From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnNews:Hungry Hungry Hippos Celebrates Anniversary
|
Score: 13 abominations of nature
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir Starnestommy  (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:23, Mar. 16, 2008
|
For: 14
|
- Nom + For. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:23, Mar. 16, 2008
- Weak f♥r. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:24 Mar 17
- Furries.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- For. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:47, Mar 17
__NOCAJEK__- P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:51, Mar 17- For Cajek gets the mix of random, and funny just right again. MrN
 20:50, Mar 18
- For I might as well, right? Wait... I don't remember being funny in 2008... Le Cejak • <-> Mar 21 (04:42)
- For, now that things have been changed. Good job! --EMC [TALK] 00:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Late For I was about to answer your question Cajek, then I realized it had been improved upon. It flows much better now, and it seems you've addressed most of my concerns. -RAHB 22:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 For. It's better than some other stories we feature Robertodole 18:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)- For...yeah, very good UnNews and all that. /me comes out of Cajek's trance. Wha? Anyway, this is one of the better UnNews' I've seen, definitely, and it deserves featuring. –—Hv (talk) 1/04 14:27
- For. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:27 Apr 02, 2008
- For Meh, for the sake of being for, oh and it's quote funny... - 01:26 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
- LAWL4 Almost as brilliant as me! Jesus Hates You. 23:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
Against Another classic case of an UnNews with good concept, and weak execution. Needs some work. -RAHB 01:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Strong against as per my Pee Review of it. --EMC [TALK] 20:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)- Against per RAHB. --THINKER 05:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Could RAHB and Thinker please be more specific? How close is it to being featured? What do you suggest?? Okay, NOW I remember why this place irritated me so much. Le Cejak • <-> Mar 23 (10:53)
- I'm sticking to on this one. I know you do the random humor thing well, but these jokes are all stuck in a weird state of being tied to the article's subject but strange and to me, not all that funny. I read it twice and just don't feel it. Sorry dude, admittedly I am difícil. --THINKER 23:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:23, Mar. 16, 2008
For. It's better than some other stories we feature 