Uncyclopedia:VFH/Nursery

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Nursery (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Nursery	Score: 16 Eloquent Toddlers
Nominated by:	Dame 15:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 18	nom&for. Orian57 brings us another disturbingly authentic depiction of life through the eyes of a child. --Dame 15:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC) For I like Sonje because she nominated my story which is much better than anything Thomas can do -- he can't even do finger paintings, you have to put the paint on the page not your mouth and he's stupid because he doesn't know that! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:59 22 May 2009  For. A good nomination ! --Romartus 17:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC) For per what I said earlier. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Eh, sure. Still a few things i'd like to see fixed that I pointed out in my review, but it's good enough as it is. Saberwolf116 03:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC) For --Nikau 03:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC) For. per above. Mnb'z 01:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC) For. This is well written in the style it's trying to capture. It's funny, and satirical, but not exactly witty. It also has the feel of a featured article. I.E. it isn't really a specific kind of article, like history-themed or science -themed or something like that. It's got a fairly neutral theme. Hardly a line out of place. Very good. Dorsalfrog Prime 01:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC) fwhore Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:37 May 25 '09 For sure. T. (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC) For Great article, friends laughed, I chuckled. - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 23:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC) For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)  For. Oooh, it's got little kids in it! Another funny article from Mr. Oriano. Sheesh. - [08:17 26 May 2009] PlebYettie For. This is funny, therefore I vote for. --UU - natter 12:58, May 26 For Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 18:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Yeah. Yeah. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:16,26May,2009 19:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:03, 26 May Strong For Despite the fact I think Mr.Orian should branch out from his first-person genre. But then again, he is really good at it so who am I to judge?    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   23:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against Been done by you before, and in a funnier manner. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC) You seem to be on VFH solely to vote against articles. Saberwolf116 03:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Sure, why not? --Nikau 03:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Against. Didn't enjoy it. --Docile hippopotamus 06:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Against. This made me sad, because it just didn't have the magic of the sandcastle one. :( • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:16, May 26
Comments	Abstain per DJ. I don't know why, but I'm pretty tired of the first-person genre. Don't cry, little one! It's not you: it's me.   Le Cejak • <7:08 May 23, 2009> On the second read it is rather charming so who am I to say no. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Comment. Looks like this one is in the bag - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 23:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.