From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Joseph Gobbles
|
Score: 1
|
| Nominated by:
|
Soviet☭ (Ask for free votes) 18:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
|
For: 7
|
 For. Soviet☭ (Ask for free votes) 18:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)- ShabiDOO 19:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- i hab a stronk reeding this uhhhhhhh
 Lucyna K 12:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. i love puns Schism (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- You know what? Fuck it. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 21:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- For. Mr. George
 / talk 21:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- To quote snake,"You're pretty good.." Lieutenant Gamma
 Here, Friend, have some meth. 03:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
 Against.  23:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)- Against. Take this back to the Encyclopedia Dramatica, man... User:OrdinaryJoe1234 20:23, 2 January 2026
- Against. I Chuckled at it, but I wouldn't call it feature material. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ
 HAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 02:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah no. i'm also testing this new gadget. Turb0-Sunrise de la YANKEES SUCK! 16:32, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- After much thought, perhaps, the mostest, muchest thoughts a person thinking could ever conceive of thinking, I have decided to vote AGAINST! Thank you for your attention to this matter!
 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump • 06:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Against. While funny, less of a satirical article and more of just a funny page.Nice work but no exactly featured material in my opinion. Purplexed (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
P.S. I actually do visit Encyclopedia Dramatica occasionally, and this looks nothing like an actual ED article. For those of you who don't know, the primary purpose of ED is to document memes and Internet drama, but yes, they do fill with gore, racism, anti-Semitism, etc. And most articles have a giant gallery of porn related to the article's subject at the bottom of the page. For the lulz. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 02:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
 Comment. I mean, really, I get Uncyclopedia is a place for satire, but is it a place for hate? OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryJoe1234: Is Uncyclopedia a place for hate? no, it isn't. but this article isn't hating on anybody; if anything, it's mocking the hate. just because a piece of literature showcases something unethical doesn't mean that it's supporting it; that'd be like saying that books like Maus or The Boy in Stripped Pajamas supports nazism because they have nazis as characters. so I don't really understand your question. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hate? This is all clearly satire. Have you lost your shabi-minds? Uncyclopedia isn't a safe space. This place is littered with offensive articles and it is clearly satire. Did you not notice in the article how the young kids are clearly being brainwashed depite having friends they are being talked into disliking? Holocaust tycoon is one of the sites most successful article. It is also clearly satire. No subject, none at all, is taboo here. This article is not hate. Yikes. ShabiDOO 23:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. 
Against. 
Comment. I mean, really, I get Uncyclopedia is a place for satire, but is it a place for hate? 