Uncyclopedia talk:Top 10 Articles of 2008
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Happy top five everybody --
00:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)- Of course I'm happy, I'm in it! Also "gay" used to mean happpy. Or something. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 02:03 2 February 2009
- ...where's the results? I just see (tied) all over the place. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe it's just as they get re-featured. Which is tottally cool I didn't know that was happening. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 03:59 2 February 2009
- You guys don't remember last year? We put them here as we featured them, day by day. It creates a nice countdown effect. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:23, Feb 2
- I wasn't around this time last year. Though it does make sense. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 04:25 2 February 2009
- NOOB! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:45, Feb 2
- Well if you want to be really picky my first edit was on the first of December 2007. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 04:47 2 February 2009
- FORGETFUL! FOORRGEEETTTFFUUUUUULLLLLLLL! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:58, Feb 2
- I didn't forget, I just ignore my embarrassing December edits because I only really started to figure this place out when I came back in March 08. Now stop being so beligerant. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:00 2 February 2009
- Quiet back there, you two! Don't make me turn this page around! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't forget, I just ignore my embarrassing December edits because I only really started to figure this place out when I came back in March 08. Now stop being so beligerant. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:00 2 February 2009
- FORGETFUL! FOORRGEEETTTFFUUUUUULLLLLLLL! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:58, Feb 2
- Well if you want to be really picky my first edit was on the first of December 2007. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 04:47 2 February 2009
- NOOB! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:45, Feb 2
- I wasn't around this time last year. Though it does make sense. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 04:25 2 February 2009
- You guys don't remember last year? We put them here as we featured them, day by day. It creates a nice countdown effect. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:23, Feb 2
- Maybe it's just as they get re-featured. Which is tottally cool I didn't know that was happening. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 03:59 2 February 2009
- ...where's the results? I just see (tied) all over the place. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
not to rain shit on this extravaganza parade, but[edit source]
Usually it's done like this:
- 1.(tied)
- 1.(tied)
- 3.
- 4.(tied)
- 4.(tied)
- 6.
- 7.(tied)
- 7.(tied)
- 7.(tied)
- 7.Why?:Am I a Power Ranger? (tied)
Just be glad I'm the one that warned you. Tennis Mickey was gonna come and baseball bat-rape whoever was responsible for this. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 12:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- So So, you ruined my fun! I even went and got a new bat. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 12:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
No no, usually it looks like this -
14:28, 2 February 2009, Mordillo (Talk | contribs | block) blocked So So (Talk) (expires 14:28, 9 February 2009 (Stop being so bloody petty with the Androgynous whatchacallit) (unblock)
~ 12:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- So when do we get to see the real results and not just (tie) (tie) (tie)? —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, I just fixed that, then read this page. Please don't block me Mr. Mordillo, sir! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:38, 03 Feb 2009
- To clarify: It's not a demotion, that's that actual place it got. If you ignore the numbers of the top 5, and then look at the number for the article that placed sixth highest overall - you've numbered it 4. The 4 articles that all shared the 7th best score are all numbered 5. Trust me, this is how all lists like this are done :) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:27, 03 Feb 2009
- I promise to read it tomorrow, I'm so tired it's all blurry now. Honestly sir! O_O ~ 23:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've even made a picture of an annotated list and everything! In the end, this is the only page the numbers will be shown on, so it doesn't even really matter, but if we can't number our lists right, then we're no better than the Venezuelans! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:46, 03 Feb 2009
- I promise to read it tomorrow, I'm so tired it's all blurry now. Honestly sir! O_O ~ 23:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- To clarify: It's not a demotion, that's that actual place it got. If you ignore the numbers of the top 5, and then look at the number for the article that placed sixth highest overall - you've numbered it 4. The 4 articles that all shared the 7th best score are all numbered 5. Trust me, this is how all lists like this are done :) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:27, 03 Feb 2009
- Where's the quarterback? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- oh hey guys look! Modus made a joke! =D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 00:32 4 February 2009
- I'm ready, coach. Doc says that my...consuction is...amlost...all...butter! Put me in! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh thanks MO, I totally didn't realise I'd left him out. I added him back, and also anything else I think was missing from before. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:48, 04 Feb 2009
- It's lacking pictures of me beside pages that I wrote. Kudos on the pictures of not-me around the pages that I wasn't involved with, though. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- oh hey guys look! Modus made a joke! =D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 00:32 4 February 2009
I still don't understand...[edit source]
How UnBooks:Tarquin Middleton: My Battle with Depression. got forgotten about, it's by far my favourite thing on the site. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 18:18 2 February 2009