User:SysRq/IC Main Page

Welcome to the new and improved Imperial Colonization!

Please take a moment to read/tl;dr these rules and guidelines before starting.

Imperial Colonization is a usergroup that chooses a new article each week to improve. It's a sort of mass collab, kind of like Wikipedia's "Collaborations". We focus on articles that require immediate attention, as judged by, well, us. See, our philosophy is that if we spent some time improving the articles that casual readers are most likely to come in contact with or look up (such as Twilight, Barack Obama, or The Jonas Brothers), more readers would stick around, make accounts, and become writers themselves. This is really about revitalizing the wiki, something we feel is a very noble cause.

Or something. Whatever.

Hey, sign up here!

Just add your name below. (#{{u|Username}})

Meet our staff

• SysRq, FAD

The Schedule

Today is Tuesday. We are in the concept and development phase.

This week's Colonization

This week's Colonization is...

Example Colonization!

The current queue

Vote for any and all nominations you plan to participate in. Add as many nominations to the list as you like, within reason.

John McCain

Score: +2

• The article is lackluster, there's lots of potential for many to contribute, and the timing is ripe. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• yep. I think this would be more entertaining to edit, because (probably) most of the editors are pro-Obama. Although Obama could be funny, too...   Le Cejak • <0:55, 08 Jul 2008>

Egypt

Score: +1

• I really don't know what's going on here. It looks a bit like vanitycruft. It was moved to a page with a stupid name in 2005, and I can't find much on here besides recycled jokes. We can do better than this. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Sex

Score: +3

• Really? This is what we have for sex? This is it? This makes me sad ladies and gentlemen. Real sad. And it sure is getting mighty crowded in here. Just sayin'. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• I remember, back in the day, there was this awesome line that started the article. "Sex is something that nobody on Uncyclopedia has ever had. Therefore, it will be described in great detail." I never read the rest of it, but it's not particularly relevant to the situation anyways. – Preceding unsigned comment added by RAHB (talk • contribs)
• Yes Please! MrN 16:25, Aug 17

Cthulhu

Score: +1

• Is this all we have to honor him with? The C-man's not gonna be pleased with us.   Le Cejak • <17:05, 25 Jul 2008>

Bruce Lee

Score: +1

• I just {{ugly}} tagged it, but figured this might be appropriate too. -- The Zombiebaron 07:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Warren Buffett

Score: +1

•  It sucks and must be saved. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 14:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Link (Legend of Zelda)

Score: +2

• for. this needs to get cleaned up and awesome-ified. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
• YES The whole damn Zelda Template could use some work. Ocarina in particular is pretty bad, but that's a different story. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Mario

Score: 1 Fat Japanese-Italians

• The most well-known and best-selling video game characters ever has this shit for an article? Pitiful! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Rupert Murdoch

Score: 1

• Could do with a little love? — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

William Shakespeare

Score: 1

• If this wasn't Shakespeare, I'd put it on VFD. Instead, we should make a new, better version. Concept-wise, I suggest a "Hey kids, isn't Shakespeare cool?" approach. I'm already planning a "To be or not to be" rap. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  10:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Adult Swim

Score: 1

• Considering that this is something I would bet every Uncyclopedian is familiar with, I can't believe they couldn't come up with anything coherent. -Tritefantastic 05:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Israel

Score: 2

• I think this hornet nets of murderous Jews needs a proper article. ~ 13:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Hey Mordillo, is that a rotating penis in your sig? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

  Nevermind, you already reverted RAHB's vandalism. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Mexico

Score: 2

• Speaking of long, cluttered articles about countries... pillow talk 22:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• This is bloody horrible. ~ 22:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)