| Article: An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation"
|
Score: 2 stoopid fucks
|
| Nominated by:
|
Pup 12:14 18 Jun '11
|
For: 4
|
 self nom and for This is the article that I always felt was the one that got away. Time to try it a third time. Pup 12:14 18 Jun '11- For. --Mimo&maxus 07:33, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. As a stoopied member I red the sideber and laffed so much I accidentsly voted hear. Aleister 21:19 18-6-'11
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:12, 20 June 2011
|
Against: 2
|
- Interesting concept, but isn't really that funny, if you ask me. --Scofield & The Machine 07:34, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 Against. All front and end but missing a satisfactory middle to make this work as feature in my view. Sorry. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
- But enough about your mother - what did you think of the article?
 Pup 12:47 20 Jun '11
|
| Comments
|
- You may want to work on the formatting. Having all the images like that doesn't look very good, and the stuff at the bottom just isn't cross-browser compatible, or got broken somewhere along the way. I'd say more, but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to do. 1234 ~
 12:52, 18 June 2011
- Done. Pup 08:41 18 Jun '11 20:41, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I guess this just leaves me at a loss as to why it's there. Also, those images still look bad at higher resolutions. 1234 ~ 13:47, 20 June 2011
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
self nom and for This is the article that I always felt was the one that got away. Time to try it a third time. 
Against. All front and end but missing a satisfactory middle to make this work as feature in my view. Sorry. --
