Uncyclopedia:VFH/Otters

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Otters (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Otters	Score: 13 lazy, boring disgraces to mammals everywhere
Nominated by:	sirsysrq @ 17:51 Apr 12
For: 13	N♥m && f♥r. This is by far one of the best articles I've read on this site in a long time. It's certainly the best rewrite I've ever read. And I mean EVER. sirsysrq @ 17:51 Apr 12 For. This definitely otter be featured. -OptyC Sucks! CUN 18:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Sehr Gut. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 18:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC) SFor Thank you special:random for showing me this page in the first place!   Le Cejak • <Apr 12, 2008 [21:20]> Fail Billy, Badgers - Awesome --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 02:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)  For. When I first saw this here, slowly collecting for votes and not collecting againsts I said to myself, "how is this possible? the otter is so boring! How can it be funny enough to get no against votes at all?!" then I read the article Robertodole 05:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Tarka. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:15, Apr 13 For Fascinating! --THE 11:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Yo. Stuff like this is the reason I love Uncyclopedia. That, and I don't get out much. -- Guybles 14:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC) For --Dr. Fenwick 19:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Yerp -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Quite Despite their perceived superiority, we CAN badmouth them on the internet! Muzak 03:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---