Forum:Vote for Pictures is low in nominations.

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote for Pictures is low in nominations.

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4635 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

In the good old days I've seen a ton of nominations. Now, it's pretty much a ghost town. Perhaps we should do something about that. I'm all ears on any solution, as long as it doesn't involve shutting it down because that's not a good solution at all.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:25, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Make more images. Recruit some photoshoppers to the site. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:15, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Nominate some of these. -- The Zombiebaron 17:12, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

HAI I MAEK PIKSHURS  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 15:21 (UTC)

VFP, you say?

UN:N

(Kidding. Please don't ban me. Also, if you can read this, you have excellent eye sight.)

-- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 18:38, Feb. 19, 2012

And your opinion matters because?????????? Oh wait it doesn't.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:23, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

VfP low votes is serious

This is as serious as the VfH low vote problem. Not enough people are voting for VfP. We need something that is similar to VfH is low on scores template. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 04:15, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

No, we don't, and no, it isn't as serious. Uncyclopedia requires featured articles on a regular schedule; featured pictures are displayed at random. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:18 Feb 25, 2012

This is kinda shitty. I really wouldnt mind more regularity for image featuring to brew some accountability. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:05, February 25, 2012 (UTC)