From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnNews:Government to distribute chocolate chip cookies to Americans in "stimulus package"
|
Score: 9 delicious economy stimulus packages
|
| Nominated by:
|
~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:04 Mar 19
|
For: 14
|
- N♥m && f♥r. Voting against this article means you are against cookies. That means I won't make any for you at the upcoming staff party next week. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:04 Mar 19
- For Its getting harder to put food on your family. For that reason I support this article. --Dr. Beta 01:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Self For, Yeah, I reckon I wrote this article. --THE 21:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's nice and all. But I'm more of an oatmeal raisin gal, myself. --Vana 23:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- *munch*Support. Teh Rote 00:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- For - Oh, here comes my servant now with chocolate chip cookie dough, he must have forgotten how to bake cookies. Oh, its for my nice massage. :-) --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 21:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:09, Mar. 23, 2008
- wFor. Weak because I'd find it much funnier if everyone quoted felt that the cookie idea was the smartest, most perfect thing to do for the economy. The quotes from the "realistic-sounding" people break the mood a little bit. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:15, Mar 23
- I want a cookie! Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 21:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- For --OptyC Sucks! CUN 18:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- C is for cookie. Taco Wiz 20:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- And cookie starts with C--Moonzeppelin MUN 22:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Cookies. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I smiled. Also, the 3rd paragraph was very, very good.Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 14:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against Per Arotenbe. It's much too "here's the punchline, laugh at it." -RAHB 22:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Against sorry pal. --THINKER 05:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Against I liked the concept, but something just didn't tick. --Knucmo2 15:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against Look the article sings the lyrics of sweet chocolate things cookies. Yet I like my cookies to be more of a heartenly nature. Salt, Fat and Acid are the ingredients I like best. Can we have maybe something like equal time in the article? After all, Wikipedia also strives for a balanced presentation of subjects rife from controverse. -- di Mario 15:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against I'm sorry, but I just don't see it. --The Improver talk • contribs • 06:38, Apr 24 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- /* Comment */ Some of the quotes make the joke too obvious and "in your face". Can we make it a little more, you know, subtle? « Arotenbe « aka arotenbe, AaronR, etc. « Now what did I do? « 03:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 On the fence on this one. The concept is brilliant but the execution is lacking. It's not bad, which is why I'm not voting against, but it feels like it could be so much better. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:49 Mar 29, 2008- Abs. Per Skullthumper. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:26, Mar 30
- Abst Per those above especially Skullthumper. I generally like THE articles but this one just didn't tick as well as others. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     08:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
On the fence on this one. The concept is brilliant but the execution is lacking. It's not bad, which is why I'm not voting against, but it feels like it could be so much better. 
