From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: AIDS (Space Program)
|
Score: -3 epidemics of extraterrestrial discovery
|
| Nominated by:
|
IronLung 21:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 5
|
 For. This failed in the past, then Gerrycheevers rewrote it. IronLung 21:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC) For. Another excellent rewrite. --Dame   22:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)For. The AIDS astronaut was positive that they'd reach the moon within six months. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Well, fine. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)- Ok—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 01:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes! —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)- I'm building a bridge to the Mars!
 |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill  | 05:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 13:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Good rewrite. =) Saberwolf116 14:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Bless. testing my new template.. Yay! It worked!  18:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)- For featuring before Gerry is done. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 8
|
- self against. i can't say this is finished enough for me to want to see it on the front page yet, either. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I came here to vote for, but if the author wants more time to work on it, obviously we should give it to him.
 pillow talk 06:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Perfunctory Against based on authorial preference. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 07:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Against for now, as per Gerry's wishes. --Dame 09:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, if you want more time, be my guest. Saberwolf116 12:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Darn it, Gerry! Get moving! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:29, Apr 27
- Fine. I'll vote against. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I checked the history and saw that it hadn't been worked on for a week, it looked good... shit. I'll ask next time. IronLung 01:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. I can see it is a far better replacement for the vile rubbish that was there earlier but can't vote for or against it. Perhaps I am a mite sensitive with issues like this that always teeter on borderline issues like this one. --Romartus 10:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. This failed in the past, then Gerrycheevers rewrote it. 
Bless. testing my new template.. Yay! It worked! 
Abstain. I can see it is a far better replacement for the vile rubbish that was there earlier but can't vote for or against it. Perhaps I am a mite sensitive with issues like this that always teeter on borderline issues like this one. --