Forum:This site is fuckign FUCKIGN shit

Forums: Index > Village Dump > This site is fuckign FUCKIGN shit

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4950 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

So basically, I first stumbled on this site in 2005 and I started making more regular edits under a username in 2007 or so. I like to call myself part of the CORE FANS of this website.

UNTIL JUST NOW.

I was clicking on "random page" to see if I could wank off faster than I could stumble on an article with a 'Z' in it's title, and I eventually came across (I actually came after this, btw) THIS VERY ARTICLE.

What's wrong with it? It is INCREDIBLY RACIST.

It's unbelievable! IT IS VERY VERY MEAN TO BLACK PEOPLE. I saw racism killed off with the 1970s and thought "THANK FUCK" that that era of bigotism had gone, but..............

... I... just don't recognise this site anymore... Just... not anymore......................... --nachlader 03:40, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't that featured in 2005? You know, the year you stumbled on this site... Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:43, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

FUCK YOU RACIST! I agree with the gay! Uncyclopedia is the wurst! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:46, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

We should ban e|m|c, then let everyone do ONE last thing on the site, then unban e|m|c and then shut down Uncyclopedia 4EVER.--nachlader 03:54, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

 For. --EMC ^[TALK] 10:38 Jul 25 2010

I know, lets ban ALL the articles that are mean to any group of people, or the slightest bit racist or sexist. Let's ban the writer of Girls as a sexist, and the writers of various articles on Asian countries which are all racist too. Let's make all of Uncyclopedia politically correct! I bet we could delete 99% of the content of Uncyclopedia if we tried! -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:59, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

"Politically correct" implies that political correctness is done solely to gain an advantage in political image. Call it "socioeconomicgeopoliticoracialgendersenioritypsychophysicaleducationallevel neutrality" instead. Much more socioeconomicgeopoliticoracialgendersenioritypsychophysicaleducationallevellally neutral of a term. Sir MacMania GUN—[04:10 24 Jul 2010]

Good idea, let's give this nice long term an acronym: we'll call it SEGPRGSPPEL neutrality. Nothing's ever official without an acronym. :) -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:12, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Politically correct? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

There are bad words too!

like in this story.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  24 Jul 2010 ~ 05:32 (UTC)

Um, hi. This is your Aunt Paizure, aaaand...yeah, I really don't see the need for all the gosh darn cussing on this website. As a Christian (Go Jesus!), I find it highly offensive and instead of simply leaving the website I came here to complain about it in a forum. This is where you file complaints, right? (PS, hello <insert name here>!! It's been so long, you're sooo grown up and handsome now!) --Aunt Paizure 06:25, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

BRING OUT THE Fucking CENSORS! Let's just censor every four letter word or phrase that offends us. Or might offend any other innocent group. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 10:32, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hi auntie P!!! I got your prescription from the drug store! I'll bring it over after church.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  28 Jul 2010 ~ 09:04 (UTC)

Is this a real complaint, or another joke post?

Really? Offensive writing is a feature of Uncyclopedia, not a bug. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 19:17, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

i'm very disappointed in you --nachlader 19:30, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Cited in User:SPIKE#Recommended articles by other people. I've been watching over it--by this and my obvious previous username--for a year now. Spıke ¬ 01:42 30-Jul-10

Let me sort this out

This was featured in 2005, way before we became stricter with racism ( might as well also include vanity). And don't think just because there is one article that has been featured that would offend someone doesnt mean we're shit. If you go to ED, thats were the real shit is. But to make a long story short, don't over react over something that you might find offensive. Hope this was helpful--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 19:22, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

ED is however, deliberately racist and offensive. uncyc is just full of really lame humor and severly twisted facts.

it least it's better than illogicipedia.

For the real lulz, conservapedia is the real winner.

for example user Conservative (Ken DeMyer) has become obsessed with thinking that athiests lack "machismo" using only a bunch of shitty clown images from Flickr to prove his point. shit forgot to add the sig. here we go... Lachybus The talking page is here 12:39, July 30, 2010 (UTC)