Talk:WikiWars

Please make an article out of these images!!

An acual comment on the article: Wow, the startring part with the images was hilarious, especially with all of the Star Wars: Knights of The Old Republic referance! --142.161.156.62 15:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

This is actually funny. Well done - David Gerard 15:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

The Fifth Wiki Death Star

Featured picture candidate
{{{4}}} Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]] Archive - Discuss this image

Wiki DeathStars moved to WikiWars, on the discussion page. Please, anyone who cares, make an article about them.

Sorry guys. It's neither the time nor the place, but I couldn't resist --S P I N N I E 22:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• For! This is actually the best of the bunch.--Bradaphraser 22:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very original idea,actually.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• I agree, Four was not enough. Nonymous 00:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For, eh? --The Zombiebaron 00:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• We need 'for more version--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN³ NotM BLK |_LG⁸+::: 00:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against As an in-joke, it's really funny (and well made), but I can't imagine people that haven't seen the others will understand it. In any case, there should probably be an article for these pictures (something about a brave group of uncyclopedian rebels fighting a war against the evil foundation, aided by teddybears). Doug 03:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I like this one, it's funny. However, without a wikideathstar, it is a slightly confusing in-joke, as Doug mentions above. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I'll vote for it if someone gives it a suitable description. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment I just changed the caption...you like it Dawg? --The Zombiebaron 01:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment I changed it again, but it's still not funny. --S P I N N I E 03:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I changed it. :-) --Boy Toy bitch at me 03:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• For. But how many Wiki Deathstars does one need to make? --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 03:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too blurry and hard to get. - Sikon 06:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for - add more symbols to the walls to make it look more like a Wiki. --80.195.22.150 09:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. In-jokes are the best jokes. --KATIE!! 20:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For see, THIS is new, all the other ones, just no. new jokes,or at least variations like this one, PLEASE!!!--Nappy The Quarryman 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Rataube 13:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against: in the context of the other ones, this is good but it doesn't have enough funny as a standalone image to warrant featuring. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against, until. Improve this picture, make the puzzle pieces smaller, and then I'll vote for it. --Boy Toy bitch at me 23:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: This rules! (24.207.91.40 04:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC))
• Against. The joke has got so out of hand, it's lost the original "funny". --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 22:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment If by "out of hand" you mean "funny", and by "it's lost the original "'funny'", you mean "It should be continued," I concur.--S P I N N I E 06:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Great, this shit is headed for the number one spot! ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 19:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The others were better. --OsirisX 01:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: This is head ans shoulders above the rest, the best one.
• For. --Gamiac 18:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is just cool!(Uncyclopedian 00:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
• Against there's obviously some in-joke here that I'm missing because I've not be on here for a while, and if I don't get it, I think a lot of other people won't either. Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 01:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Sorry, but A for effort. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The Fourth Wiki Death Star

Featured picture candidate
{{{4}}} Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]] Archive - Discuss this image

For. I know you all hate me now because of my really crappy photoshopping, but I'm starting to figure it out, and I really like this one.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. I think this is the best of them. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• For --~ Kakun · talk 09:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. - Sikon 11:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against. The puzzle pieces should at least sort of follow the shape of the death star. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 11:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak for. I personally prefer the third Wiki Death Star, below. Here you've based the Wikipedia Logo on the Death Star, I think it would be better to work from the Wikipedia logo. I think you can find a blank one made by Gutza here. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 11:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Hesitant Against It needs more cowbell --The Zombiebaron 13:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against I stand by the pic I voted for below.--Bradaphraser 21:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against people, Once is funnie, 2 times is ok in context, 3 is too damn many. this horse is dead--Nappy The Quarryman 02:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

This one is the fourth actually.--Rataube 11:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

oh holy shit...--Nappy The Quarryman 18:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

(sings)... the stars are brightly shiiiiining..."--Bradaphraser 22:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak against. Meh. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• I am growing weary of voting against this image; it hasn't been funny and it's not getting funnier so please stop. --Sir gwax (talk) 20:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I'm sort of tempted to make a fifth. --S P I N N I E 22:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Also, the overlay on the inside as revealed by the missing puzzle pieces is bothering me. The image continues as if it were still the outside. --S P I N N I E 04:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. I like this one - David Gerard 02:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The Third Wiki Death Star

Featured picture candidate
{{{4}}} Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]] Archive - Discuss this image

I added my take on the subject above, if only to obfuscate the voting process. --S P I N N I E 05:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• That's beautiful. I'm all for this one. Doug 14:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• hell yea! for--Nappy The Quarryman 18:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Heh. OK. I like this one. The reflector looks just slightly cheesey, but I'm digging the erosion / fragmentation effect on the globe. --T. (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Very yes Nonymous 21:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against I got tired of the wiki death stars, let them die alredy.--Rataube 21:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• No. The first thing i see when i look at it is the blue edit box in the corner. Wtf? Secondly, you can totally tell that it is just the wikipedia logo all cut and drawn on with a little circle pasted in the center. I'm sorry, but I'm beginning to agree with Rataube, the perfect wikideathstar is impossible, give up.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:52, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The edit link is damn funny, and you know it. And yes, it is a wikipedia logo "all cut and drawn on," but isn't that the point? --S P I N N I E 05:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against As much as it pains me to vote against this, as it's beautifully done, the one above is better because the puzzle piece look makes no sense at all on this one.--Bradaphraser 22:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• For, unless the image above is featured, ---Rev. Isra (talk) 00:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• For this version. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 13:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. Perhaps the best of them. - Sikon 16:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I guess it's not there fault that the circle is misplaced and the line doesn't look right. At least judging by the original source image.

• Nee Jabba no badda yah I like this one better then the other ones --The Zombiebaron 22:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• For.Very very good image.--200.161.136.227 19:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

• /me swallows his humility and votes for his own image. --S P I N N I E 03:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

The Second Wiki Death Star

Featured picture candidate
{{{4}}} Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]] Archive - Discuss this image

Keying off of whywhywhy's original Wiki Death Star, I decided to run with the joke. Since many who voted against that one said they either couldn't tell what it was supposed to be, or didn't think it was clear enough, I hope that this one satisfies those. Strong Rad 20:19, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• I'll go for this one.--Bradaphraser 23:14, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Very weak For: I like it better when the death star is complete. --Boy Toy bitch at me 23:31, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Too cartoonish, i definately liked the other one better.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:37, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Weak for. A complete one would be better --Rataube 02:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC) Against. I thougth the balck background would be better, but it's worse.--Rataube 19:53, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Well, the joke I was going for was the Second Death Star...which wasn't complete...and the incomplete puzzle of the Wikipedia logo...but I guess I didn't convey that well. Strong Rad 03:44, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Oooh, almost. Looks too much like Wikipedia and not so much as the death star. I think I also liked it on the blackbround, like space. Prettiestpretty 02:23, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• I think this is better, but it needs to be in space. This reminds me of the death star under construction, which fits with the wikipedia logo perfectly. For now, I'll abstain. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against: there's something about it that really just turns me off. --Sir gwax (talk) 05:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against for now, for if placed on a black background. - Sikon 05:42, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC) For. - Sikon 13:09, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against - Just not doing it for me, --Leo 06:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Against per Prettiestpretty. --Algorithm (talk) 08:56, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

*Against - the contrast is 2 points 2 bright and the background needs to be tinted. The planet needs more colours, also it is the wrong version of he death star. Finally it not subtle enough. no wait... you dont have enough X's in your name and it needs a hitlerism. Ill post more as they reason come 2 hand.--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN³ NotM BLK |_LG⁸+::: 09:17, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For - I'm lovin' it. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 09:52, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For - Mhailles well thought out and eloquent argument has persuaded me otherwise(see vote above) --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN³ NotM BLK |_LG⁸+::: 12:36, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

*For The Mhailles-Why party has captured my vote. --S P I N N I E 15:36, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Actually my for is only on the condition that it's re-done, and not so shitty-like this time. Those white spots around the black spots are a real turn-off. --S P I N N I E 15:38, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For the black background version that is there at the tine of this vote. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:16, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I dont know if you guys remember, but when voting for the last "wikideathstar" I told you that anything trying to bring out the puzzle pieces would look too much like the wikipedia logo, and not enough like the actual deathstar. Now lets review Prettiestpretty's comment: "almost. Looks too much like Wikipedia and not so much as the death star." Anyway, just thought that you might want to consider that when voting.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:09, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For This one is even better than the last Wiki Death-Star. Good work. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 15:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• For I got the death star ref straight away. Great work Heezy 15:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• For Awesome. Cosmotron 11:55, 20 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• As it is now, it's hard not to vote for. --MuncherOfSpleens 23:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• For - Fully operational it is. — 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp ^{sex & violence!}17:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. It just works so well... --Hinoa 23:27, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

• For. Dun dun dudun dun dudun dun dudun! Swordmaster 17:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• Against. I still can't see what it's supposed to be fast enough. I think just overlaying the black lines on the logo doesn't work. You could try embossing the logo and using a 'hard light' blend, to make it look like the lines are grooved into the death star. I like the joke, but neither picture works well enough. Doug 17:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Against. Good joke, bad execution. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 13:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The First Wiki Death Star(or so we thought)

Featured picture candidate
{{{4}}} Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]] Archive - Discuss this image

• Nominated. - Guest 10:10, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak for. Detail does not show well. --IMBJR 14:05, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If you clear up the image, it's a for. Acid Ammo 14:20, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It took me a while to spot the joke. More wikped logo, less death star and I'll change my vote. Doug 16:32, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against Same as Acid--Rataube 16:43, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against: Cute idea, but I'm not the big fan. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:23, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Hells Yeah: This is a really good image, however, the symvols could be more prominent. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 20:03, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For the joke, but against this image as is. With polish (explained above), this could be awesome.--Bradaphraser 20:33, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I could see it right away, but probably only because i was automatically looking for it based on the title. Ummm... I'm gonna go with a Weak For (my first Weak vote ever) id give it a full for if it was clearer. See Below.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:04, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For the joke, against this version. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 00:21, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For Ima not changin it cos the joke is meant to be subtle not a frying pan in the face. A mans gotta stand up for his principles So there…. O yer and I didn’t save the psd file. Actual that’s probably the whole reason the psd thing.. maybe the picture needs some nazi monkeys? --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN³ NotM BLK |_LG⁸+::: 11:29, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against The joke is good but the picture ain't. --인벨날아스바라굿 16:02, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. I likes it. --KATIE!! 16:43, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Its well exicuted, but people tell me that to be placed in the honored spot, it needs to be something that registers quickly with viewers, so I have to vote against it (sorry) Prettiestpretty 16:52, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I love the idea. I don't love that it's not obvious. I'm very torn on this image, so for now I give it a weak against. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 23:57, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Subtlety isn't used often enough. That said, I think that the caption should be changed to something like "Wikipedia's Death Star" so that people would at least know what joke they're looking for. --EvilZak 00:08, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

That might be funny - a caption along the lines of "Website logo of our arch nemesis Wikipedia". » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:25, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• I am changing my vote to For. I thought about it for awhile, and i agree with those that say it should be subtle. If it was any less subtle people might question how much it looks like a death star, instead of how much it looks like the wikipedia logo. Right now it's perfect, any changes would only demote its perfection.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:49, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's very clever, but it's not that funny. Frankenberry Grr 03:42, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. That much kickassery cannot be ignored, I say!--DeathByPie 14:29, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against "Subtle" doesn't mean "can't tell what it is". Definitely could use some fixing. Beyond that, how many Star Wars jokes are we going to do? ....except for Vader on a Segway...hehe Strong Rad 19:14, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)