Forum:Why is Naruto CVPed?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Why is Naruto CVPed?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5956 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Seriously guys I was actually gonna make a worthwhile article with it.

Also I *ahem* was an admin myself on another wiki which was turned into a wikia which is currently abandoned and a piece of crap;

anyways my point is: if you have a problem with IP you can ip protect individual articles for IPs and Newly created users. -- CartoonDiablo

Work on it in your userspace, then when it's done submit it to admins for Quality Approval. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Alright sure. -- CartoonDiablo

Why is this even being brought up? Frankie! 05:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Really, Naruto was VFD by the Uncyclopedian Community. It was CVP'd to prevent IPs from recreating it. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Read BGBU and HTBFANJS. -- Jtaylor118:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

We use too many obscure acronyms, which is a violation of DCWA. Personally, I think we should all STIF or maybe even SUALTWTA! -- sannse (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I beg to differ, Naruto page (the old version that has a really really long page with an image subtitled "Dude we're graduated ninja tech" in it) is funny enough to stay. But then it was VFDed because the "i hate anime" reasons and stuff. Now it's happening again to Gaara. Theres no guarantee that it wouldn't happen to your page, too. Reinn 10:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

My page? Oh noes! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

No, see, anime articles that don't come off as too anime-fanboyish are left alone. Take, for example, Anime. That was featured. Etc etc.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I see, so you were saying that all anime article are like Bleach - which is universal - everyone can understand. Even the non-Bleach fan can finds it funny, is it? I'll keep that in mind. Reinn 04:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

That's the aim - or at least to make things understandable to as many people as possible, since nothing's going to be got by everybody. Those who don't get any of our humour because they're a little bit "special" may have to go to the Simple-English site. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

You know what might be interesting... Most Naruto fans, from what I can tell, are rabid fanboy/girls that tear you apart the second you even breathe wrong at their favored show. It might be kind of interesting to go a sort of J.D. Salinger route and only be mildly enthusiatic about it. "Yeah, the show's all right. It's got ninjas, which is pretty cool, I guess." Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 03:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, personally, i'm kinda disagree. What makes the anime special is, because we know the storylines, and it makes even funnier. Those who don't know, of course, won't get the joke. For example, if i never watch SW , how come i will laugh at Star Wars? (for your reference, i did not watch the movie before reading the page, and then i watched it, read it again, then i laughs). Bleach is somewhat funny because i read the manga; otherwise i won't understand i single thing. I didn't find it funny though. Nevertheless, on the naruto talkpage, theres a link to the original ones, which is way better than current page. It's not the best ever, but it's decent. Only needs to cleanup. Reinn 02:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure the new page was really worth de-CVPing it for to be honest - it's more or less the same kind of thing that's all over the other anime articles. Reinn, put it on VFD when there's some space and I'll vote delete. As for the original, its VFD vote was fairly even. Somebody do a major clean up of it (even if it means sacrificing some fan-humour in places), maybe add some more stuff that'll be funny for everyone, and it could probably go back. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Put Bleach on VFD? No, because other people (maybe unregistered user) might like it and finds it funny. I'm not some kind of selfish person to delete whatever i don't like. This is the flaw of Uncyclopedia, people just delete other people's work just because they don't like it, instead of fixing it to make it better. I dare anyone that say Kakashi page is a crap to make it better, but no one did. Dunno why it hasn't put on VFD though. As for the current naruto page, i didn't find it funny, but i won't vote it on VFD, but instead, i'm gonna fix it. Thats the way Uncyclopedian users should be. Maybe i'll fix Voldemort soon, but i'll wait for the response first. Reinn 10:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm a fan of Naruto, and this article is horrible. But the old article was also deletion-quality. Reinn, the articles were bad even for a fan of Naruto. We need an experienced writer to rewrite the article so it can avoid deletion. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but why deletion? If we delete it, there would be NONE at all, and we must start from the scratch. But if we FIX it, its easier than having the whole new one. What if the newest version aren't funny? Delete it again? Are you guys OK with this loophole? Even the "experienced writer" doesn't guarantee their writing quality includes a decent humor. Try making the better version of Naruto yourself first before voting deletion. How about it?

Btw, if you read on Talk:Bleach, you'll see its the better improvement from before, and many people actually liked it. If we vote delete, won't it be disrespecting the author + the people who liked it as well? It's not about you are the anime fan or not, it's about respecting other people's work and trying to fix it better rather than voting delete, people.

On HTBFANJS, there is written: Just 'cause it's funny to you and three of your friends doesn't make it funny to us - which also means - Just 'cause it's NOT funny to you and three of your friends doesn't make it NOT funny to us aswell? CMIIW. Reinn 02:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, but it has to be funny. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)