Uncyclopedia:VFH/Pikachu

Article: Pikachu	Score: -4
Nominated by:	Mad Scientist Adam Mada 01:09, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
For: 0	No for votes
Against: 4	Against. Do I even need to say why? Saberwolf116 03:11, July 18, 2010 (UTC) Against. Sigh. --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 03:20, July 18 2010 UTC Against. These nonsense articles are for yesteryear's Uncyc. In other news, these nonsense articles are for yesteryear's Uncyc. At least the binary and Morse code articles are decipherable ... mostly. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[03:33 18 Jul 2010] No. The links don't do it any favours either. ~ Lyrithya shifty eyes (words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 05:47 (UTC)
Comments	Considering that the article is nonsense, which is ment to be mostly undecipherable at first glance untill further effort is put into decodoing it and the fact that it is nothing more than a large redundancy joke which is a refrence to the particular method most Pokémon communicate in retrospect. In itself — though most articles in the nonsense category do tend to be rather overrated with no good reason — this specific work of revision is anything but an underrated peice of shit that nevertheless still outreasons said articles. Assuming that the readers who do decide to waste their insignificant lives deciphering the updated, "pikachized" article take as long as I did to painstakingly translate the English language to that of the Pikachu's and still retain the same tone and meaning, I do agree that the article may overwhelm most, if not all readers to some extant and be considered highly repulsive. Since it is up to your interpretation though, show me what you think...