Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia Needs More Snakes

Article: Uncyclopedia Needs More Snakes	Score: 9
Nominated by:	User:Mrthejazz/sig 18:20, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
For: 16	For Sadistic Wolf created it, I did some minor edits, it did well on Pee Review...I'm thinking it's ready.User:Mrthejazz/sig 18:20, June 7, 2010 (UTC) Self For. Because I'm a vain motha bitch. Sadistic Wolf 18:32, June 7, 2010 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:56, 8 June 2010 For. Great article. Poor Snakey. Yoyoddd 23:51, June 10, 2010 (UTC) Fosho —Pelozurian (talk) 23:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC) For. Damn Christians putting a bad name on snakes. Wilytank 00:12, June 12, 2010 (UTC) For. Heh. Lawlz. And you should come over the Illogicopedia, as we need a userbase. I mean, you could get featured! ~ Readmesoon 00:46, June 12, 2010 (UTC) Before I became semi-literate, I did in fact have an Illogicopedia account. And I was featured. Twice. --Sadistic Wolf 15:21, June 14, 2010 (UTC) For Saw that Selma Hyeck scared-of-a-snake news item, made me think of this. Uncy does need more snakes. Aleister in Chains 10:15 12 6 MMX For Lovely stuff. --Black Flamingo 18:21, June 13, 2010 (UTC) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 07:48, June 15, 2010 (UTC) For. This "Snakey" is just the kinda guy Uncylopedia needs as a contributor. Somebody go write some snake related stories so the we might entice him to join! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 19 Jun 2010 ~ 21:16 (UTC) For. I like big snakes, and I cannot bring myself to lie. OMFG Rabies turtle! \| Speak... 19:13, June 21, 2010 (UTC) For. im sick of uncyclopedia not having enough mother fucking snakes on this mother fucking site. -Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 22:02, June 25, 2010 (UTC) Snake? Snake?! SNAAAAAAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Matfen 20:05, June 27, 2010 (UTC) For. I don't know why... Saberwolf116 15:25, July 1, 2010 (UTC) Absolutely. I have a snake named Snakey. He's a corn snake, and he's really cute. Except sometimes he bites, which isn't that cute. Love,
Against: 7	Against. Not a fan of articles promoting this site getting featured. Sorry, *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 13:23, June 12, 2010 (UTC) Are you kidding? It's obviously protesting the site for not having enough snakes. --Wilytank 14:39, June 14, 2010 (UTC) Actually, it's a biting social commentary about the downright ignorance towards snakes and their rich culture and heritage. --Sadistic Wolf 15:21, June 14, 2010 (UTC) Actually, it's a tuna sandwhich on rye with a side of Dijon mayonnaise. User:Mrthejazz/sig 20:35, June 14, 2010 (UTC) Actually, it's over 9000. </originality> --Sadistic Wolf 15:15, June 15, 2010 (UTC) So there I was sitting in my fucking room, doing the Solid Snake thing with the wiki editing and the dogs, right? Like boring nerd shit, and this snake just comes out of nowhere and tries to get me to put more snake articles on Uncyclopedia... User:Mrthejazz/sig 17:54, June 15, 2010 (UTC) Against. Started very well, but sort of wondered off at one point. I expected a more dramatic ending. Snake goes into a murderous rage and kills everyone? ~ 20:35, June 15, 2010 (UTC) Yeah, but he's in a cage. How's he going to do that?User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:20, June 16, 2010 (UTC) Pligga nease. It's a snake. I wanted to add an element of dis-belief with the snake being able to type, but I think that's a bit much. --Sadistic Wolf 14:28, June 17, 2010 (UTC) Against. I guess it's not bad, but a random page satirizing nothing in particular really isn't feature material. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:13, June 20, 2010 (UTC) It's satirizing something, I think, but the thing in general that it satirizes is subtle and unexpected. Namely, the human ego. "I want more articles about snakes", says the snake, just like people who identify themselves as conservatives or liberals or atheist, or christian or well anything want more articles related to how they identify themselves. The snake is a parody of that nature. The snake wants articles about snakes because he's a snake. Notice he doesn't say anything about racketball or something unrelated. The humor would be lost then. He's built this big tower of a false identity, and mighty uncyclopedia brings him down to size. Delicious, really. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:54, June 20, 2010 (UTC) Actually, the beauty of the structure here is that it can be interpreted in anyway; it's rather profligate in the vital areas. Whilst most articles have a clear-cut message, this one relates to abstract poetry in the way that you can use it to represent a multitude of today's social, economical and indeed hypothetical and metaphorical problems. --Sadistic Wolf 19:18, June 21, 2010 (UTC) Against. Not feeling this one as a whole. The start was superb, but goes downhill after that. ChiefjusticeDS 17:52, June 27, 2010 (UTC) Which part? Tell me, and I'll try to improve on it. I'm taking all the criticism I can at the moment. --Sadistic Wolf 20:09, June 27, 2010 (UTC) Against*. Umm. I'm with Chief and 'Dillo here - starts well but falls away, partly because it doesn't go anywhere much after that. And it could do with another pic or two as well. Throw in something interesting to spice it up later on, and you'll be much closer, I'd say. --UU - natter 09:37, Jun 29* Against. I was having fun until this popped up out of no-where: "Old joke, old joke, old joke, ooh - UnPoetia... Nah. Old joke, old joke, vandalised page, old joke..." Yeah. The ending I'm not in love with either... -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 18:18 EST 5 July, 2010 Against. The jokes weren't all that great to me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 20:37, Jul 7 2010
Comments	Comment. Thanks for your votes, guys. Sadistic Wolf 14:27, June 10, 2010 (UTC) You know, I'm seeing a lot of anti-snake hate speech here, and I don't know if I can stand for it. Those of you hatin' on this article are snakeists. Yeah, that's right I said it. I pointed to the elephant in the room. Filthy snake haters. User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:03, July 6, 2010 (UTC) Don't you mean anti-snakeists? Snakeists would be voting for - not against. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 10:13, July 10, 2010 (UTC)