Uncyclopedia talk:CVP/Archive 1

Vandalopedia

This site should be created ASAP so all the vandals who can string two letters together can be sent there to annoy each other rather than us, and the rest of us can amuse ourselves by rendering the articles into proper Uncyclopedia/Wikipedia styles

How about "Trashopedia," so those vandals who cannot string two letters together blah blah blah ibid.? POWER TO THE ILLITERATE!!!@! -- Rabbi Ezra Davidson, 192.115.56.17 15:08, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Armenian Mom!

Other people found this page funny, I did not orginally add references to it in Cindy Sheehan and Fox TV. Maybe they have a better sense of humor than you quinns

How long do pages stay on CVP?

Isra1337 thinks that articles are removed from CVP as soon as the attack stops, but the oldest article on CVP is dated 2 May 2005. How exactly does CVP work? - Sikon 06:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Historically, they stay on until someone requests they be removed so an article can be created. In many cases this will probably not happen (several are instances of vanity or just plain crap) so the protected redirects could remain a permanent fixture (see wikipedia's CVPesque category, they might keep them forever), though I suppose the list of 'current' CVP'd pages could be archived after a few months so as not to spam the main CVP page. --Splaka 06:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Just a point

Runescape and possibly some others do not now count as CVP's, so could they be removed? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Sure, list them. We're lazy. --Splaka 05:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, there's Runescape... ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 08:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Conrad Devonshire

The page "Conrad Devonshire" was not a vanity page. It was submitted here by some idiot who was angry with me for nominating a certain article on Wikipedia for deletion.--Conrad Devonshire 04:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Writing about non-notable people, in a positive or a negative way, is still vanity in the eyes of our vanity policies ("nn-bio" on en.wp). One writes about oneself to put one up, and writes negatively about one's non-notable "friends" and enemies also to put oneself up. Or just look at it as a blanket term for non-notability. --Splaka 04:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Well I just wanted to make it clear that I didn't submit it.--Conrad Devonshire 05:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Why?

All the good article names are in the CVP. People need to know about Fuck Norris!!! 58.178.254.124 04:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Namechange

Shouldn't this page be named "Constantly Recreated Pages"? The name "Constantly Vandalised Pages" makes it sound like a list of pages that vandals most often target.--Conrad Devonshire ^Talk 20:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Alexander Siddig

By "vanity" I'm assuming you mean worthless, useless, or futile, or that I like my writing to much to let it go. Well, fuck you, too. :-P Geez, I was just trying to add a little humor to this boring-ass site. Excuuuuse the fuck outta me. --172.146.81.207 10:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

This page DEFINITELY needs to be cvpd!

This page does not exist - its been recreated like 20 times!--67.67.218.149 04:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The purpose of that title is that the corresponding article doesn't exist. If it's created as a CVP redirect page, then it exists, which defeats the purpose altogether. --EvilZak 06:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

No Sonic characters?

Then why are Sonic the Hedgehog, Dr. Eggman and Knuckles the Echidna allowed to exist, while Tails and Amy Rose arn't? --200.106.209.30 00:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Because Amy Rose's and Tails's article were created several times filled only with shit. "[I]f you would like to create a page that has been protected, create it somewhere else and ask to have it moved, or contact an admin first to get it unprotected." --sp unit 262 04:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Ukrainian girls

Has been created four times and sucked every single one, so it should probably be CVP'd.--Mister Nosey 03:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Hitler

Recreated five times.--Mister Nosey 02:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

CmdrTaco

It's redirecting here, but there's no entry for it. --128.138.25.220 23:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I think that might be because it was constantly being vandalised. In fact, you might even call it a Constantly Vandalised Page. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 11/5 23:21

French military defeats

This page definitely has some potential to be a good page. I was wondering if any admins would unprotect it so i could work on it? Im not gonna make it plaigirized or stupid but i have some ideas. --User:Thefonduchicken12 22:32, 6 November 2006 {UTC}

Start it here. When it's finished, ask an admin to move it to the proper page. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 11/7 00:04

Why Atlantic Records "Suck"...

If you want to see why people keep writing "You Suck" on the Atlantic Records page, then you should watch the "White and Nerdy" music video by Weird Al. He wrote "You Suck" on the Atlantic Records page in Wikipedia, causing this trend.

No idea why this is on CVP. One of the other Uncyclopedias was able to parody that incident http://psyklopedin.org/wiki/Atlantic_Records and the world didn't end. --205.150.76.14 01:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Leeroy Jenkins

Why the fuck is this in the CVP? 58.178.47.218 01:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The First Rule of Dumbassery:

Assume that the qualities of all the other items in a like-group do not apply to an object in the same group.

I hope this clears things up for you. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 11/17 01:42

Alright chums, let's do this. STUUUPIIID MEEEMEEE!!! oTHErONE (Contribs) 08:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

So is just about everything else on Uncyclopedia.

Listen, I'm really sorry, but why does Leeroy Jenkins redirect here... I'm a bit slow, so please... Be kind. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Groove Bones (talk • contribs) 08:29, 29 June 2007

I moved your comment down to the appropriate section. I believe that the answer to your question can be found above, and on the top of this page. However, reading comprehension will be required to understand it all. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/29 14:04

He-man redirects here

For some strange reason, He-man redirects here. Not sure why, as it is not mentioned anywhere on the CVP page list.

The Tool Bar Dosen't Show Up!

I tried to edit a pic in a page I made, but the toolbar disappeared! Where'd it go?

Borat The Game CVP request

Borat The Game has been huffed 11 times. Could someone please CVP it? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Still was getting huffed often, CVP it soon. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

About the notice at top

{{editprotected}} Why not change "deleted" to "huffed"? Rickyrab 19:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

This is friggin' stupid

Why do they remove Sonic The Hedgehog characters??!! There is no reason that when anyone re-creates it, they keep deleting it. Stop it now. Let them re-create it. If this is their favorite characters, let them re-create it. There is no need for you to delete it on purpose. XxPanzerOutlawxx 14:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

No, you're friggin' stupid. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/6 20:30

Then why did they have to remove two of Wikipedian's favorite characters? XxPanzerOutlawxx 16:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm gonna have to back up what Famine said, along with a little bit of "the creators of the article bypassed funny in favor of what I call 'written fellatio of the subject'". Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 04:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Naruto and Narutard

Who deleted these? Could someone restore the Naruto page that was huffed and CVP it? It's been the best page for a long time....--71.107.217.63 01:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

No, see, you CVP pages that were never good in any of their multiple revisions. The word you want is "protect". I suspect it may become CVP anyway though... Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 05:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

If you trackback Naruto @ VFD history, you'll find it unfairly deleted. Most of the reason was "i hate anime" and such. Plus the poll only goes for one day. Try one week and it will be proven otherwise. Reinn 08:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to write the best article ever here. When you're done, let me know, and if it doesn't suck I'll move it to the proper place. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/29 14:07

So... basically there's just no Naruto article until someone feels prepared to come up with one. Honestly, though, I don't think you're going to get anything better than what was already there (btw, yeah, I did try to put something together, and it wasn't any good). The original article wasn't actually that bad - as was mentioned, most of the reasons given for deletion were "i hate anime" and variants. And yet now it lies in a void of non-existance, and I sincerely doubt the narutophobes who wanted it down will ever really be appeased... hmm... Feebas factor 16:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, the trick would be keeping from even reaching VFD in the first place. If you want there to be a Naruto article, it has to be really fucking good. Like, better than sex. Even for people who've never heard of the show. And that does not mean "lavish praise for fan favorite characters and mockery of the designated comic relief". You may have to take it in a completely different direction a la My Chemical Romance or Anime. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 04:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Irish Evil

Superficially, this is stupid. However, it has a history. This history includes reputable sources like qwantz.com. http://www.qwantz.com/index.pl?comic=816 Also, one version (reverted within one minute. Aren't wikipedians awesome?) showed how some permutations can be made beyond the basic prank, albeit at a limited level, and could be built on, potentially becoming a fairly cool meme. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evil&oldid=139100681 – Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.20.97.220 (talk • contribs)

WHAT!

I come on Uncyclopedia because I love that fact that most of this is considered "vandalism" by Wikipedia terms I didn't know they block stuff for vandalism.That's ridiculus (yes I spelled it wrong get over it)

Welcome. Please take a moment to read these articles. They might shed some light on why this is the case. If you don't know what we're about, I bet there's an article here somewhere which will explain it. (Hint - we're not anti-wikipedia, nor are we Vandelopedia - you might have been misinformed.) And it's spelled ridiculous. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/30 01:11

At least let Amy Rose live!

Removing Tails is one thing, but to Amy? C'mon man! At least let her live! She is my favorite character, let alone Sonic's girlfriend! Just let her live. It means a lot to Sonic... and me.he is a Sonic character. XxPanzerOutlawxx 14:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Getting a page unCVPed is easy. Just rewrite it in your userspace and ask an admin to unprotect it. If the rewrite is any good, they should be happy to do this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks. XxPanzerOutlawxx 19:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Question

I recently put up Drew Pickles on QVFD and it was eventually deleted. I am now worried that the original author of it may re-create it, with the same plagiarized (and un-funny) material. Could it be marked as a CVP now, or would it need to be recreated again before that could happen? Frankie! 20:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Why was Naruto CVP'ed?

It could of been a good article I was gonna make one anyways. -- CartoonDiablo

Easy. Because there's two people who want to write about Naruto: fans of Naruto, who tend to skip the funny in favor of written fellatio of the topic matter, and people who hate Naruto, who tend to skip the funny in out-and-out insulting the show without satire. If you can manage to avoid both of these states, write up a draft in your userspace. And get it Pee Reviewed before asking an admin to bring it in. Twice. Also, this was already brought up somewhere else. Your browser has a search function, most likely: USE IT. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 04:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Interwiki addition request

{{Editprotected}} We want to add interwiki, ko:백괴사전:생성 보호 문서 on this document. Recently, there was similar edit war on Korean Uncyclopedia, and we created a guideline for this. Due to protection of this document, I want somebody to add this interwiki, please. --Peremen 16:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Done - better late than never! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

What about using Uncyclopedia:Deleted protected pages instead?

Uncyclopedia:Deleted protected pages actually keeps the page protected while it is deleted and keeps the link red, so that users creating new pages would be discouraged from linking to them. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

About those DPPs...one of them is "This page does not exist." I'd like to request that it's unDPP'd, so I can move my PLS entry to there. If you really don't want me to make that link blue, I'll just leave the page at "The nonexistent page", but I'd prefer to have it in a more betterer namespace. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Lucario

True information: Steel/Fighting Pokemon that focuses on special attacks.

Uncyc information in at least three separate incarnations:

• Lucario is dedicated to killing off children's shows' mascots.
• Lucario started a band that somehow incorporates Goatse.
• Lucario is your new lord and master and can beat Chuck Norris with only an eyebrow.

I don't see this getting better. Ever. No, not even then. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 04:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

WTF, this is even worse than whatever it used to be. Jesus H. Christ. Roman Dog Bird 04:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

BARNEY!

Why was the Barney article deleted??? Why does the internet always destroy its own hilarious Barney parodies? Whaaaa!

Just write up a draft, get it Pee Reviewed until you think it's good, show it to an admin, and BAM! You just revived an article! HOORAH! LET's PARTY!

Miles "Tails" Prower

It should now be redirected to Tails the Fox.

Or Tails the Fox should be moved there.

--User:Banjo2e/SIGGY 17:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

RuneScape deleted again

I just noticed that RuneScape and its former redirect Runescape were deleted. (They are currently listed under the "former CVP" section.) I would like to request that these pages be CVP'd again, just to protect the Uncyclopedia community from noobs. Pentium5dot1 02:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, so I presume it shouldn't be listed under "former CVP" anymore... Pentium5dot1 04:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC) This will be relisted as a proper request below. Pentium5dot1 23:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Typo

There's a typo in the first paragraph of this article. The 2nd "Uncyclopedia" is missing it's "i."--YeOldeLuke 23:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

{{editprotected}}

1. Please remove RuneScape from the "former CVP" section, as it is now an active CVP (per my request above).
2. Please add Naruto to the "former CVP" section (or provide a good reason why this shouldn't be done).
3. Section number 14 on Uncyclopedia:CVP/archive2 appears to have an empty title per the TOC, and it appears to be nonexistent in terms of content (section 13 is here). Should this be fixed?
4. Please consider unCVPing Hello and redirecting it to Hello World instead.

Pentium5dot1 23:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

P.S. This question doesn't fall under the scope of the {{editprotected}}, but what should be done with the handful of redlinks that exist within the CVP archives? Pentium5dot1 00:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawing this block of requests. Pentium5dot1 00:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Non-Huffable Kitten

Since being voted for deletion on September 28, this article has been recreated and deleted at least 9 times. In my opinion, this is worthy of an entry on CVP. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 01:53, Nov. 23, 2007

Typo

{{editprotected}} The entry for "Shoop da woop" was mistakenly created with the name of the page placed in a level 2 section header instead of the level 3 header used for all the other entries. Pentium5dot1 18:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Halo 3

This article has been recreated 13 times (mostly shitty, QVFD-able one liners) since the original creation was first deleted, and it probably will be recreated again. To prevent this, I think Halo 3 should be added to the CVP as soon as possible. User:Slavemaster2 9:03 PM 23 November 2007

i think all websites should not be blocked \

The Halo series

None of the CVP'd Halo pages are on the CVP list. Please fix this. KTHXBAI. --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 06:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Shoop Da Whoop

I found this article with NRV, and rewrote it, so that it still deserved a Mona Bean Half Finished template, but wasn't NRV. My version was something about a martial art practiced by a tribe of Africans. Was it deleted and CVP'd, or was it vandalized, THEN deleted and CVP'd? 209.180.233.206 20:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please register an account, write a draft in a user subpage, then ask for a Pee Review. Pentium5dot1 22:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)