User talk:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness/Archive1

Look at me, I've done a review! Ain't I helpful? I DEMAND THE STATUS OF SUPREME OVERLORD! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:18, Oct 15

God dammit people. Everytime I want to help on Uncyclopedia, I have to join some bullshit organization. I believe a group dedicated to the Pee Review already exists. It's called the Reviewing Committee. Stop making everything so goddamn messy with your cliques and fancy-shmancy groups. --EMC ^[TALK] 13:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Gruntsquirt Finnius sir. I have dispatched two of the filthy horde, but they just keep coming, sir! Look sir (takes out tear-stained picture of attractive female) that's my girl, sir. She would like to see me again, sir. She thinks the war is hopeless, sir. I had to shoot her, sir...goddamn commie (spits)...now all i got is a cold corpse to go home to, sir. The war ain't right, just ain't right. No disrespect, sir, but all i get out of this deal is shitty rations and bug-bites. But i do it for the cause, sir. Because it's right and just, and America does not flinch in the cause of freedom. Good day, sir. (marches off proudly...the stupid sap)--Finnius 00:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I happen to be on the Reviewing Committee as well. XD

I actually mentioned the Review Committee on the forum post that I used to announce the official creation of the society. My problem with the Review Committee is that it's simply not active. There are users signed up there that I have never seen before and that added their names in January. In this group, there is a minimum reqirement for the number of Pee Reviews that have to be performed per week to stay on as a member. If that minimum is not met in multiple instances the user is ejected. This guarantees that all users on here must stay active. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Announcements

• Our name has been decided! Thanks to all who voted, we are officially People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness! The next order of business is deciding ranks, so get moving! Once ranks have been determined, I can make you all initiates, archive this page to make our real homepage, and get this group moving.
• Pee Reviewer of the Month has been set up! I have set up the page, award template, and userpage template for nominees (by stealing code and examples from a crapload of pages). Nominations can now officially begin on November 1. However, I have also set up one major requirement. You are not eligible for the award unless you have given at least 8 Pee Reviews in the last month, so if you want to be eligible for the award you better get reviewing. All 8 reviews must have been submitted by November 1 for you to be eligible. In other news, I have also created a userbox for us to use. Just put {{Template:User PEEING}} on your userpage.

This user is constantly PEEING. They apologize for the mess.

• Well, because apparently nobody cares anymore, rank voting is over For now. All members are now Fresh Stains!, and I shall hereby be known as Captain Catheter!. Congratulations Freshies, and welcome! Further templates/invites/thank you's/announcements will be done this weekend, probably on Sunday. Good day. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• Yea, announcement after a many-week break. Now that OEJ has earned the first Steel Kidney and Cajek is well on his way to getting the second, I think some of you Fresh Stains need a promotion. I mean, really, it's almost been two months. How fresh could you still be? You're actually kinda starting to smell. Quite badly, actually, and I'm running out of Lysol. I'm considering hiring a- oh yea. Promotions. Anyway, you guys need a name to call yourselves. So... if you happen to be watching this page (for God-knows-what reason) I'll accept name suggestions and nominations for promotion at the talk page. I'm putting up a few deserving users myself, but I haven't been watching Pee Review very carefully so I'm very likely to miss somebody.
• Well, I've closed the vote and I'm pleased to announce that Cajek, OEJ, and Under User are all now Attending Urologists! Any users that continually create good reviews after this will now be promoted from being a lowly fresh stain to being a slighty-less-lowly Attendant! Also, as a message to MrN9000, I'll promote you in about a week. Though you've been giving good reviews for a while, you've only been part of PEEING for a few days so I'm waiting a while so I can keep precedent (for anybody confused, I'm not explaining). Anyway, congrats to all! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomer (talk • contribs)
• WE ARE RE-WRITING THE PEE REVIEW GUIDE

Please read it.

If you are not an experienced piss artist, please refrain from messing too much with the guide without checking with one of the guys who have been working on it (Cajek and MrN9000) or at least reading the talk page...

If you have anything to say about the guide, the best place is probably on the talk page, rather than in the DUMP post, but it's up to you.

A bit of work to be done

First and foremost, I'm going to talk to some of the admins about implementing an official Reviewer of the Month and this Review Week. Let me know on this talk page if you have any ideas/suggestions I should forward to them. Danke. --EMC ^[TALK] 13:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, I do intend to eventually start bugging the admins to make them make Pee Reviewer of the Month official. I mean, if something as small as narration gets Article Narrator of the Month and the Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation, Pee Reviews should definately be awarded. They're formed by more people, used by almost every active user on Uncyclopedia, and they're actually important for the upkeep of Uncyclopedia. I was just waiting for the award to gain more momentum before requesting making it official. However, I do not think that there should be a review week. For one thing, all articles up to this month have now been reviewed, which was the main issue when the topic was brought up in the first place. I also stand by the primary argument that was used against Review Week. If a review week is made, the number of crappy, unhelpful reviews will multiply out of control. The whole reason I founded this group was to combat the need for a Review week. From the time of this writing, we are up to 14 members, all of whom are working to improve Pee Reviews. I think the need has been met, and I hope that a Review Week never has to occur. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps this group should be linked to somewhere in the main Pee Review? --EMC ^[TALK] 02:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Good idea. I'm gonna ask an admin first, though. I don't want to be stabbed with a banstick for changing an official area of Uncyclopedia. Any ideas which one would be kind enough to grant my request but established enough that Famine won't just say screw it and hunt me down? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah screw those jerks. I'll do it myself. If any shit comes down, it'll be on me. But it won't, so we have nothing to worry about. --EMC ^[TALK] 02:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

So I felt the most appropriate place to put us was here. --EMC ^[TALK] 03:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

This page is messy. Somebody should like, remove a bunch of voting crap. --EMC ^[TALK] 13:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Lemme guess who "somebody" would be... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I was right! "Somebody" was emc! I wasn't being a self-centered bastard! Really! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Please believe meeeeee.

Hah. Well it is your project thingy. I have a tendency to get involved, stage a revolution, then usurp power. Like in the last Pee Review. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Nominations for the new yet-to-be-named rank

• Cajek
• One-eyed Jack
• Under user
• MrN9000 (Grr... looks like I just missed out on the Attending Urologist trick...) MrN 22:59, Dec 9

Names for the new yet-to-be-named rank

shit, i go away for 2 weeks and come back to anarchy. Damn, i'll never get reviewer of the month...hehe. Umm suggestions, suggestions. 'The Unwashed Masses' - 'Yellow Eyes' - 'River-runners' - 'Yellow Snow' - 'Urine Specimens' - 'Attending Urologist' ...mix and match as you please... 05:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Yellow Snow -RAHB 06:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Support yellow snow. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 11:40, Dec 4

Attending Urologist - -- fervent Ape (toast) (Riot Porn) 22:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Support Urologist -   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 01:56)

Support MrN 02:35, Dec 9

Commander Catheter A rank below captain, if this was a ship.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 02:18)

Support Commander -   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 02:18)

Support Attending Urologist...also, I'm glad a couple of my suggestions were considered worthy

Well, with a vote of 4:2:1 for Attending Urologist, the vote is now closed. Cajek, OEJ, and Under User are now all Attendants in PEEING. Congrats! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

How about a "PANTS" vito?

For members of this exclusive club? Those given "PANTS" privileges are able to "Shit On" articles which have been put into pee-review without the author actually bothering to do a decent amount of work on it first. This might deter people from using Pee-Review as a naughty way of getting attention to their work without doing the necessary first. Just an idea, feel free to wipe up as required... MrN (03:23, Dec 5 2007)

Shitting on people? Should we call it the 2g1c squad? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:28, Dec 5

How are you supposed to inappropriately defecate on articles when you have pants on? That would just cause you to soil yourself! Plus, I haven't noticed (haha, like I would know) any people submitting any articles in bad faith. Even the IP-submitted articles that I've seen show signs of effort and ask for any helpful feedback that they can get. However, if you do see a crappy article submitted to Pee feel free to enjoy yourself in the review. I seem to recall one submission that had no less than five reviews on it, all from different people. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahh, I will endeavor to remove both my pants and bowels in the future as appropriate. Give the review an appropriate amount of defecation relative to that put in I guess... Will try and remember to flush afterwards. MrN (03:47, Dec 5 2007)

Interesting theory... who the hell would put up articles on pee review to whore them? Those people are little shits. Oh wait, I don't count cuz I put lotsa work into 'em. But now that you mention it, I do sometimes see people putting articles up there hoping to get their articles quadrupled in size from one review, I guess.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 04:08)

RE the pants vito, I think this is what I was talking about... Now that we have:

	Whoops! You have been given the Poison Pee Award
	Have you read the Pee Review Guidelines? ________________________________________________ Make sure you tell em why they got it using this message...

PoisonPee, as described in the new PEE REVIEW GUIDE(read it you lazy ass!) to indicates a (particularly) piss poor pee review, I wonder if we should limit the use of PoisonPee to only those of a particular rank with our group. The PoisonPee could have a habbit of pissing people off, so it should really only be used by people who have some idea of what the hell they are doing. We could remove the instructions about using the PoisonPee from the user guide, and only tell people about it when they get invited into our group? Only those of a given rank would be granted Shitting privileges... What do people think? MrN 11:52, Dec 10

I thought the whole point of putting new members on 'probation' was to then guide them during their initial attempts. During the 'probationary period' would be the time to carefully instruct them in the proper procedures of doing good reviews, yes? Having PoisonPee and shitting SHOULDNT be necessary if WE ARE guiding the newbie. Hell, just give them a couple links to some GOOD REVIEWS...so they get the idea of what an ACTUAL GOOD review looks like, and that should put people on the right track in the first place...

In my view finnius, if someone has bothered to find this place, they have probably also bothered to read the PEE REVIEW GUIDE, and so would not be subject to the Pants Vito anyways. I think Shitting is really a way of telling people who have obviously not bothered to read the guide to go read it. I want to limit the people who can shit, cos... Well it's taking the piss aint it. MrN 13:06, Dec 10

• /pops head round door. I haven't looked in this room in a while, did I miss anything? /gazes at new stuff. Oh. Crikey. Plenty. Good stuff too. /applauds good stuff. Right, off I go to do something or other. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 19:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Holy Oath

I propose (As I put it on the main page without asking anyone first he he) that we have a "holy oath" which must be sworn by all members, and prospective members stating their undying love and support of our holy book... Anyone got any idea for what the oath should be? MrN 00:15, Dec 11

“ I so hereby promise that I will: On an at least weekly basis undo my fly, and perform accurate and well directed pissing of the highest order. I promise that I will continue pissing until I have fully emptied my bladder and will not dribble on my pants. I promise not take the piss, or necessarily open my bowels, unless defecation truly justified... ”

Oh

And I did some stuff with ranks and shit on the front page is anyone cares... MrN 00:33, Dec 11

PROBATION TIMES

It has come to recent attention by myself, Cajek, and MrN that things are a bit unclear as to the probationary times for ADVANCEMENT in rank. My suggestion is ONE MONTH. This could be adjusted depending on the quality/commitment of the individual in question shows, but NOTHING LESS than 2 weeks, imho.

Possibly with a slight modification for those who have just assisted in no small way in completely overhauling the pee-review guidelines? Only joking, I don't really mind... MrN 02:32, Dec 11

In a related topic, I also suggest along with advancement, an official ceremony or 'hazing' be instilled. I leave this up to our SUPREME OVERLORD, although the vision of the advancee, running thru a gauntlet of upper-echelon pee-streams, is mightily appealing to me.

Sounds sensible finnius. Do you mean people have to wait two weeks on the probation list before they become fresh stains? All that means is they can have the pee-template don't forget... What about the other ranks? The purpose of the Attending Urologists is that they can award the poison pee, and lower ranks cannot. The reason being that we only want experienced piss artists giving out the poison pee, cos it's a little bit confrontational. That's why the poison pee is not discussed in the Pee Guide. MrN 02:32, Dec 11

Not discussed in there anymore, that is. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Discussed? Hmm. MrN 02:49, Dec 11

Perhaps one of the Attending can ADOPT a 'new request' and oversee his/her attempts, and give the nod after a couple of weeks and advance them after a few weeks/a month. As for advancement to Urologist, i would like to see a 2 MORE weeks to 1 month, for consistancy. I wouldn't want to see someone just do a shitload of stuff 1 week, then they get advanced, then NO more action thereafter. Im not suggesting you in the slightest MrN. I'm thinking overall. As for you, well you have SHOWN US a willingness to go FAR ABOVE what is expected, and seriously, i would vote for you being Urologist at the moment.

I think people have been talking about lowering peoples rank or maybe even bumping them off altogether if they do not do a review within a given time, so that could work... Don't forget the whole point of having a rank system to encourage people to do Pee Reviews... If someone thinks, dam I need to do a Pee Review, or I'm going to get demoted then they are more likely to bother.... MrN 02:57, Dec 11

That too. Yes, unless they had some good reason for being absent. Emergencies, Hospitals, Deaths, etc...Real Life should not be detrimental to your status

Vacations... Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

exactly. And the reason i said '2 weeks to a month' is because SOME people work jobs, and might only be able to contrib on weekends or something. I work, and try to do little things during the week, and on my 2 days off, squirt out as much as possible..lol

I'm not sure what the real world whatever that is has got to do with all this bollocks. If you die, you get bumped I say. You have a week. That's the rule aint it? We start getting notes from teacher and this is piss is going to go right up the wall. If you loose you rank you can always get it back. Just takes one pee a week after all to keep it. If you can't do a pee a week then your not much of a piss artist r ya? MrN 03:48, Dec 11

I think the real world should count, because there are things that can happen that can keep a person from working on the Pee Review. There are things more important than Pee Review, you know. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Damn, how many discussions are going on here at once? I was thinking about retirement. Not for me, for them. If a promotee has to be inactive for any substantial amount of time, they can go into retirement. This way they keep the rank that they worked hard for, but people don't go around thinking they're active. The promotions aren't necessarily because they give a crapload of reviews, they're given for giving consistent, frequent, and high-quality reviews. If they get promoted but don't want to go into retirement, they only have to do one or two good reviews a week. If a user retires and, later, wants to come out of retirement (haha social commentary) they just have to start giving consistent reviews again. This way everybody's happy. The active users still get rewarded for working hard, the users that need a break from Uncyclopedia, for whatever reason, still get to keep the rank that they were awarded for hard work, and the n00bs don't have to stress out when they get promoted about keeping their rank. And I get to keep my rank forever, because when I made the society I specifically made myself exempt from the normal rules. I'm a bastard. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

A discussion that has left the earth's atmosphere and taken us to lala land

How about someone making a template which we can send to people when they have not done a pee for a while and are likely to get bumped off the ranks system? This might get a few more Pee Reviews done? MrN 04:04, Dec 11

Chances are, if they are not doing Pees..they might not be logging on in the first place..and wouldn't see the template..and do we really need 18 templates for PEEING?

What about adopting fresh stains for promotion?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 04:06)

I give up... I'm going to bed... And if you do find out what's going on Cajek, let me know... MrN 04:08, Dec 11

You people already have 2 PEEING only templates. You don't need more yet. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

OK. Sorry guys, I have NO IDEA what your saying here with your objections to having another template.

finnius:

If you look at Cajek's list you will see that most of the people on this list have only done one or two pee-reviews recently. Although I'm sure that your only reason for not doing a Pee for a while would be because you had not logged on, this is simply not the case for most of the lazy asses on Cajek's list. What would be the problem in sending the template anyway even if a user was not active for a while? At least then when users did logged on again, the first thing they would see would be a template reminding them to do a Pee Review. What's the problem in that?

Uncyclopedian:

RE You people already have 2 PEEING only templates. You don't need more yet. . I have no idea who You people is. Please explain so that we can all understand. RE You don't need more yet... who gives a shit how many templates we have? The point is to encourage people to do more quality pee-reviews. Anything which does that is a good idea surely? MrN 13:27, Dec 11

Exhale MrN9000, relax... We (PEEING) do have enough templates. We're trying to encourage people to give good reviews, not scare 'em off from going near Pee Review. We don't need to go too far.

The Pee queue is the shortest I've ever seen it, which is a good thing, and testament to the work people are doing. We can't force people to do so many reviews, particularly if there aren't that many articles to review! I think with the templates, the award, the new guidelines, and several people actively reviewing regularly, Pee Review is the healthiest it's been in, ohhhh, aaaaages. Let's leave it as it is and not go too far. There's such a thing as being over-officious, y'know - let's avoid it, eh? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm breathing better now. Thanks Under_user. Agree about the being over-officious thing, that's not a good idea for sure... I think we are currently talking about having a system, where by if people do not do a review within a given time period they get lowered in rank or possibly removed from membership as described in our guidelines. What would you suggest we do if someone has not done their weekly (or whatever time period) review? Do we not remind them? Or just bump them without telling em?

RE the current pee queues... Yea, great aint it! Have never seen so little piss in the pond! Perhaps all people need is a little motivation... Cajek's list is helping to provide a lot of that motivation, and it's amazing the effect you can have if you tell a few n00bs that doing good Pee-Reviews might help their chances in the n00b of the month... MrN 14:01, Dec 11

Also, if not having enough Pee Reviews is a problem, then I'm sure we can do something about that! Though I'm not sure this particular problem will last that long... MrN 14:02, Dec 11

Honestly, I think we shouldn't worry about people not reviewing for a while - there could be all sorts of reasons, holidays, illness, work... OEJ hasn't done many reviews that I've seen recently, and yet if anyone were to suggest he doesn't merit his standing, I'd laugh at them. Casting the net wider, SBU had some time away almost immediately after getting UotM, but returned to carry on doing good work; Tom Mayfair had a break on account of becoming a father again, which is fair enough; STM was MIA for a while, then came back with a Featured Article... I've done more reviews recently than I expected to because I had periods of calm at work amongst lots of chaos, and with my birthday and a certain over-commercialised holiday coming up, I may not do any over christmas. I'd be annoyed if I returned to be told I wasn't considered a decent Pee Reviewer any more. Again, let's stick with the encouraging, and focus less on the discouraging, or we may find that, as quickly as they haves improved, the standards of Pee may slip again as people get put off contributing. For my money, we leave things as they are, and see how it goes for a while. If standards start to slip, or the queue builds up again, that's the time to discuss further incentives! (Hmm, I seem to be using italics a lot today. That probably signifies something). --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't disagree with any of that. Did you read the current guidelines for membership of PEEING? The one week thing? I'm not sure it's about who's a good reviewer and who is not. I thought that PEEING was really a motivation technique and hopefully one of the things which are (I hope) improving Pee Reviews. Maybe I'm wrong... Perhaps we need to completely re-think the whole membership and ranks thing... MrN 14:51, Dec 11

No, PEEING is working, which is a good thing. I just think we don't need to be too rigid, particularly while things are going well. The guidelines are there, but I think that's all they should be for now - guidelines rather than hard and fast rules. After all, our glorious captain has hardly reviewed his ass off recently! Let's see how things go. UU abides, man, UU abides... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

PEEING is definnately working. I remember when it was just being 'born'. The review queue was backed up like 2 months, and people were grumbling. I think things are fine just the way they are. If people are inactive, they are inactive. Also, SOME of the people on Cajek's list ARE NOT PEE'ERS. THERE IS NO LAW HERE stating you MUST join PEEING to do a review. That being said, there TEND to be people that ENJOY doing reviews (myself included)...and we have joined a 'club'...that is the nut of it. Hell, you don't have to BE A MEMBER to get ROTM. YES, it's true!

/me bursts in the front door I AGREE!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 15:47)

I feel like this whole argument was somehow directed at me. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Well I'm glad I was here... You bastard Boomer! MrN 00:52, Dec 12

Don't get Paranoid, Boss. They are just jealous. (waves away Cajek and MrN9000)...Shoo, guys! Get back to work.

BOOMER YOU BASTARD!. MrN 01:03, Dec 12

Seriously. I'm happy to not change another thing about PEEING. I'm just trying to improve Uncyc a little by improving Pee Review. I have no wish to upset anyone, or piss on anyone's bomfires, or various other metaphors... T'is all gud. MrN 01:06, Dec 12

Actually, I thought it was directed at me because I don't do anything. I'm a lazy ass. It's true, I'm not kidding. I know it might be hard to believe at first, but the hard truth is that all I do is discuss and debate. I'm sorry. I must now ritually kill myself. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Your ceremonial knife, sir. I got you the one with the inlaid diamond in the hilt.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 03:29)

Did you sterilize it? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't do everything you bastard! Jeez! WHY DON'T YOU APPRECIATE ME? I got in this ceremonial gown for one reason: to see you stab yourself, Boomer!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 03:41)

DO YOU WANT ME TO GET AN INFECTION?!? I refuse to kill myself until somebody sterilizes this! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Finnius, knowing full well that urine is sterile, Pees profusely all over the ceremonial knife.

I was wondering if somebody would catch on to that. Anyway, /me, giving a great shout to the heavens, plunges the knife into his stomach. As the world around him slowly fades, he recalls memories that had been buried since his birth. His greeting from Zombiebaron, his five months of utter silence, how he greedily and violently clawed his way into the very bowels of Uncyclopedia, and, finally, his first true accomplishment, the founding of PEEING. Smiling, he slowly closes his eyes and drifts off. As his mouth falls slightly open, a small string of saliva coming off of his sharp, muscular chin, all surrounding him weep. The event is broadcasted, and billions watch in tears as Boomer finally falls. Then he, without any warning, suddenly explodes, giving off enough force to destroy the entire north-western hemisphere. Boomer has passed, but his legacy will live on. Unsolicited conversation' Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

that was, BY FAR, the third most emotionally-charged death I have ever witnessed. /me scoops up Boomer's corpse and heaves it into the garbage bin behind Uncyclopedia and puts Boomer's sig on top of it. Then I say a little prayer in limerick form that is both clever AND rhymes!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 04:31)

My pee made him Asplode! I am all powerful. I get his job now! (digs in Boomsta's pockets for the keys)

Dibs on his I.D.!!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 04:48)

/me pops out in a cloud of pink smoke and rainbow confetti. GIVE ME BACK MY FUCKING CLOTHES!!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Why were you wearing assless chaps underneath your panda bear costume?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 05:19)

Um... well... This is rather uncomfortable... LOOK! A DISTRACTION! /me runs away, nekkid, and falls in the gaping hole left by his death, nekkid, screaming, until he hits the bottom with a comical boinking sound, nekkid, and dies. Nekkid. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh HO, don't mind if I do!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 22:15)

A kick Boomer in the balls template?

Come one, people must think we need one of these? MrN 01:16, Dec 12

/me bursts in the front door I AGREE! THEN LET'S TALK ABOUT HIM BEHIND HIS BACK!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 01:18)

Something tells me that when I see my name on here it's probably not {{USERNAME}}... In any case, MrN9000 and Cajek are going to be on a leave of absence for a while. They're both in the hospital numerous broken bones and fractures. Pray for them. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Why is the Pee Pond so empty now?

What do people think? There is hardly anything left to review! What changed specifically to make it like it is now? I think we can thank Cajek's list more than anything else. The guide new is helping, but it's the list which makes em work I think! Everyone likes a list... Also I told both the N00bs that doing a good pee would help in the N00b of the month... Look how many Garfield and AE have done... Anyone have any other ideas as to why there is so little piss in the pond? Might be worth noting this now so that when it fills up again, we can try to remember what we did this time to empty is so nicely... MrN 02:07, Dec 12

Actually, there are no more articles to pee because Cajek and Finnius went on a month-long killing spree. Blame them for putting you out of a job. Damn immigrants. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

It's been going steadily down since PEEING started. The original backlog was like 2 months. And assuming a couple new ones pop up a day...im sure there were at least 60. Thanks to all that helped in unblocking the toilet.

Could someone do a 2nd review on this?

Hans Blix and the Weapons Inspectors . I created a 2nd template where MY review is. I couldn't figure out how to RELIST it in the 'articles up for review', tho. Or am i just being stupid?

thanx 05:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I think you can just revert it back to before the review was done fin... You need to get it out of the 'reviewed' category, which it gets added to when someone does a review. I think there is some code in the Pee table which automatically adds the category to the page when the scores boxes have been filled out... MrN 14:24, Dec 15

OK, we have toned down the poison pee and come up with the 'chilled out dribble'

	Hey, I don't mean to be a dick but...
	I noticed that you had done a Pee Review of MrN Has unusually large reproductive organs. Thank you. I was wondering if you could let me know why you had given your scores, and also wondered if you had any suggestions for how the article might be improved. Would you please consider giving another review? Thanks!

User:MrN9000/BoxyThings/ChilledOutDribble

And for the more rambling amongst us

	Well Hello! Hope you don't think I'm being a windger but...
	I noticed that you had done a Pee Review of Seriously! They are enormous! . Well thank you. Sorry to be so needy, so nerdy, so focussed on the minor details, but you've given the numbers without the logic behind those numbers. Also, my mum wants to know if you know how to make the page any better, because she really wants us to win the Science Fair this year. Would you please consider giving another review? Thanks!

User:MrN9000/BoxyThings/ChilledOutDribble2

What do people think? It's a controversial one as to how these should be used. There is obviously potential to piss people off here. It has been suggested that we might be able to get away with sending the template when a person does their first Pee Review, really as a way of asking them to read the guidelines. Also the templates could be used at the discretion of the person who got a poor review. It's tricky as we may not know the circumstances which the Pee Review was done under, and we could get criticised if we go around telling people what to do. Any comments or suggestions? MrN 14:24, Dec 15

guys, seriously

It does not need to be this complicated. Just do reviews, at least adaquately. I see no need for multiple templates, inane banter on usertalk pages,and other such nonsense. You all seem to be very enthusiastic about it, and that's all fine and good, but you are starting to take the 'fun' out of it...STOP pissing on my fun !

/me pisses on Finnius. .....That came out wrong. But why did it feel so right? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:55, Dec 16

I was Mr. Grumpy that day. I might still be, still pondering that one

Well, Mr grumpy is GAY. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:58, Dec 17

Damn, I'm gone for a few days and the retard turns gay. I miss all the fun. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Xmas!

~ Merry Xmas Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness/Archive1! ~ Ye Olde Luke

--YeOldeLuke 08:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Wait, what? Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 04:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Xmas is so like yesterday, er, I mean the day before yesterday. MrN 04:59, Dec 27

epic fail   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:05)

It's...

...time for to change over to the FAL standards. Who's with me??

Urologist: How does somebody become...?

How do we promote people from fresh stains to urologists?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 31) 21:48

Doesn't Boomer make the call? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:18, Dec 31

Ya im bak. Who do you want promoted? I like to reserve this power for myself because, naturally, I always make fair judgment (it is me, after all) and these guys have to be reviewing consistently and well. What I did with joo guys was check your last many reviews to make sure that effort was put into them and that you're turning them out at a good rate (unlike somebody that I know). Just give me the name(s) and I'll check him/her/it/them/undetermined out. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 03:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, no, I was just curious. However, I like that method of promotion.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 2) 04:54

Congrats Cajek

Thank you, signature.   Le Cejak • <-> Feb 11 (02:33)

Why?:Do a Pee Review

Why not indeed! MrN 19:52, Jan 10

*cough, cough, cough, hack, hack, wheeze, cough, wheeze* Somebody hand me my inhaler. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thus, another fine example of why Boomer is in charge here.

I kan haz a tlak!

lolwut? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

says quietly, "medication time" and approaches Boomsta, syringe in hand...

Fag for Attending Urologist?

He's been smoking of late, and has shown an interest in updating Cajek's Pee page. What do ya think Boomsta / chaps? Do we need a faggy attendance? MrN 23:09, Feb 5

Sorry, we don't allow smokers. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh shit, I was gonna look at his reviews. Crapcrapcrap. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

He's deserving. Let him in. Go on, he's smiling at you in that alluring way you just can't resist. Aww go on Boomer, let him play! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm having a difficult decision. I'm ready to let him in, but he's had a review for TKF reserved since the 7th. I want to see what he does with it before making my final decision, but if he doesn't even do it I'm not sure how reliable he'll end up being. Captain Can you read that? Feel the love. 22:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Talking of Attending Urologists...

What happened to Fin? Swim back to us Finnius! The toilet is getting all blocked again! MrN 23:18, Feb 10

Heya

I'm back... Somewhat. I hate being busy, but work and school and sleep have prevented me from doing anything in months. I'll try to get in a couple reviews a week. Maybe.

In my absence I thought of articles I could write. I have a list of 30+ ideas, and no time to use them. >=(

On a a side note, Under User, remember those creepy pictures you made ages ago? I reworked the article! If someone could give it a decent review, I can get back to my futile quest of getting a pokemon article featured. I have 3 pokemon articles already planned.

On another side note, I was amazed that no one vandalized this. It is very accessible, but I guess there was nothing offensive to expand on.

So anyways, heya! I will review enough to retain my membership and clean up the mess. My mom has some blue cleaner that picks urine right up!

Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 07:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Great to have you back and reviewing Serq_fet. Hope you can manage a few, everyone knows the pee queue is starting to get really full. Oh, there is a Reviewer of the month award going next month don't forget... I'm actually not too sure who to nominate for that, other than the obvious Fag again... MrN 10:49, Feb 17

I'm taking it upon myself...

Hey guys, thanks for letting me into your little club thing here. Now I'm sure you've all seen Cajek and UU running around, throwing their "Review In Progress" templates all over the place to prevent edit conflicts from happening. I thought to myself "hey, that's a pretty splendid idea! I want one of those!" so I made one. Then I was thinking again about how "hey, us UnNewsAudio kids got us a standard template for people who don't feel like making their own custom ones, why don't those PEEING guys have one?" So, I've decided that I'm going to make one for you guys to prove my usefulness. I'll be back in a few minutes with some ideas, probably going to involve that __NOCAJEK__ thing. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 00:05 Feb 23)

PRIP EXPIRED Though SysRq reserved this Pee Review, he/she/it/Abominable Snowman has not yet completed it. You may claim the review by replacing his/her/its/Abominable Snowman's name with yours.

There's what I got for ya. Yes? No? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 00:14 Feb 23)

I like it, and I think you could get away with putting into mainspace, probably at Template:Prip. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:19, Feb 23

Alright, I'll do that. I'll wait for Boomer to see this before I put 'er up on the PEEING main page as an "official template". EDIT: And yeah, it's just been moved to Template:PRIP. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 00:27 Feb 23)

Here I am! I like the template, although I may never end up using it. You all know why. Anyway, since UnNews has their silly little narration template, this one appears to be just dandy for our uses. I approve and whatnot! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'ma put that guy up on the PEEING main page with a little blurb on its use if no one objects to it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 03:30 Feb 23)

You could also consider sticking in a little blurb about it in UN:PRG. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:17, Feb 23

...In the morning. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 04:33 Feb 23)

Yeah, it's cool, such templates are very handy for preventing conflicts. I'm sticking with my own, however. Because I can. :P – Preceding unsigned comment added by Under user (talk • contribs)

The template has some new features, see the front page for the lowdown. Any comments/criticism? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:28 Mar 3

I'm not sure about needing to put the ~~~~~ can that not be part of the template so that users do not need to type it everytime? ICU does it for example... MrN 00:38, Mar 3

I can go look at how to do that (since I don't rightly know myself) ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:42 Mar 3

Just copy a template which already does it I guess... MrN 00:49, Mar 3

I'm looking at the ICU template which requires 5 tildes. Do you know of any templates that don't? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:58 Mar 3

Woops my bad. ICU is not a good example. Try Template:Construction or Template:WIP. I think that might show a way to do it. MrN 01:09, Mar 3

Oi. I might try my hand at it at some point, but some help would be just dandy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:24 Mar 3

<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>{{#time: H:i, j F Y | {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}}}} Maybe? MrN 02:18, Mar 3

I think that'll work. Thanks a lot. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:30 Mar 3

EDIT: No, it doesn't work. The subst: is still there, and the time keeps updating when it's not supposed to. I'll tinker for a bit until it does work. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:38 Mar 3

OK Boomer

Stop pissing about and make SysRq an attending urologist... This guy deserves it. MrN 01:45, Mar 7

Wait, wouldn't that mean I would have responsibilities? O noes! Then again, it might be nice to update User:Cajek/Pee since someone hasn't bothered to update it and add my last pee. Thanks MrN. I'm honored. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 03:04 Mar 7

/me whistles innocently. I don't know what you mean... Bloody uppity fresh stains. You have a couple of tough days at work, lose a whole bunch of work to two power cuts (true), work like an arse to catch up, try to stay on top of the pee as well, miss one review, and they go thinking you've lost it! ;-) I think it's the first sign of the RotM curse striking myself. Come on curse, is that the best you've got?! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:28, Mar 7

Bugger this, I'm off to nom Boomer for RotM... :-) MrN 12:52, Mar 7

Frlz, UU. Your survival this month determines whether or not I'll feel safe if I win it this month. Keep that chin up, kiddo! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 14:24 Mar 7

Oh, look at the big man! Bossing the Boomer around! I think I'll check out his reviews first, Mr. Stuffyfluff! So there! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, fine, he's in. SysRq, feel free to add some inane comment about your urine after your sig. It seems to be a hobby of the attendants or something, I don't know. They add things under my name too. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, thanks bro. But I'm pretty sure I already have two piss related links in my sig already. Eh, another one couldn't hurt. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:58 Mar 8

Ah, I should have specified. I meant putting them after your sig on the member's page, as you'll notice Finnius has already done. There used to be more, but somewhere along the line it was evidently decided that RotM was a rank promotion and therefore higher than Attending Urologist. Pretentious bastards. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, you SHOULD have specified. =P Naw, I'll get right on that. Thanks again. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:17 Mar 8

...swims into the room, looks around, and notices that there are reviews pending from A MONTH AGO ! A friendly growl emanates from his fishy lips, and he looks for some poor, unsuspecting soul to bite...

Haha. Fishy lips. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 20:28 Mar 9

Hea Fin! Glad to see you back! Some of us have really been slacking of late. Would be great to see you back helping out unblocking the toilet. Where did you go? We thought you must have migrated up stream? MrN 20:51, Mar 9

was on vacation in California and Arizona...i'm back now, and working on the 3 earliest reviews (those from FEB.) I heard that Cajek has sort of disappeared....soooo can i have his ROTM award ?? hheheh (kidding...fish dont need no steenkin' badges)

Cajek still graces us with his presence from time to time... Actually, some of us were starting to think that you two had run off together! MrN 21:29, Mar 9

LOL...no my girlfriend is not the 'sharing' type

Oh yeah, Finnius, I remember you... Heya! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:26, Mar 9

ok, i've done 2 so far from the 'February' list. I want a few of you to work on those pages as well, i sure the hell am NOT going to do all 9 that are still pending. Failure to heed my empty threats will cause me to pee all over your furniture.

I'll get to some of them, let me finish the other one I'm peeing on right now and I'll start working on the old stuff. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:19 Mar 9

hehe...i remember you as well. I see you made 'attending'...well done. Ya, im one of the original ppl that helped start up this PEEING thing...glad to have you aboard and being active.

Thanks, we're all glad you're back to whip us back into shape. We've gotten a little lazy with Pees (I know I have, and I shouldn't be, especially now. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:39 Mar 9

Some of us have been reviewing all year so far, Fin, and I'm faintly proud of having clocked up my landmark 100th review... If it wasn't for a small handful of us, the queue would still stretch back to January! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:08, Mar 10

BLOODY HELL!!! 100 reviews??? Awesome. Just awesome. MrN 09:24, Mar 10

Hoshit. Go UU. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 20:48 Mar 10

Important vote

Please Vote Now MrN 22:35, Mar 11

meh.

The freshest stain this side of the railroad tracks!

Alright joo gize, let's have a warm welcome for our newest and most promising Fresh Stain, Mightydandylion! Now here's a reviewer to keep an eye on. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:43 Mar 19

/me welcomes MDL (I have to say, this guys reviews are incredible so far, let's hope he can keep it up). –—Hv (talk) 19/03 22:51

New Attending Urologists

Mightydandylion (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 users, as well as 1 person who has a say in the matter. ALL HAIL BOOMER!

• For Definitely a good reviewer, nommed in RotM.   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (23:24)
• Fro. One of my favorite noobs, primarily because he's just a damn fine reviewer. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:37 Mar 26
• Abstain For now... Though I'm sure he will make it soon. Don't forget that being Attending basically means that the other members of Peeing have decided that the user in question is experienced enough to be contacting people giving poor reviews, and to ask them to do better. Mightydandylion's just a little bit new to be telling others how they should review IMO... Anyway, it's Boomers call... MrN 23:46, Mar 26
• Yea, I finally looked at his reviews, and I'm glad to say that I am for. Interestingly enough, this is the first Attendant that I've appointed that hasn't insulted me in some way. You should all be ashamed. Mightydandylion, feel free to add some pointless comment about your urine after your sig, as per tradition. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I got one very brilliant review from him one time. It explained everything I needed to do, and I think that page is much, much better than if someone had just typed in the numbers while drunk. I support anything you nominate Dandy for! Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 13:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

1. For Haven't personally been reviewed by him recently (have I?), but he IS nommed in RotM.   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (23:24)

Cajek REALLY needs to CATCH UP with current events. Our good friend SysRq has been attending rather well for some time now... MrN 23:33, Mar 26

Yarr, I was going to say...I'm pretty sure my sig already has AU somewhere in there. And no, I'm not talking about gold for those of you who are chemistry nerds. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:37 Mar 26

But it's such a pretty gold color... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

God dammit, just hurry up! lol   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (23:56)

Wow, somebody's feeling pushy. These things take time. First I must look at how long the user in question has been doing reviews, then I must consult the review table that you so graciously created, then I must look at the reviews in question, then I must meditate with some sake, and then, finally, after waking up and taking some aspirin, then I can finally make my decision. Funny how much I could have done while typing this. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Heerenveen (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

1. Point of order here: if we're putting up MDL for his excellent work (which I have no argument with, by the way), Heerenveen is just as deserving. In about a month he's come from nowhere to overtake MrN in the top 5 - no small achievement. He's also been around Uncyc longer (and had a quality length hiatus, which I think gives a user cachet!) and his reviews are consistently top notch, and I tip him to maker next month's RotM a close battle with MDL. So anyways, for. Boomer, if you want to check all his reviews in the last month, make sure you have a comfy chair and a piping hot drink! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:23, Mar 29
2. FOR I didn't know all this!   Le Cejak • <Mar 29, 2008 [11:37]>
3. Boomer!!! Obviously UU is right. MrN 14:01, Mar 29
4. F♥r. HV vs. MDL for April's RotM? Jeez, I dunno where I stand on that. My vote may come in late for that one, because both of them have really wowed me. But HV is undeniably Attending at least in spirit if not in title. Let's formalize that. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:31 Apr 1

I'm not going to vote at all, unless you bastards force me to. I tend to delay things like that anyway, just like I am with my suspense-filled announcement. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• This will probably end up being for, as I looked at some of his and Javascap's reviews while browsing through the recent reviews looking for Mightydandylion, but right now I'm tired and ready to relax. So, I'm going to use this as a convenient spot to say that I'm not going to make anybody Attending Urologist on my own, even if I've already looked at their reviews. If nobody happens to nominate a certain user, I'll find some way to mention them to somebody that's already an attendant, probably whenever I happen to see MrN, Cajek, or Finnius (if/when he comes back) on IRC, but I won't be nominating any users nor appointing any urologists unless they're nominated first. So there. Boomsta, out. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hurry up and make him an attending already, Boomsta!   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [0:22]>
• Announcement!!!!!! Everybody gather 'round, I have come to a decision! After a few minutes of deliberation, a day-long break, and then a longer, totally-not-purposefully-so-but-still-suspenseful deliberation session, Heerenveen is now our newest Attending Urologist! Part of my hesitation was due to a tendency to be rather overly-critical of bad articles, but from his/her/its/undetermined's most recent review I believe that Heerenveen is completely ready for this promotion. Free free to change your sig as necessary, and add some stupid comment after your sig on the main page. CONGRATULATIONS! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Ah! Okay! I can understand what you're saying, Boomie. We can't make everyone attending just cuz they're nominated. Good for you for thinking about it.   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [1:34]>
    • Is the voting for RotM over yet? What happens now?   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [1:35]>
      • Uh, we celebrate? The admins take care of cleaning up the official voting pages. Also, Boomie? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

CONCEPT FIRST (from main page)

So I saw something interesting, reviewing concept before humor. What's the deal, yo? Is this a mutiny?   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (22:47) it's me again.

Screw that... What the F&*k is going on!!! Boomer is doing reviews? The Pee queue is empty? WTF??? Also. Why are we chatting on the dam main page! Did not some anal user try to stop people doing that? This page will get full of piss! What do people think this place is for? Peeing or something? Also, does MrN really think that typing stuff on the main page, when he himself said it should be on the talk page is actually going to help the situation? Also... What the hell is going on? Boomer is doing reviews, and the Peeing queue is empty??? Also... Boomer is doing reviews??? Perhaps we need to send some kind of medical team round to Boomers place. He's obviously not feeling well... Also Boomer is doing reviews? MrN 22:58, Mar 26

While this might be more suited for the talk page, I'd just like to say what I said over there so that the rest of the PEEING community can hear: I review the table out of order most of the time. You don't HAVE to use the table from top to bottom in one sitting. Cajek is NOT going to come to your house and make you review things his way. That's not what PEEING is about. (Or is it?) I would strongly discourage making your own table in lieu of just filling out the existing one in whatever order you want. BUT THAT'S JUST ME. And yeah, MrN went and edit conflicted me so I didn't change my comment to make up for that. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:13 Mar 26

Maaaaaybe, but no matter what order you fill it out in the categories still end up in the same place. I wanted the concept to appear above the humor, since the part on humor expanded upon the part on concept. You see, it means I can fill two sections with what normally would have used up one section! Shortcut!

Also, MrN, do you notice that Pee Review emptied on the same day that I started reviewing again? I, Boomer, Captain Catheter of the People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness, have emptied Pee Review!!! Really, all I needed was some Drano. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I judge the Images first, follow that with the concept, then judge the humour, and after that, prose... Warm Regards, Javascap

Boomer did a review? Course, I was just about to do one myself. Shame there are none in the queue. Dam... MrN 00:03, Mar 27

The queue empties while I'm on hiatus? I may have to extend my hiatus, if it has that kind of effect! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:46, Mar 27

I was about to say the same thing about my own hiatus. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 20:03 Mar 27

These hiatuses sound fun. Maybe I should go on one for another six months. –—Hv (talk) 27/03 20:10

Hey, don't expect this behavior to keep up. Remember, I am me. I'm just screwing with your heads right now. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)