User talk:AE/Archives/2

This sofa was provided for Under user's convenience.

Wait, um why did you archive?

Pardon me saying, but I see no reason why you needed to archive your talk page. It had only ten entries. Most archives are at least 40, most upwards of 50. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:15, Dec 6

/me pops in Yeah, stop archiving ya pansy.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 01:18)

I like to keep things short and the headers had semi-long discussions. And yeah, Cajek: ya stop archiving as well Mr 10 Header, oh well, I guess I shall refer to myself as "Mr 10 Header". --Æ 01:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, that fine. Congrats on your NotM lead, you deserve it! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:27, Dec 6

Thanks, and is my userpage funny now... better than your friend's userpage?--Æ 01:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

It gets a chuckle, but UnTalented's page is a like a whole story. So funny! I suggest you read it if you haven't! Good Stuff! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:34, Dec 6

I agree. Both of our userpages are still funny but in different ways--Æ 02:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for voting

	MrN9000 has awarded you with this rather nicely coloured boxy thing to thank you for voting and helping to get The Color Problem featured on the front page.
	*Please do not mention the colour/color problem. It's not an issue. Really.

MrN 17:20, Dec 6

*STAR WARS theme plays...*

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.... It is a period of Galactic unrest. Star Wars was nominated for VFH, but nearly failed, thanks to the efforts of the evil lord Darth Vader. However, during the nomination, Princess Prince TheLedBalloon managed to steal secret plans to the Empire's ultimate weapon, the DEATH STAR. Pursued by the Empire's sinister agents, he races home aboard his starship, custodian of the stolen plans that can save his people and restore freedom to the galaxy...

I can't believe it finally got featured, either. Thanks for voting!

Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:03, Dec 7

Making your escape

Hi AE, so this is your talk page huh? /me looks around. You could have provided a sofa or something. No matter, I'll stand.

Anyways, about your Escape From Prison modifications: The main thing that was funny about the "final solution suggestion" thing was that header for it - you know what the final solution refers to, right? Anyway, if you're planning to add on a "staying on the run" section afterwards, I'd leave it out - you're right, it wouldn't fit, and as long as the staying on the lam section contains a few jokes, I think it will be better for the article, give it a bit more content. Hope this helps - keep going. Oh, and while it looks like you've been leapfrogged in NotM at the moment, you deserved my vote - good n00bing! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to not get back to you sooner - I saw you asked about adding an "examples" section to this article, and did mean to respond before now. I don't think you should. If you add a decent "on the run" section, and expand the earlier part a bit, as recommended, the article should be a nice length. You have to be wary of getting too lengthy, which I think I did with HowTo:Fuck Off. Hope that helps and isn't, like, waaayyyyy too late! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 21:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Unicorns-slash-rainbows and happiness

	Oh Hell No. LOCK THE WINDOWS AND BOLT THE DOORS, SOME HORNY BASTARD IS COMING TO RAPE YOU!
	I KNOW IT DOESN'T SOUND SERIOUS NOW, BUT JUST WAIT TILL YOU'RE ON THE BUSINESS END OF THAT HORN

Hey AE, I'm glad you like my articles! :D

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 8 / 15:40)

The War

Hmm... maybe we should create banners for each side of our war? You know, you make a banner for the House of... whatever you want to call yours, and I'll make one for the House of Spork. Eh? How's it sound?--The Duke of Spork 17:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Ah, so that's what it is about. M'pologies, but I met Ggarfield first :P --The Duke of Spork 18:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm being warred upon for meeting somebody first? --The Duke of Spork 19:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Squirm!--The Duke of Spork 19:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Er. Thanks

For your nomination. I think you have made an error however. I'm not sure I'm ready for this one yet... Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful, that you have liked the things which I have been doing, but I have only been here for less than a month and well, anyway, at least on of the reasons you gave for your nomination was incorrect. I have actually not started welcoming new users at all. I do talk to a few of the N00bs, but have never posted a welcome message. I intend to start doing this, but thought that I should get more experience around the place first. Would look a bit silly if people started asking me questions which I did not know the answer to and all...

Can I make a request? Please consider removing my nomination as I think your in-danger of making both of us look, well a little bit silly.

It not that I'm not grateful of the encouragement. I just don't think that you have the experience yet to make an accurate nomination in UN:UM. I hope you don't think I'm being rude, that's defiantly not my intention.  :)

RE, your N00b of the month. If I had to place my bet today, rather than when I voted, it would be on you. I will not be changing it though, I don't do that. There has been some "funny business" going on which I'm sure your aware of. Make sure you steer clear of that sort of thing...

Weather or not you do remove my nomination is (of course) entirely up to you, but consider my reasons when you make your decision. MrN 23:37, Dec 8

Done. Once again man, I'm really sorry about fucking that nom up--Æ 00:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Christ, Man

Cut down on the Featured Article Nomination spam, would you? More than one nomination under voting per user is a little excessive. Quality, not quantity.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)  

Eh, sure, but you realize they're all doing well. And you're not voting against the article because I nominated it Mr. EugeneKay? If so, shame--Æ 00:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, I just default to voting against unless it has real merit. Though it seems like I hate you, I don't. If I did, This would be a giant flame on how much of a cunt you are. But Nobody Cares about that shite.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)  

Got to second that from EugeneKay... I did notice that you had been submitting rather a lot... How many nominations do other users make? Try to keep what you do along the same lines as other people... If you find a really brilliant one which has not been nominated, then fair enough. But keep it a bit more low key... MrN 00:42, Dec 9

I've been on the hunt recently, and I've been trying to find good articles to nominate. They all seem to be doing pretty well on VFH though. I looked at the rules and there is no section about how many articles you can nominate. If I should really not nominate so many articles at a time, I won't do it--Æ 00:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hea, there are not really that many rules for most things around here. That's one of the good things about this place. So long as your not a dick your OK. People can just get a bit pissed off if they consider that your wasting everyone's time a bit... I guess someone might think that a new user that does not have that much experience as to what's likely to succeed probably should not have 4 noms on the go at the same time...

Hmm, I just had a look at your noms... You think they are doing OK?

United States presidential election, 1840. -That might make it!

United States presidential election, 1960. -Don't think this will...

MF DOOM -Don't think this will make it...

HowTo:Be a hipster -Don't think this will make it either.

I might be wrong. We will see won't we! But. My point is that as your judgement is not that great, due to you being new, it's probably a good idea to limit the noms to stuff which you think is absolutely brilliant. Well, not just stuff which you think is brilliant, but stuff which you think others will like also. I guess you can't really know what others will like until you have been around a while. That's why I say to limit em a bit. People would not mind if there were all brilliant noms. But in my opinion, they are not that great. You might get the first one though! Like I said about the rules just cos there is no rule which says you should not do something, that's not the point... You got to use your loaf, you know that thing on top of your neck to decide if what your doing is a good idea.... Do ya get me drift man? MrN 00:59, Dec 9

Well, they're all new, and they aren't doing terrible. Just wait a few days before you can say it will fail or not. Also, as you said, there is no "rules". If I'm pissing people off, I apologize, and please realize these aren't my intentions--Æ 01:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

It's cool. I'm only bothering to put this much effort into talking to ya cos I think your "worth the effort"... I'm just trying to give you a feel for how things work around here, that's all... As per the noms... Well.. We will see... As for "Are you pissing people off"? Well I think is says in the "rules" that you can tell if your being a dick, if only slightly being a dick when people start "telling you" your a dick! Not that I think your a dick of course... Anyways... I would not make any more noms for a while if I were you... But it's your call. MrN 01:16, Dec 9

Thanks for the advice. I'm not going to nom for a few days--Æ 01:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Maybe even leave it a week... Unless you find a brilliant one...  ;) MrN 02:11, Dec 9

Your mods to the guide

Just thought I would mention that we need to remember that the person reading this is likely to be a rather new user... As such, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to give them too many links to the parts of Uncyc which they probably should not be messing with yet? What do you think? MrN 01:23, Dec 9

Good idea, I'll continue my work on it.--Æ 01:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

My Tip

Probably the best thing to do might be to work on doing some really good pee-reviews... That always makes people popular... And I mean really good pee reviews. Quality is more important than quantity. In everything. Pick an article which is worthy of your efforts, and do a really good one, or two... MrN 02:14, Dec 9

I've been lurking around at Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Current Pees for a while, and I've been trying to find a good article to review. I have to agree with you entirley Quality > Quantity and eventually, I'll find some good articles to offer helpful critiques--Æ 02:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

It's OK to review the less great ones also, just put an amount of effort into your review relative to how much effort the person has put into the article. Like it says in our guide... MrN 02:30, Dec 9

re: User:Cajek/Pee

Hey AE, I'm glad you've taken an interest in my scoreboard. Which are your two reviews?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 14:13)

Stages of Grief and Penis--Æ 14:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

RE the new box!

Yea! sry about that, I just click go to fix my error, and got an edit conflict with you fixing it! Stupid me... MrN 18:24, Dec 10

No problem--Æ 18:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Do you think it's better now I changed "HELP" to FAQ? on the main menuMrN 18:31, Dec 10

Yes--Æ 18:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

WTF?

Hello Friend, how goes it? I'm glad to see you are looking so well these days. MuahahahHHHAhAHHHAAAHHAAA!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!111111111!!!1!!! BTW, did you know that an expanding signature is frowned upon by everyone who is anyone, including all Web Developers (such as myself), Hax0rs, the W3C, Firefox, Canadian Jesus, Chuck Norris, Sen. Obama, Sen. Clinton, Sen. Fiengold, Drew Barrymore, and Karl Marx? --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 19:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't listen to you anymore Mr Ggarfield--Æ 20:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

You never did. BTW, Garfield's my last name, and has nothing to do with cats and more to do with former President James A. Garfield of the United States. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 20:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't care--Æ 20:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Swell, old chap. I see the golden boy has a mean streak.

--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 20:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Fun fact: I don't care--Æ 20:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

For the record, G-Dubs, your sig actually looks too long to me. Have a look at UN:SIG, and that 55 X rule. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:15, Dec 10

Fixed it. Thanks for the note.

Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 22:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Your sig is still annoying. AE's is sleek and sexy, expanding or not! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:14, Dec 10

Sleek? Sexy? Expanding? Sounds like my fishing rod. Yeah, you heard me right. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:15, Dec 10

What Mr. Sir (Damn, I need one of these titles myself) UnIdiot said. Also, can you whore for me

Instead

--Æ 22:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, your talk page link in your sig doesn't work, AE. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:23, Dec 10

That's because it is my talkpage--Æ 22:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Woah, I never noticed sigs did that. Props to you! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:25, Dec 10

That's SIR UnIdiot to you Mr noob. Hmm, wonder how you might be able to get one of these fancy tittle things so all the nice people stop treating you like a noob... I almost said what UnIdiot just did myself! Luckily he beat me to it! MrN 22:31, Dec 10

Yep, I'm KUN Sir UnIdiot the 2nd royal marquis. Pleased to serve you. Wipe you feet on the mat before entering the throne room. Honestly though, I've only been around 2 1/2 months.- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:36, Dec 10

But I am Marquis! No copy. Anyway, sorry about the whoring AE, and the smear campaign...I like my signature as it is though. it so pwns your sig! (jk) --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 18:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I am lotoflols

i am happy u lik my story i want to win an award plese try to give me 1 or vot for me for somthing.LotofLOLS 00:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Once again man, thank you so much for your signature!!! --Æ 01:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

NotM

I just left a dire message on Mr. Garfield's talk page regarding the severe headache I'm having from all of this NotM business. I don't know how much exactly you've contributed to this whole mess, but I'll be watching both of you very carefully from now on, so make sure you don't contribute anything else to this whole Drama. Thanks. ~ 09:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, sorry--Æ 19:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

IotM?

Hey, uh, thanks for the nomination! I had no idea this existed. I guess if the month is half over and nobody's even nominated then... Well anyway, thanks for another award, maybe!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 20:03)

No problem--Æ 20:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm actually starting to feel a bit silly about turning down your nom now! At least then I would have had a nom for something this month, even if I don't win... (cry, cry)... You're doing a really good job with a lot of stuff around the place AE, and it's really starting to show... Keep it up! MrN 20:08, Dec 12

He nommed you for UotM, right? You would've lost anyway. The competition this month and next month will be very very strong. Those two are near-admins.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 20:19)

Yes UotM... Hell, I know... I had no chance. I'm just feeling left out! Your up for two how many awards this month Cajek??? MrN 20:24, Dec 12

Near-admins? Where the fuck did you get that from? The only way I'm near an admin is I live in the same small country as the likes of SBU and Codeine! Nice of you to say, mind). Oh, and excuse the drive-by commenting here AE! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 21:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

One serious award, one "serious" award, and one award that people never vote on, lol. Don't feel left out! You're only, like, two months old!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 20:30)

One actually. I joined on the 7th November. Maybe we should leave poor AE's talk page alone and let him get back to the serious business which might win him n00b of the month.MrN 20:35, Dec 12

I think I was somewhat of an oddball when I came onto the site. See, while you n00bs joined and started working like crazy here, I joined and hung around the forums for two months. Then I created PEEING and continued to hang around, sometimes adding user talk pages into the mix. You're making me feel bad. /me cries. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

It's okay Boomer, it's okay, go to the corner so we can't see you it's okay.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 22:49)

Thank you for yet another nomination, AE! Woot!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 13 / 00:06)