Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary	Score: 11 Users who have never seen what the banned screen looks like. Honest.
Nominated by:	MrN 23:23, Oct 5
For: 12	Nom+4 So I go to Strange but untrue's page and I find this. Another quality article which was never featured, possibly because it's "self-referential". Well trousers. It's good. MrN 23:23, Oct 5  For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Yeah. --monika 23:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For It's simple, it's untrue, and it's familiar enough and trivial enough to be understood and loved by our greedy, idiotic, illiterate sponsors. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For Very good. Geoffprickett 16:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC) most surely not pants as per MrN. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) For. To me, this is more about Jeffrey Archer than self-reference. It also does more to explain the stuff about banning than Hardwick's article, thus making it more accessible. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  16:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC) For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 17:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC) For. Now this is genius, now, if you'll excuse me, I'll go shag the sheep. Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 00:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC) For. As Mick notes, it works on more than one level, with the Archer stuff. Of course, some people may not have heard of Archer, thus removing that level, but it's still good without it. And we've featured articles on similar subjects before, so why not this? It's funny, and stuff. --UU - natter 09:20, Oct 9 Eh fuck it You can compare things til the cows come home but it doesn't stop it being good. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC) For I was actually planning something very similar to this. I'm sad I didn't write it earlier. Still, this is basically what I had in mind, so, nice. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	Not only self-referential but also not funny or satirical. Just boring. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 05:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain It's very good but Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal did it first and less injokey. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 02:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Abstain. - As per DJ — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Guys... Is this a reason not to feature? MrN 14:40, Oct 7 Abstain. because I thought Fundlebuggy's article was better. Sorry. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:36, Oct 8

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.