Forum:Yes or no? New sysops in March?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Yes or no? New sysops in March?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4260 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Well, looks like Feb did get its fair share of spam hits (mostly towards the end). Traffic is rising, and there could still be some good oppage decisions. So, let's do a forum vote. Maybe the current admins won't shoot it down this time.

Vote

Score: -5

1. N&F - Well, of course. I'm always for new stuff.  ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 22:24 3.01.13

   The current VFS system does not require monthly votes like this. When we need more sysops we will get more sysops. -- The Zombiebaron 02:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

2. Weak for–only one. I'm not too supportive of the new admins right now–due to the Wikia move, new admins like Dawg, Ljlego, and TheLedBalloon are back—I wasn't really sure whether to vote for or against. —  (talk) (contributions) 22:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
3. Against Rise in traffic doesn't mean we need new admins. The current admins are on top of everything that happens, it's only when things start going out of control that we need admins. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
4.  I say op everybody ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 1 '13 23:49 (UTC)
5. I really don't care if we get new admins or not. BB and MadMax have been working their asses off in the past week. So I say no. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 00:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
6.  Always - I don't have nearly enough asses to kiss. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 02:04, Mar. 2, 2013
7. I'm still waiting for the "Forum:Yes or no? New writers in March?" vote. -- The Zombiebaron 02:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

   Forum:Yes or no? New writers in March?‎ ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

8.  One reason only - some of the current admins might want to write instead of being on constant patrol duty. But if they're happy with that, I don't care. -- Style  Guide 16:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
9.  NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN No... just no. Madclaw @ ^talk 20:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
10. Against NO. What is the point in this vote????? mAttlobster. (hello) 00:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

    To get you to use five question marks!!!!! Style  Guide 08:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

    I got carried away with the excitement. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

11. Against Per Matt lobster, we obviously do not need no administrators. What is the point in this vote? —  (talk) (contributions) 16:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

    I already told Matt what it was. Why don't you read it ^ up there? -- Style  Guide 18:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

12.  Limp boner. -RAHB 08:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
13.  No. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
14.  For. Uncyclopedia is a job creator. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 04:48, Tuesday 05 March 2013 -

Honestly...

Per Madclaw on IRC: Most of the people voting for are just kids, looking for that extra button. A little stereotypical, but it is what I imagine of most of the people here. —  (talk) (contributions) 22:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

What? - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 00:47, Wednesday 06 March 2013 -

He says he imagines. You should pay no attention to what someone imagines. -- Style  Guide 13:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Colin - you, I and Kip are the only ones who voted for, it seems. What kind of a button do you need? I'm asking because I really cannot count myself as a kid any longer. -- Style  Guide 14:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)