Uncyclopedia:VFH/People Who Like to Fuck Naked (2nd nomination)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

People Who Like to Fuck Naked (history, logs)

Article: People Who Like to Fuck Naked

Score: -3 brown envelopes opened

Nominated by: Aleister in Chains
For: 3
  1. Symbol for vote.svg Nom & Symbol for vote.svg For. An entirely new intro since last time to satisfy front-page sensibilities, a pic that once-upon-a-time caused concern was long ago replaced with a googly-eyes funny one, and other edits have made this page camera ready. And the naked pic is not porno, but obviously a sad and forlorn man being comforted by a therapist (self-portrait of yours truly) Aleister 12:44 18 8
  2. For. Despite the 4chan V for Vendetta mask at the end I like this article. Dr. Fenwick 20:00, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote.svg For. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 23:31, 18 August 2010
Against: 6
  1. Against. Interesting conceit with a few good jokes here and there (loved the Marines reference) but rambles on too much without any laughter. Also, it's pretty god-forsakenly ugly. Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 23:47, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Against. I liked the new intro but as per my comments on my page, the fundamental problem with the article remains there still. Sorry Al. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:35, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Against. While I have to admit I like the introduction, it just seems to deteriorate after that. Too ugly for a feature in my book. ~ Pointy.png Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100819 - 16:33 (UTC)
  4. Let's not and say we did. It's not quite good enough to be a feature, and considering how controversial it is, that's a must for me.--HM (T) 19:44, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Against. Better in concept than execution. Needs work, some tidying, and some more obvious jokes - it does come across as quite dry for a significant chunk of it. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:07, Aug 20
  6. Against. Needs to be tidied up, some of the jokes are too drawn out and it never really recaptures the initial spark. ChiefjusticeWii 08:45, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
  1. 4-chan? We shall not let 4-chan have an exclusive to V! That's like letting the right wing in America claim the flag as theirs. And the fundemental problem Romartus refers to is something like it's too unbelievable to imagine a universe where people see fucking naked as a crime, and I commented that it's a spoof on how the media treats sexual information and techniques as something you really can't talk about but have to giggle over and hide. Aleister 12:02 19 8

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH