Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation" (new version!)

UnNews:An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation" (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation"	Score: 8 people adding rude words
Nominated by:	Pup t 02:46, 10/09/2009
For: 11	Nom and For. - There's a few pee reviews floating about the place by both Chief and Miley. Think I've fixed most of the againsts. Pup t 02:46, 10/09/2009 For. I peed on it and gave it a 39 before Puppy made many improvements. Now, go POOF! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:07, September 10, 2009 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:56, 10 September 2009 ███ Sir Mac Mania GUN—[23:59 10 Sep 2009] For. per above Mn-z 02:28, September 11, 2009 (UTC) For raping jews with pineapples and sicking pig ears up a Muslem's bottom. Loved the article too. *Orian57* Talk 02:39 12 September 2009 For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:33, 12 Sep For. ChiefjusticeDS 07:47, September 13, 2009 (UTC) For Now excellent instead of merely very good --Sog1970 09:46, September 13, 2009 (UTC) For Saw this a while back, good stuff --Morgz789 11:25, September 15, 2009 (UTC) For There's lots of good stuff in here. I think it could be a lot better but still good enough.mAttlobster. (hello) 11:24, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Wow There's a whole lot of stuff here. Unfortunately, it doesn't add up to FA. --THINKER 09:32, September 11, 2009 (UTC) Against. Not offensive enough. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 12:55, September 17, 2009 (UTC) Yeah! FUCKFUCKFUCK. Pup t 22:49, 17/09/2009 against.** it's ok, but i can't see it as a feature. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:57, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain., as per last time, but I think POTR was expecting this. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:39, Sep 11 That was unexpected Pup t 05:47, 11/09/2009