Uncyclopedia:VFH/Marty Friedman

Article: Marty Friedman	Score: 1.5
Nominated by:	Mr N 03:52, Oct 5
For: 5	Nom+4 It's got 26 (I think) sub-pages. Monika has created another rather special article here. Not everyone will appreciate what is going on. I'm not sure I totally do, but I assume it's awesome.... Mr N 03:52, Oct 5 certified PLS loser. --monika 03:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. I remember seeing this around and not getting it. Then I saw it again, and got it, and loved it, but wondered if the real point of it would pass people by. If you follow it properly, it is fucking brilliant though. --UU - natter 10:18, Oct 5 For. The subpage links are obvious enough to geddit, whether they show up on the front page or not TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3.5	~~# Against. - Minor flaws are fine by me, but the formatting is a little off/plus the whole subpage thing does not move me — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)~~ Against. I may be out of line here, but I didn't find this awesome or brilliant. It seemed to me to be a fairly straightforward piece; competent but not outstanding. As far as subpages, yes it builds up variations in a sort of novelistic way but that doesn't show on the FP: only the basic article does, and it is simply not outstanding. (Just my opinion, the usual caveats about my being a brain-dead philistine apply.) ----OEJ 15:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Against Just not really great in my opinion. Kinda for the same reason as OEJ... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC) against. many subpages, tons of different angles, fake edits, the main page is jumbled and crowded...this article scares and confuses me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Against. He's a good guitarist, but this article is only average. 72.1.195.8 23:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I don't get it, so I feel like I can't vote against... but still, I don't get it. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:09 Oct 06, 2008 comment: I'm sorry for having confused and scared people. I'll try not to do it again. @Gerry - By jumbled and crowded, are you referring to anything of the sort that might be fixable within the confines of the premise? @Skull - if there's anything I can do to help you get it, just let me know. @Jack & Dexter - this brings up the good point of how, in the event this gets featured, it would look on the front page. I'll put some thought into it and I'm open to suggestions. --monika 16:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)