User talk:Manforman/Archive 6

Thanks Manforman!

Woo-hoo, I get to break in the new talk page! Thanks for the vote. --THE 12:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Adopted

Thanks for the adoption. Now I want a monkey and a unicorn and a pony and a monkey and another monkey and some chocolate and yet another monkey. --Moneke 13:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Poopsmith's Lounge

You have become exceptionally active in the ways of page deletion. You completely dominate the Poopsmith's Lounge, perhaps intimidating people who would've otherwise come along and dumped a page. Therefore, as new poopsmith of VFD, I humbly request that you develop your own method of setting aside pages. That is, User:Manforman/God-Awful Pages That Have to Be Deleted or something similar. Thank you kindly, Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Since Han has been less active than me and when ZB said so. I dunno, that's the way it is. Thanks for creating your new lounge (for your own use, mind you).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit history

Don't forget to make fun of yourself on that page, like I did. Go nuts. --  Le Cejak • <-> 19:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Parakeet

Sorry to pop your bubble, but while I prefer The Deluxe Edition, the widely-agreed upon version is the plainer one. A reasonable compromise has been found in the form of the messagebox at the top advertising the Deluxe Edition. Please do not edit The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times, as it is "good enough" as it stands.

Please leave any further commentary on the relevant talk page. Thank you.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   20:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)  

Voted

Alirght I gave you my show of support and I would appreciate yours! Thank you, funny article!--Dr. Fenwick 05:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

thing

hey MFM, could you take a look at an article of mine for me, and then, if you think it's good enough, could you throw it onto VFH? if you think it wouldn't survive then don't bother nomming it, no pressure, i'd just like one more respectable opinion. much obliged. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Return the favor?

I got your message, lke the article, and voted for. Could you vote in your support on Uncyclopedia:VFH/Toaster? Thanks. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I voted...

FOR. Great articlee. --Moneke 06:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:...

Voted For. Nice work! RabbiTechno 17:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

THANKS!!!!11!!!!!111111111

	The UnIdiot has chosen to give you an AK-47 as thanks for voting on HowTo:Be safe with guns, and hopes that you will remember to be safe with your shiny new rifle. Don't shoot your eye out!
	The UnIdiot also appreciates you putting up with his incredible amounts of whoring!

Thanks vote teh votzrs! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:25, Oct 19

I LOVE CANCER!!

Hey M4M it's Cajek, go ahead and nom Why?:Cancer is Great if you think it will do well. BTW you score really low on your reviews, but that will get better the more reviews you do. Yeah, M4M, do it. I'll be watching your page, so respond here with ideas. --  Le Cejak • <-> 20:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. The poll makes it seem more like a seminar, and it gets the reader involved. If people have problems with it on VFH (if you nom it), I will get rid of it. --  Le Cejak • <-> 20:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I nommed it. My advice would be to get a caption for Image:Cancer-cola.jpg and get a picture of a graph of the Deaths in Cancer--Sir Manforman 22:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

VERY AWESOME. I don't like nominating my own articles except for Red Light. My prediction: This article, like RL, didn't hit me as "hilarious" however enough people reviewed that one to make me positive. I was really unsure with H2R, but enough people enjoyed it. This one... well, let's just say I trust you. Now I owe you a favor! Anything you want... ANYTHING. /me strokes pillow... --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Cajek has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

W00t!! Thanks for the refreshments--Sir Manforman 23:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Happy Halloween

This is freaking terrifying. Don't watch if faint of heart. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 00:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you, good sir, for realizing the importance of right arrow!

You have been singled by Doovad, yes indeed, DOOVAD, as deserving of thanks!

May your arrows always point in the "right" direction (punny!) and may you carry these lessons with you forever!

Thanks for the vote.

---

Thanks for voting for right arrow! You deserve this crappy template! -- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 02:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

green yellow RED

Woot, go 9th voters! --  Le Cejak • <-> 03:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for helping me get my first ever featured article!--Dr. Fenwick 07:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Roby and Darkwing Duck

Yalo, I see that the Genesis (band) was knocked down, well, I did a piss poor job anyway and I agreed to delete it.

Otherwise, I will fix up Darkqueer Duck, but do you have any suggestions? Should we view Darkqueer Duck as a show, or as a "serious" thing? And also, who was Darkwing Duck's daughter? I guess I'll look in Wikipedia for that, otherwise, yes, the Shredder thing on there, that was bad, I'll remove that and well, wait for your other suggestions. Uncyclopedia seems to list Launchpad McQuack as a "real person." This similarity goes for Doug which is about the show, but at the end, talks about Where Doug is now (I did that section, long last the HONK HONK!)

DARKWING DUCK'S DAUGHTER WAS GOSLIN! woo! --  Le Cejak • <-> 01:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!! --Roby. A N00b. 01:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I voted for your HowTo:Get out of Jail on the For side, may I also suggest a Getting out of jail free card?, that may help.

I have contributed to these articles (or thought I did):
God
Doug - Did the 'Where is Doug Now' section. Yes, there actually is a DOUG FM in Detroit, MI, USA (<-- in case you are not from there). I also restored the HONK HONK!'s
Quack
Animal Crossing: Wild World - Added the Happy Room Academy, I plan on photoshopping a photo still from the movie Hostel, only inputting a charater from Animal Crossing. I was going to use a photo still from SAW III's The Rack, but the guy who get's the rack in saw three is too big and too tall, it's just not working out.

and... uhhh...

Okay, but I didn't do the Superheroic Catchphrases though. I won't take credit for that. --Roby. A N00b. 01:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Roby. A N00b. 01:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Scientists create new protein drink from 'recycled' fetuses

I thought VFH noms only got closed when their score was -3 or less, or because they had low health. You said "rm 0," implying you only took it off because it hit a score of 0. Was it that or low health? Just wanting clarification because VFH confuses me from time to time. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:16 Oct 21, 2007

He also closed Uncyclopedia:VFH/Macau (2nd nom) in the same day with score -1. He has no precedent for closing something just becuase it's score is 0. if it's health was 0, that would've been okay. Jesus, I hope he doesn't get banned for this. --  Le Cejak • <-> 17:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I thought that's what it was — low health or -3 or less. It'd be funny if he got banned for this. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:29 Oct 21, 2007

Oh, and by the by, the Uncyclopedia:VFH/Macau (2nd nom) is fine I think — the health was so low on that, it was negative, and he closed it with the reason "low health" anyhow. Even if the health is 0, I think you're supposed to close it with the reason "low health," not "rm 0". – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:31 Oct 21, 2007

oops, edit conflict. I'm gonna write it out anyway: Oh I don't know. I'm just talking about precedent. Looking at the recent fail, nobody else closed something before the 4 day deadline with more than -3 score and nobody else closed anything that had a score of 0, unless M4M can prove that it had the lowest health. Would YOU like random people closing your VFH nomination? --  Le Cejak • <-> 17:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I think score of zero means the health is zero, but still, I agree, it has to be spelled out for us stupid people in the "reason" bit. Otherwise it looks like the rules aren't being followed. And is it a 4 day limit? I thought it was 3... Look! Small text! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:36 Oct 21, 2007

Nope, I think "score=0" and "health=0" are two very diff things. For one thing, they're in separate columns. #2, no article on the current roster younger than 4 days has a health below 100% right now. I think that's enuff prough. SMALL THINGS ARE CUTE --  Le Cejak • <-> 17:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Exactly! Stop agreeing with me! THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:40 Oct 21, 2007

So what did he do wrong, or are we vandalizing another user's talk page for no reason? ooooooooOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHH!! --  Le Cejak • <-> 17:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Uh... he can't close out things unless they have low health or a score of -3 or less. I think he thinks the rule is a score of 0 or less. Which is wrong. Like your mom. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:47 Oct 21, 2007

Well, so ban him already! MY MOTHER WAS A SAINT! and, uh, your dad! --  Le Cejak • <-> 17:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

edit conflict You know I'd rather sell my soul to the devil than be an administrator! Or maybe you don't! Now you do! Besides, I don't think he needs a ban. Maybe a response would be nice, though. ...yeah...well... YOUR GOD! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:55 Oct 21, 2007

I closed it out because not only it was at 0, it was at 0% health, If you would like me to include that in the comments, I will next time. Sorry about the confusion--Sir Manforman 17:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Yesh. "rm 0" is not a legitimate reason. Thanks for responding. The end. I go now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:55 Oct 21, 2007

Thanks

-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  12:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)