Uncyclopedia:VFH/Atlas Shrugged (2nd nomination)

Article: Atlas Shrugged	Score: 9.5 mentions of John Galt
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
For: 11.5	Nom & For. Clemens fixed this up a bit; I now think it's feature worthy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC) ~~It's not. It has rptqts.75.18.174.159 03:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)~~ You can't invalidate a nom without being an admin. In fact, I don't think I can even do this. Staircase CUN^t 03:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Stop being a jerk, IP, or you'll get banned (Hint: you're already banned. Moo ha-ha!). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Objective For. It's definitely good enough now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC) For. I hope people remember I nommed this before it was cool! Le Cejak • <6:41 Jun 15, 2009> For. I do not usually think it appropriate to vote for your own stuff, but I believe that a satirical and reasonably balanced article on the subject is important. Thanks to Cajek, for his brilliant foresight! Thanks to Guildensternenstein for his invaluable advice and help. Thanks to all of you for giving this another chance. --Clemens177 07:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC) CLEARLY IF YOU WERE TO BE HIT BY A TRAIN, YOU WOULD DESERVE TO DIE, BECAUSE YOU ARE A GODDAMN COMMUNIST. EVERYONE ON THAT TRAIN DESERVED TO DIE. THERE WAS NOT ONE AMONGST THEM WHO WAS SO CAPITALIST THAT THEY COULD DESIGN A CLOAKING RAY THAT WOULD CLOAK A VALLEY. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL STOP THE WORLD. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL FIND THE TIME TO FIND THE PARTS OF A MAN HACKED APART SO I COULD SEW THEM TOGETHER at random. THAT'S RIGHT, I'M TALKING TO YOU, ELLSWORTH MONKTON TOOHEY. Inebriated 06:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC) For. per above. Mn-z 15:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC) For. Its OK. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC) For. Much better! ^Dame 16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC) For. I farted... er I mean.... I LIKE IT! -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) For. 24.108.253.110 07:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC) For. communism's for commies! Wurstnachtmare 21:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC) For, if I get a template! —Flutter Tuwoolookie! \| My History \| Brute! 04:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against. I hate repeated quotations from the same source.75.18.174.159 03:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Striking vote based on bannination. Did I do something wrong? Tell my creator! IronLung 04:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC) You know what? We should unban this guy. I think it's funny with his stupid reasons for voting against and crap. Staircase CUN^t 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC) I agree with Steps. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 16:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Don't find it funny. --Docile hippopotamus 10:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Genuine against vote. –Flashfreez 06:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Against. This feels too much like an excuse to talk about Atlas Shrugged, rather than write a funny article about it. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments	This is too long for me to read! Gah! Staircase CUN^t 06:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Leave the striking of the votes to members of the cabal. Thanks. ~ 07:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC) M'bad. IronLung 02:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Abstain. a reluctant abstain but not sure if the semi-conversational style works . Also it talks about the book and then splits off to mention the writer - and then back again to the book. It is an ambitious attempt on a difficult subject matter but I wonder if it would helped to be more general reader friendly. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 22:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC) If you have to explain the joke... The explanation at the ends of these sister articles bug me more and more every time I read them. Get rid of them and I'll gladly vote For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:07, 16 Jun Comment. It looks like this article is still being worked on by the original author. Over 4 kilobytes of material has been added since the nomination. Mn-z 18:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Objectively, I hope. There's nothing I despise more than seeing edits that aren't Rational. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC) abstain. very long, and i got bogged down, and i'm not really familiar with any of this stuff. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Abstain.*. I voted against on the first nomination, and while it's a little better, it's still not a for. Don* Puttano cHeDDs 02:36,20June,2009 02:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC) I'll go with an abstain, 'cause I've never read the book, and you kind of need to know what the book is about to get it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:47, Jun 20