Uncyclopedia:VFH/How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid

Article: Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid	Score: -3 Stupid People
Nominated by:	~ N E Z L R 15:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 9	I say this is way too useful for people not to have it on the front page. Plus it's got a bit of humour itself. ~ N E Z L R 15:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Obvious For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC) For Per the It clown.Saberwolf116 17:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC) For. 69.159.62.35 21:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC) For three reasons. 1nd: It's a good, solid page. 2th: It shows that "too many cooks spoil the broth" is not the truism that it purports to be. 3st: We'll never have to see it on VFH again. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC) For what Modus said. Although, it could stand more images. --Mnb'z 03:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 10:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC) For. Eh, what the hell. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:25, 10 Mar For 81.165.231.26 19:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Wonderful! It's humorous. Love it. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 14:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC) ~~#IP vote 206.213.157.4 15:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)~~ - Sockpuppetry--Sycamore (Talk) 15:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC) How do you know that? ~ 16:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Because it told us so: User talk:206.213.157.4--Sycamore (Talk) 16:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Against: 12	Against. - We features pieces of work, not manuals on how to contribute.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Yeah! What Sycamore said! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:32, Mar 9 ... --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 16:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Uhh... It just doesn't seem like it should be featured. It kinda seems a little like featuring the Pee Review.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Wow Really? This is for good material not for guides. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 13:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Nah. ~ 15:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Djdorama 21:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC) No. Really, we're not all that hard-up for features right now. Featuring this would sort of send the message "No one is writing anything, so here's our beginner's guide from 2006". pillow talk 23:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Meh. This is spammed all over every talk page. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 03:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Against Its not an article. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Per Hype. --UU - natter 09:52, Mar 12 Against. I have no problem with featuring one of our guides, but... Na. Mr N 12:04, Mar 12
Comments	It's chronarion's work :P ~ N E Z L R 16:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC) To be honest, I'd say HTBFANJS could compete with some of our featured articles. It's funny enough as far as I'm concerned. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC) It could also give new users the impression that we're so far short on featured articles that we've resorted to featuring our own guides. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 19:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC) But they'd be stupid to think so, since it isn't true. Also, I think they'd rather think it's a joke than a desperate attempt at finding something to feature. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Well I think differently. Not only out of boxes; but out of various other shapes, such as the circle. And the pentadecagon. I also think that you ought to listen to Don't Change by INXS. In essence, my plastic friend, the defining factors of ignorable policy articles give me impression that they primarily there to help new users. They're guides. It certainly convenient that they conform with the theme of this shitty-ASS humour site, and at least be funny well pointing out incredibly important advice, but it's more a good impression if the featured articles on the site are inspired by the information from a mere non-featured article. Plus, the HTBFANJS guide just so happens to be the most linked link. It don't need no god-damned feature status just to show what's what, and who's who, to the noobs who just wander into this mighty kingdom like they're king of the jungle! Peace and love, my man. Blue ranger, out. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Blue ranger? As in power rangers? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Mar 10 No. As in the Lone Ranger when his loneness lead to loneliness ("Oh, Tonto. I don't think that I can go on.") Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC) HTBSANJF anyone? 206.213.157.4 15:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC) No, Nezlr, don't. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:46, Mar 12 Also, if MC Hammer is reading this, please don't hurt 'em. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)