| Article: Pannts
|
Score: 2 Pannts
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Mattsnow 23:55, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 8
|
- Nom and for. Another good one by the construction company Xamralco. Mattsnow 23:55, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 23 September 2011- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 00:25, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Fory McForfor I understand and I wish to continue.
 . 14:07, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Self-For --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:25, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
- For. User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 01:50, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Sure, why not? --
 Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:44 September 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Really well done!!! Seriously. --ShabiDOO 23:13, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Against. Stretching a thin idea a very long way in my view. Don't see it as a feature.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:17, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Against, sorry. Some great ideas but I'd like to see it expanding... -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- Against. Per Mhaille and Rom Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 16:31, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Per those other three. -RAHB 17:02, October 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Per those other four Funnybony
   20:44, Oct 7 20:44, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
 Against. --EMC [TALK] 04:25 Oct 9 2011
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Mattsnow 23:55, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
For. 
Against. --
21:53, 10 October 2011