yes vote, Perhaps a matter of personal taste. Sorry. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:12, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Abstain per Romartus. Nobody thinks much about this until they get pregnant. Then they worry like hell. Only a billion things have to go right to get a "normal" baby. I really feel sad for people with retarded kid. Too much of a pity to laugh about. Funnybony 20:45, Oct 30 20:45, October 30, 2010 (UTC) My view of the subject has nothing to do with the quality of the article, which is excellent. Some people vote against or refrain out of bias, and that has nothing to do with real voting on quality. So I'd like to set the example by voting for this page because it is FA quality. No one should actually vote against a good article out of bias (in my opinion).--Funnybony 20:01, Nov 4
- Don't worry Funnybony, Kathoeys can't get pregnant so you're safe -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:49, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Worrying like hell doesn't take away the fact that this is funny. I have a 2 yr old. If I had read this two years ago, I would have found it funny, I promise you. In fact, because I have a small child, I think I find it funnier. Also, it's satire, and well written satire at that. Did people complain when Swift said, "Hey! Let's eat the poor!" Yes. Yes they did. But thankfully he ignored those people and published A Modest Proposal anyway. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:23, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. My mother almost died giving birth to a baby that came out mentally and physically retarded. He died about 5 hours later. It crushed her, and she almost died. And even I'm not voting against because of that.--HM (T)
- Comment. IP vote stricken for deliberate vote engineering across VFH. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:09, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 08:43, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
For. relevant, concise, a massive tour-de-force of academic achievement in socioeconomic analysis -- 
Against. While I like the idea and the overall presentation, there are too many little things here. And I don't mean hideous retard babies sucking up currency, I mean minor issues with the article. 
