Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Eat People

Article: Why?:Eat People	Score: -3 Cannibals-in-training
Nominated by:	SPY Administrator (Complain\|I rock\|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 17:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 1	Self nom and for. I got a pretty good pee review, and since then the list has died, which was the main detractor from it. Also, I've had a second review pending for some time. I really think this is an excellent article, and probably deserves featuring. (Note that banjo2E was once me, and therefore all those edits on the page count as mine.) --SPY Administrator (Complain\|I rock\|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 17:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 4	Reluctant against. It brings up a lot of examples of eating people, from historical references to science fiction, but it just didn't make me giggle while doing so. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:39 Oct 17, 2007 Against. Similar to the good Doctor, I think it's not a bad article, but just didn't find it funny. Sorry. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Against -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Against - Even though I love eating people, this didn't cut it for me. (no pun intended) --AAA! (AAAA) 23:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I know that this has had time and effort put into it, but it doesn't seem there. sigh • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Okay. Judging from the reactions, I still have a bit to go. I'll try to add some obvious laugh attack zones and bad puns to the article. Or something. Well, whatever. The point is, I'll make it funnier, and subsequently resubmit it to VFH when it is truly ready. --SPY Administrator (Complain\|I rock\|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 19:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)