Uncyclopedia:VFH/Star Trek Online

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Star Trek Online (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Star Trek Online	Score: 15.5 Chants of “OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! AAAAA!!!”
Nominated by:	Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For: 16.5	Nom and For This is good stuff Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. Ha, nice! Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. Lol. What n00bs. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:33, Feb 3 For. Gads, I hope this vote doesn't make me a latent trekkie.--    20:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. In a galaxy far far... oh no right, that's the wrong Star =) kit 20:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)  For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC) For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC) For. IronLung 17:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC) For. just cos 89.243.212.30 00:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC) For. Woot! Go Kit! First nomination and soon to be feature! Vote for this fine newbie at NOTM. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC) For --Mnb'z 16:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Cute. —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC) For. I am geeky enough to get this. Oh dear. --UU - natter 11:22, Feb 10 For One to beam up, n00bie. --TPLN 23:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC) For. Just 'cos Asahatter (annoy) 21:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC) For. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC) For. I finally finished reading this and I loved it. I may or may not have some Star Trek paraphernelia hidden under my bed. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:56, 25 Feb
Against: 1	Against. I really don't understand what the big deal is. The article looks sloppy, and aside from railing Trekkies there really isn't much here. --Guildensternenstein 13:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC) The whole point of Uncyclopedia is to make fun of stuff in a more or less subtle and originial way, which is exactly what I think the article does. Im sad you didnt agree but respect your opinion =) Cheers.--kit 15:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	abstain. too much went over my head to merit a for vote. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Can't argue with that. If ya havent seen even a single episode (you havent missed too much) it'll be hard to get ;) --kit 20:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain, per Gerry. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article ✔

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.

Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.