From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD. |
Keep |
- Weak keep. There's a lot of good potential there. Everyone who's ever seen a panto as a kid should relate to this. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not overly offensive. Needs expanding though. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and rewrite. Hold your pantomime horses. ----OEJ 16:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC) (Did a liddle rerite and added pichoor.) ----OEJ 17:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't understand entirely, but if it could be expanded so Americans can understand it, then thats good. Capercorn 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. So it is. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Oh no it isn't! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Short and boring Randomator 14:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept —Braydie 21:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I created this page and would like to have it deleted. I fully realize my mistake; it is purely a vanity page.
- Delete. I was unable to get any jokes, and the author probably has given a good reason for this. It's good to recognize a mistake.----OEJ 14:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - The easiest way to get one of your own articles deleted is to blank it. You won't get banned for it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per author. But self-blanking's not really the best way as some people just revert any blanking they come across. Try blanking and listing on QVFD with a note "author requesting deletion". -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Fast track delete —Braydie 21:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. "Her shirt once exploded after the bomb hiding in there detonated. Normally, this would embarace a Girl, but in this case, there was nothing to see." This article is an embaracement. ----OEJ 21:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - This is krap... Capercorn 22:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I wonder if that word is supposed to be embarrass or embrace... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. Horrible. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 10/04 09:13
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Definite Keep, spoof of convolued Time-Travel paradoxeses. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Keep--Abc 12:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Well, it made me smile. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Definately Randomator 14:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand - Too bad the physics of that are all wrong... Capercorn 21:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's not great, but it's not crap. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Old, unfunny crap. --General Insineratehymn 20:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above reason. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment - In case anyone cared, I moved the page, and fixed the link. Capercorn 22:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also Comment. I especially like how you moved it from the wrong name, to another name, which is also wrong. I fix. Or I moved it to an even wronger name. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Gentle parody of the kind of English Day Out we used to be subjected to when we were young. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I haven't heard of it, but that doesn't make it vanity. Anyway, in this case, that doesn't matter.--Abc 12:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Never heard of, no idea if it even really exists, but the article is funny and that's what matters. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This is HUMOUR not nice old American HUMOR. It's supposed to be funny to British people. Capercorn 21:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as even an idiot American like me can laugh at it. goshzillacorrespondence 01:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Really old crap that was never deleted. --General Insineratehymn 23:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- wtf --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nice premise, very weak follow-through. ----OEJ 14:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. "Kahn once lived in the pretty mounts of minnisota where he counted ducklings and giggled in frolick of the sun, He now lives in New Jersey." Bad. Very bad. ----OEJ 21:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- you weak, pathetic article --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Randumb nonsense. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 00:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This random piece of cumquat needs to be asploded to the the 890532758932th moon of Uranus 7.0 with a meatloaf bomb... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Really old crap --General Insineratehymn 18:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
The force is strong in this one maybe it should be tagged for a rewrite? --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Umm... keep. Just. The name isn't funny though and is holding it back. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Has potential Randomator 14:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Call me a Star Wars geek, but I found that one funny. Capercorn 22:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Come on people, this is shithouse. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- you know, we should institute a rule on here that if an article is kept for rewriting that if it isn't rewritten that it should be huffed --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Kept —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Form R-99FPO and all of its sub-pages
Keep |
Keep--Abc 12:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Short, unfunny, older than the hills, and needs to be deleted. --General Insineratehymn 18:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Weakest keep I can muster The first sentence is strangely hilarious, but the rest is a bit disappointing. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm a musician, and therefore found it funny, however the Biology template should be changed to a Jesus loves this article template. Capercorn 22:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete First of all, "triumvirate" is spelled wrong. Secondly...no. Just...no. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 06:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The article ends up a failure: too random.----OEJ 12:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Randomator 14:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- the subject in question is an old soap opera TV show --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Deleted —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Parkerwocky and move it to UnPoetia. ----OEJ 23:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- more 2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- See you in hell --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete And if it's not too bold of me, I've added in the associated poem, which makes even less than no sense without this page. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - This isn't a poetry/short article website. Capercorn 21:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - WAY too short. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 04/8 22:12
- Delete Parkerwock. ----OEJ 23:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
See what OEJ said to see what I did. —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- "WHYY" does this article still exist? --General Insineratehymn 19:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- kill --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deletee Hadd enoughh off thiss jokee noww. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Shoot with handgun -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- WHYY keep it? When you can delete it Randomator 14:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Kill mercilessly ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - I cannot stand radio jokes. Capercorn 21:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short and bad. Also, bad and short. ----OEJ 23:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Old, unfunny crap. --General Insineratehymn 20:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "This page was originally sporked from the Homestar Runner Wiki." Hmm... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above reasons. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Randomator 14:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - It needs to die. Capercorn 21:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Salvage the chords, though. ----OEJ 23:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Yes. Famine banned someone for it earlier. I'm adding it to the rules. Anyone against? No, ok. —Braydie 10:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Deleted —Braydie 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Old, unfunny crap. --General Insineratehymn 20:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above reason. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ???? Randomator 14:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- how did this survive that long --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff 'Tis nought but crap. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - This needs to be huffed right away... Capercorn 21:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Old, unfunny crap. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above reason. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above above reáson ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 11:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Good idea, but too short. Merged only good bits into Boron. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Blow it up in a science lab Randomator 14:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Don't Huff, safely dispose - So does this stuff, make Explosions not happen?!?! Capercorn 21:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete How does this crap survive two years?! --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 06:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry but no Randomator 14:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -
maybe redirect to 6 (number), but no merge. Correction: See comment below. Pentium5dot1 01:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
None of the numpad articles are very good. To maintain consistency while avoiding redlinks on the keyboard, should we mass-redirect all of them to the appropriate articles on numbers, or should we organize a merge/rewrite effort? Pentium5dot1 01:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- representative of most homepages --» >UF|TLK|▋» 07:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- True about the cloning. But keep anyway. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Because. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm. Not much going for it, but it sort of works. Surely there's room for it? RabbiTechno 14:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It could be funny, I say rewrite. Capercorn 21:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. --EMC [TALK] 23:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Disgusting, unfunny Mostly a carbon clone of Me. --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete. It
claims claimed to have been a featured article. It wasn't. It's lying. It shouldn't be allowed to get away with that. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep- I don't mind this article, but admittedly, it does need some work.Randomator 14:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I can't make up my mind. It stinks horribly of school-vanity. On the other hand, I bring to the Committee for VFD's attention Wikipedia has a reasonably developed article on the school; and it's not a highschool. We allow articles on other colleges. ----OEJ 12:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it's voted for deletion because it's crap, not vanity. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Deleted —Braydie 00:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- KEEP, acceptable article getting killed by anime h8ers. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Comment I am not an anime hater, it's just that this article turbosucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep A much better concept that a lot of the anime articles (i.e. doesn't begin "Love Hina is the story of a prostitute called ??? and her man-bitch ???, who..."). Has some laughs in for us non-initiates too. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- comment - yeah that is true, add some images and fix it up --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- keep - read this thing over, and deserves life. not your average animecruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's not that bad. Roman Dog Bird 03:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Or to my talk page. :) —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 19:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Kept Nominator changed mine, and plus —Braydie 00:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Once again, old and full of suck. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete RaNDom. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad. Somebody doesn't like their principal, I think. Take it outside, kids.----OEJ 12:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Useless Randomator 13:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete It's another one out of the vaults that really sucks. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - This article is teh sux! Capercorn 01:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Splorch. The idea isn't bad, but the execution lacks a certain something. Like length, pictures, and funny. --El Zoof 01:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- make it claw its own throat out --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not topical enough. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Short and stupid
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept, voting closed. Oh wait, Gone. -- The Zombiebaron 16:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete It's an old, orphaned article that ain't funny. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Same as above. Capercorn 01:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Splorch - same old, same old. Except worse. --El Zoof 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I dunno, true? Not funny, anyway. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Short and stupid Randomator 11:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete THe only thing that doesn't infest this article is "funny". --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Wow, you have had a lot of VFDing to do today... Capercorn 01:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Splorch. Short, racist, random nonsense. But it's not funny anyway. --El Zoof 01:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- No, just no. Randomator 11:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "Chaucer tried to correct this on his deathbed, but he died." Good for him. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.. It's too incoherent. Some sense needs to be made. ----OEJ 12:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak keep, but probably only because I've been reading Umberto Eco and this is so similar, in a less serious way. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete It's old and senile, and in no way funny. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Splorch. Completely random, and see above. --El Zoof 01:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Average idea, bad execution. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Short, stupid, and there's already an article at Fiddler on the Roof (film). Rogpyvbc 22:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Splorch. Er... what, as Shakespeare once said, the fuck? --El Zoof 01:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Goodbye- almost completely taken up by a template Randomator 07:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The play deserves a much better parody. (God how I hate that "spoilers" template.) ----OEJ 12:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff - It short. It unfunny. Huff. Capercorn 14:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Rather pointless Randomator 15:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Spawned from ∩berday, which is a short article spawned from ∩. At least Nberday should be redirected to ∩berday. --Efitu» Talk|Wikipedia|Email|F@H|Wikia 21:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff with extreme prejudice! - WTF? I fail to see the humor in this. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 22:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rogpyvbc 22:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No perceptible content. ----OEJ 12:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 03:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Any chance we can delete Lord Levy himself at the same time? RabbiTechno 15:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - British humour is good, but this is bad. Capercorn 23:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deny Life - Too short, too lame. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- stoooooooopid --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Who? --General Insineratehymn 17:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 03:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 03:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 03:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep User:DSF 17:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- keep The paragraph at the bottom is funny because it's actually offensive to the writer for holding such attitudes about jew boys. --Hrodulf 22:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Sadly, I understand Yiddish humor, and therefore found that article funny... Keep. Capercorn 15:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I like this article I think it's hilarious Mfitrer 13:08, 5 April 2007
|
Delete |
- Delete RabbiTechno 17:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny at all. No potential to be funny. SteveSims 01:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- no thanks --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Not funny, ugly as hell, poorly written, has the worst template ever created and doesn't even - despite its best efforts - manage to be offensive. Killing it would be a kindness, really. RabbiTechno 17:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Not funny. --Hrodulf 22:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Writing close to real only works if it's funny. Writing far from real is the same way. Odd, that. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep SteveSims 21:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Randomator 21:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Abc 18:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Much as I hate myself for saying this, keep. The shockingly dispassionate tone made me laugh in a guilty way. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|