From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Be An Honest Crook
|
Score: 12 criminals coming clean
|
| Nominated by:
|
LongLiverh3 16:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- Nom and for. Possesses a heartfelt and thoughtful touch that I want to see more of on Uncyclopedia. --LongLiverh3 16:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 Yeah ~Formerly Annoying Crap 16:58, 9 May 2009- Yup. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN17:34, 9 May
- For. I Pee Reviewed this one for Jonbob, and liked it. A good concept well executed. T. (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dishonesty is the second best policy. JackOfSpades (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Honest For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 01:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes Though I'm not a fan of that blood spatter image, I really like the rest so yeah. ~Orian57~
 ~Talk~  04:07 10 May 2009
 Bless. so much. User:Zheliel/sigz2 11:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)- For. Sexy Chick
 Zeitgeist 13:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- For per Docile Hippopotamus.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. A well thought out and informative manual; absolutely loved it ImNotASunbeam 07:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dame
  10:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Weak For, because like DJ, 2nd person narrative has got to be good or it's just not. But I liked it a little more than he did. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:12, May 11
- Go for it! Is it okay to vote for your own article? User:Jonbob0008 7:58, 14 May 2009
- For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:58, 15 May 2009
|
Against: 4
|
- Meh It's got to be a fucking awesome "2nd person directing" article to make me vote. This wasn't quite there. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     06:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. per above. Mnb'z 16:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- against. not as per above, but as per not passing the chuckle test. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. For me, this is on the way, and a decent idea, but somewhere short of the finished product. I like the idea, but the execution feels lacking at present. --UU - natter
 11:59, May 12
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. I hovered between yes and abstain.Chose the latter for reasons that the article is in the right place but I don't think it is VFH,--Romartus 22:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)- As always my vote is opinion but 2nd person narrative articles are quickly becoming like Chuck Norris facts to me. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- i believe 2nd person narrative is nearly required for articles in the HowTo namespace. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have to agree. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:23, 21 May
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Yeah ~
Bless. so much. 
Abstain. I hovered between yes and abstain.Chose the latter for reasons that the article is in the right place but I don't think it is VFH,--