From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Symphony in Z Minor
|
Score: 7 whores, spermatozoa, penises, trips to the future
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:18, 28 November 2010
|
For: 12
|
 Nom+For. Someone gave this a score of 42 in a Pee Review, so it must have some redeeming value. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:18, 28 November 2010- For based entirely on the Socky's recommendation
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 01:22, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A mistresspiece. Funnybony
   08:59, Nov 28 08:59, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Flour You had me at "Fucking Aliens". Read this yesterday, but had to praise Socky (below) before voting for it. Historical pieces are opium to my poppy farmers. Aleister 10:27 28 11
- For. Though I think the whole jizz/cock thing is a bit overdone, it's still a good article. Also, I feel my pee review would have been much less manic than Socky's, had I actually done it like I said that I would back when. Yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:25, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Mrowa 21:41, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It seems like most of the featured articles are psychotic rants of some kind. Not that that's bad.... ,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 00:51, December 7, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Shabidoo 02:46, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Having read it again I've decided I love it. --Black Flamingo 19:35, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. M&M (christmas mood)
 11:30, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
- ' Fucking For'--If you're 555 then I'm
 Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 23:35, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I'm not quite sure why, but I really like this. Successful silliness. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 23:53, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against. Like all articles written from the idiot narrator viewpoint, just seems an excuse to throw in unfunny crudity and random in my opinion.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:45, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- against --121.219.39.246 22:52, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, okay, I admit... I read it. Unfortunately, some ranty things work, and some really don't - to me, this is just too much random and... well, what Romartus said. Unfunny crudity and random. Could have at least been funny crudity and/or random. 1234 ~
 03:40, 16 December 2010
- Against. I gave it my full attention, but it just didn't work for me. Seemed to try too hard to be off-the-wall, and ended up falling flat on its face as a result. --UU - natter
 14:44, Dec 20
 Against.--58.164.117.64 08:12, December 28, 2010 (UTC)- Against. Definitely no. I just don't get it Scofield 08:22, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. Having read that review, I now have no desire to read the actual article... so, er... ~  *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 01:24 (UTC)
- MUHAHAHA! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:36, 28 November 2010
- I'm, er... not sure that's a good thing, Socky... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 01:42 (UTC)
- MUHAHAHA! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:36, 28 November 2010
- You should at least read it before you abstain. --Black Flamingo 15:29, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh? What else would I do, admit that I actually did read it so I could check Socky's review? Never. I'm abstaining. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 15:32 (UTC)
- Not a problem mate, I'm thinking of doing the same actually. Although I'll probably have to read it first. --Black Flamingo 15:39, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Pluckin' feature the pee review and you'll have a one day wonder. I'd do it myself if I was here, which I'm not right now and if I were it would only be for a few minutes. The pee review makes me want to read the article someday. I've only known for a month or so that Socky is a madman, so I've been enjoying that discovery, and I'd nom that discovery and vote For. if I were here. Aleister 2:07 28 11
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:18, 28 November 2010
Nom+For. Someone gave this a score of 42 in a 
Against.--
Abstain. Having read that review, I now have no desire to read the actual article... so, er... 
