Forum:Uncyclopedia: The Play
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Uncyclopedia: The Play
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5973 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
After listening to the latest greatest masterpiece by Insineratehymn, I have come up with a brilliant and funny article. Okay? I think Uncyclopedia should do one big audio play. You know with us audio stars playing out the most exciting, incoherent and horrid plot ever made, Which will be made by us doing multiple drugs in a dope section. You know, Cocaine, Heroin, PCP, Super AIDS, Etc.... and the following characters will play a major part.
- Chuck Norris
- A grue
- Francis Winkler
- Oscar Wilde
- Captain Obvious
- Captain Oblivious
- Sophia
- Mr. Stingray
- Willy on Wheels
- Jimbo Wales
- 4.252.99.182
- Yakov Smirnoff
- Benson
- Bob the Generic n00b
- And more!!!!!
So... You In? --NXWave 07:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- You forgot many of the great memes......WITH SAVINGS!!! So FU SPANG, and where are my cuntymints? EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 08:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)~
- Yeah, I'm listing the characters based off memes, The actual memes of Uncyclopedia will be put in the play when we do the totally illegal drug session in some back alley. --NXWave 10:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
<whore>ahem</whore> ~
12:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- You are missing the n00b. I demand to be the n00b. I do a really g00d n00b. Pieface 16:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh right, He could come into the movie mid-way and die near the mid-end. --NXWave 20:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Movie? I thought this was a play? -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Movie, Play? What's the difference. We're just making an audio play.--NXWave 09:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Play? I thought this was a movie? -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Movie, Play? What's the difference. We're just making an audio play.--NXWave 09:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Movie? I thought this was a play? -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh right, He could come into the movie mid-way and die near the mid-end. --NXWave 20:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Somehow, I imagine that the part of the grue would be played by some gruesome sound effects of the growling, chewing, bone-crunching variety. --The Acceptable 
Cainad 
(Fnord) 16:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but we'd need a "Zork Narrator" guy. Hell, I could do that, and I'm sure that The UnIdiot would help. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:53, Nov 21
- coughs * ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
21/11/2007 @ 21:22
I'll participate, but only if all I say is "...with SAVINGS!!!" -- 
04:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't anyone pay attention to the Alexa ratings? Your'e stuck in the 7,000's . Lose the grue, Chuck Norris, Capatain Obvious, Oscar Wilde, Star Trek references, Star Wars jpegs, kitten huffing and two thirds of your asshole admins and maybe, just maybe you have a chance at the 3,000 ranking, but no, your entire ensemble is so incongruous that you might as well rename your website "Lost in the 70's with Donny Osmond and his histrionic excuse for a sister". Oh never mind Nobody cares --75.136.131.42 06:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- And tell us, How can you reinvent Uncyclopedia? --NXWave 06:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Duh, dude, you're just talking about old in-jokes. We don't like 'em nowadays, but n00bs tend to use 'em, and we're not gonna delete the old articles just 'cuz they're old. And the asshole admins like Frosty are what gives the place its spirit. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:23 Nov 22, 2007
- It's not a matter of reinventing, it's re-directing. Old artist's trick of leading the eye through the picture/website. First you imagine yourself as a newcomer to Uncyclopedia. Where does your customer go to first? If it's Random page, then every random page should be a feature worthy page, not 30 entries about Tom Cruise, the actress and Oprah, the hungry hungry hippo. After 3 stupid articles, most customers move on to something less retarded no matter how funny the featured article was. You have to get their attention and keep it. Maybe the site needs to add a committee of admins who search out and find good articles to put in the random guff.--75.136.131.42 06:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Lets test that (random page x3): Ham sandwich, Andy Milonakis, Wesley Willis. Two of which I just put on the lounge, destined for VFD (I'm saving the ham sandwich. I have to, I belong to Save the Ham Sandwich). So, for once, what the IP is saying has some small speck of merit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Here's my random draw from 30. How about that 3 chapter entry? Comic gold? Fuck no, but here they are in all their 'should have been deleted in 2004 glory': International Emo Week, G8, Sword of the Kings: The Legend of the Man in the Yellow Hat. How did the Man in the Yellow Hat escape detection from the powers that be? It has everything, 3 tiny chapters consisting of Oprah, Oscar, and Orson, all the criteria for deletion! But no. Hell no. See what I mean? 75.136.131.42
- Immediate proof that we have to have a n00b in the play, I mean the movie. Maybe several n00bs, all played by me, the master in disguise. Pieface 16:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mr. IP, you can complain about Uncyc all you want, but when it gets right down to it, you have 2 options. One is to leave the site and never come back, if you really think it's that bad. Number two is to go down to either Special:Newpages, Special:Shortpages, Special:Ancientpages, or any other special page you can find, and start doing some productive work on VFD, QVFD, and ICU. It's easy to complain about the problem, but to go out and try to help fix it gets far more done. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:40, Nov 22
- True. And to be honest, when I see someone else on uncyclopedia (and say what an interesting site it is, must check it out sometime) they just seem to type something they know about in the search box, and read whatever comes up, and follow interesting-looking wikilinks after that. Random page occasionally gets you good stuff, but generally gets you random stuff you're not interested in. And as LedBalloon said, we can only deal with these bad articles if we can find them, so VFD away - it's a wiki, {{sofixit}}. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 19:21, 22 Nov 2007
- Listen to yourself. "Random page occassionally gets you good stuff." And the purpose this serves is.....? BTW I'm not complaining, just suggesting ways to direct viewers away from the 75% content that prevents them from returning here. There's so much quality hidden away here , things no one would think to type into the search box. I don't believe the current qvd vd vfd etc. system is effective enough to improve your ratings. It's like raking leaves with a fork. Or emptying Lake Michigan with a teaspoon. --75.136.131.42 04:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Person'lly I hate Special:Random. It detracts from the good and delivers the bad. Of course, I'm not sure if visitors navigate via the Main Page and Wikilinks or Special:Random, but if it's the latter, it's really not a good impression. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:56 Nov 23, 2007
- You're looking at it from the wrong direction. It's the perfect way to find crap for VFD. Still... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- You guys are totally missing the point. I talk with kids from my town all the time about uncyc (got three of them to join) and they love the randompage button. The thing is, nobody clicks it a bunch of times and carefully reads each page they find. I'd watch kids skim through a few pages and have a quick laugh at whatever funny was there before the teacher came over and they had to minimize the window and bring up wikipedia again. It's those little bits of comedy that people going to special:Random will find, and love. Oh, and before I joined, I read featured pages and the wikilinks on them. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:24, Nov 23
- You guys are totally missing the point. I talk with kids from my town all the time about uncyc (got three of them to join) and they love the randompage button. The thing is, nobody clicks it a bunch of times and carefully reads each page they find. I'd watch kids skim through a few pages and have a quick laugh at whatever funny was there before the teacher came over and they had to minimize the window and bring up wikipedia again. It's those little bits of comedy that people going to special:Random will find, and love. Oh, and before I joined, I read featured pages and the wikilinks on them. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
- You're looking at it from the wrong direction. It's the perfect way to find crap for VFD. Still... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Person'lly I hate Special:Random. It detracts from the good and delivers the bad. Of course, I'm not sure if visitors navigate via the Main Page and Wikilinks or Special:Random, but if it's the latter, it's really not a good impression. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:56 Nov 23, 2007
- Listen to yourself. "Random page occassionally gets you good stuff." And the purpose this serves is.....? BTW I'm not complaining, just suggesting ways to direct viewers away from the 75% content that prevents them from returning here. There's so much quality hidden away here , things no one would think to type into the search box. I don't believe the current qvd vd vfd etc. system is effective enough to improve your ratings. It's like raking leaves with a fork. Or emptying Lake Michigan with a teaspoon. --75.136.131.42 04:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- True. And to be honest, when I see someone else on uncyclopedia (and say what an interesting site it is, must check it out sometime) they just seem to type something they know about in the search box, and read whatever comes up, and follow interesting-looking wikilinks after that. Random page occasionally gets you good stuff, but generally gets you random stuff you're not interested in. And as LedBalloon said, we can only deal with these bad articles if we can find them, so VFD away - it's a wiki, {{sofixit}}. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 19:21, 22 Nov 2007
- Mr. IP, you can complain about Uncyc all you want, but when it gets right down to it, you have 2 options. One is to leave the site and never come back, if you really think it's that bad. Number two is to go down to either Special:Newpages, Special:Shortpages, Special:Ancientpages, or any other special page you can find, and start doing some productive work on VFD, QVFD, and ICU. It's easy to complain about the problem, but to go out and try to help fix it gets far more done. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
- Immediate proof that we have to have a n00b in the play, I mean the movie. Maybe several n00bs, all played by me, the master in disguise. Pieface 16:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Here's my random draw from 30. How about that 3 chapter entry? Comic gold? Fuck no, but here they are in all their 'should have been deleted in 2004 glory': International Emo Week, G8, Sword of the Kings: The Legend of the Man in the Yellow Hat. How did the Man in the Yellow Hat escape detection from the powers that be? It has everything, 3 tiny chapters consisting of Oprah, Oscar, and Orson, all the criteria for deletion! But no. Hell no. See what I mean? 75.136.131.42
- Lets test that (random page x3): Ham sandwich, Andy Milonakis, Wesley Willis. Two of which I just put on the lounge, destined for VFD (I'm saving the ham sandwich. I have to, I belong to Save the Ham Sandwich). So, for once, what the IP is saying has some small speck of merit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of reinventing, it's re-directing. Old artist's trick of leading the eye through the picture/website. First you imagine yourself as a newcomer to Uncyclopedia. Where does your customer go to first? If it's Random page, then every random page should be a feature worthy page, not 30 entries about Tom Cruise, the actress and Oprah, the hungry hungry hippo. After 3 stupid articles, most customers move on to something less retarded no matter how funny the featured article was. You have to get their attention and keep it. Maybe the site needs to add a committee of admins who search out and find good articles to put in the random guff.--75.136.131.42 06:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
BAGSY...
...the part of PCP! WOO! *gets out 00ber microphone* 
sleepygamer Phencyclidine TALK STUFF 06:07, Nov 26
5 Reasons why I should Play all the prts
- I was the baker in our school's production of Joseph and thew Amazing Technicolor Overcoat. My performance was described as "shoddy".
- I bring much needed sex appeal.
- Codeine is locked in my basement.
- I don't have a basement.
- I'm a method actor. Just let me get in character...look at me I'm a Jew! Look at my spinny Jew star!... That was my Mordillo impression. -- bloody Ape (balkanize) (Riot Porn) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)