Against: 8
|
- No. ~
 21:34, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. This will boost the five year old kids or younger crowd who drop by here for a dump. Not a feature in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:05, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Too much of an in-joke imo. funny with context, but not VFH worthy. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 18:09 EST 10 Feb, 2010
- Against. ChiefjusticeDS 23:21, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. How is this an in-joke? Just looks like actual poop rather than funny poop to me. MrN
 23:55, Feb 10
- Boop. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN00:06, 11 Feb
- Well, I'd say it's a little too carpy for the front page. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:34, 11 February 2010
- Honestly, I really don't like this. It's stupid. -- InvincibleFlameGrueMaster 02 11, 03:03, 2010
|
| Comments
|
- Allow me sir... It's obviously a pile of shit which should be at VFD. The joke is mostly in the nom itself because it's such a shit article. A few people then think it's cool to vote for even though they know it's a pile of shit "cos they are fighting the system man" or are just desperate to look cool. Some actually do think it should be an FA and the less said about that the better. A few people are just bored with the place and don't really give a monkeys so they vote for just to see what happens... The people who actually take VFH seriously vote Against, cos... It's a pile of shit. A few people vote abstain making pointless comments, and this then makes the people who voted for feel all clever cos they know what is to them the "real joke" being that it's on those who voted against. It's also a good way to generate a bit of traffic on VFH as any voting is generally better than none, so in the end it's often a good idea. The down side is that the whole thing is actually an attempt to maintain the drama generated by banning a disruptive user for as long as possible. That happens mostly when people are getting bored by the actual process of writing articles, and are looking to spice up life on the wiki by adding a bit of controversy. The only really boring part is when some asshole British cunt comes along and dumps a big load of text onto the nom in some big un-funny rant which everyone will wish they had not bothered to read if they do. Let's hope that does not happen. MrN 02:28, Feb 11
- That's very judgemental to some good people. This isn't a war, drama, or otherwise an attempt at anything except a fun way of honoring not the disruptive user but the concept of a ten-year old who just wanted to play. It wasn't meant to be a VFH nominee. It was literally how I describe it below. The kid came by, ADD'ed his way out of here, but his sense of life was a bit contagious to some people. So your "reasoning why" people do something is, again, judgemental, but does not equate to one-point-of-view versus another, but many points of view having some fun within a context that they do understand. Each user has motivation for what they do, and each is unique to their experience and intention. Anyway, read the below comment, which explains why and what about the article. Nothing more or nothing less than what is described there. Al 2:43 11 Feb. MMX
- So much text... My mind is going numb.... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:48, 11 February 2010
- I think you are being judgemental by saying I'm being judgemental. Maybe my comment was a joke? Or... Maybe it was a troll? Maybe you might find out what that is, and why they do it. You might also like to look at his block log... MrN 02:52, Feb 11
- He's 10 years old, not a troll. He happened to fall in the rabbit hole for a few days and clapped his hands at the strange creatures he found there. Some of the creatures talked to him, or tried to help him, and he got 10-year old angry at some and laughed with others. Of course he'd never last here, and maybe took my advice and went to play in the street. So for a few moments he looked around, then was huffed. Life in a nutshell. Al a few minutes later.
- Now you are making me laugh. Below you tried to tell RDB (who banned him) what the score was... Now you are trying to tell me (who banned him twice) what the score was. Maybe get some facts first next time... MrN 03:09, Feb 11
- I'm all for the ban, he deserved to be banned, but only because he was 10 and had no concept of what being even 11 is like. Why can't some people enjoy what occurred and ended quickly without being criticized? Just as some people can do the right thing and ban his ass? Monkeys, we're all just monkeys when it comes down to it, so maybe the damn article does have more of a point than even I thought. Because in the end the man has had enough, poops in his hands, and throws it back at the chimps. Maybe the damn thing is VFH material from that point of view. Come on, shock the fuck out of us, and vote for it from that point alone. Al few minutes later.
 Comment. Jeez, Roman. VFH? Here's the background. I LIKE PIE!!!, a 10-year old who was running around the site for awhile and was being helped by some very patient users (Zana, Happytimes, others) wasn't writing an article, and Happytimes suggested that he write one called "Poop throwing monkeys". After his ban many tributes to his memory were going up, on forums and such, and I thought a fitting tribute would be the creation of the "article he would have done". Once started, it was fun to make it the most Boop! article I could imagine. HELPME and Happytimes added a line, and its talk page has some of that history. There you go. Aleister in Chains 22:34 10Feb. MMX
- Dude, I know. I love stupid shit like this. Now look, you're making me admit that I know that I voted for a piece of shit! Oh, well, I had my laugh. Whatever. --
 Roman Dog Bird  22:48, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nom, and I did laugh mightly while working on it. If it's funny to several people, why not? (did you click on the links? gross but funny, even the last one, which makes you forget what you saw) Aleister in Chains 23:23 10 2 MMX
- Comment. I know this won't be featured. I just think, with recent drama, I'd like to show some lighthearted-ness. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!!
  NOTM 23:02, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. But what if it was about a piece of poo that throws monkeys at people?--
   03:00, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Now that'd be hilarious. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:02, 11 February 2010
- Is this what's it like to totally run out of ideas? ;-) -- 03:05, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
|
Yes. 
Comment. I don't get it. 
Comment. Jeez, Roman. VFH? Here's the background. I LIKE PIE!!!, a 10-year old who was running around the site for awhile and was being helped by some very patient users (Zana, Happytimes, others) wasn't writing an article, and Happytimes suggested that he write one called "Poop throwing monkeys". After his ban many tributes to his memory were going up, on forums and such, and I thought a fitting tribute would be the creation of the "article he would have done". Once started, it was fun to make it the most Boop! article I could imagine. HELPME and Happytimes added a line, and 
