From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Uncyclopedia is almost full
|
Score: 10 editors who did a good job while it lasted.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Z3R0 H0UR 21:09, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 12
|
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:30, 15 December 2010- Self For This was a surprise nom, thank you. I've polished it for a long time, and hope that you have half the fun reading the page as I did carving it. Z3RO HOUR did a very helpful review. Now I must go hit on the blonde. Aleister 00:54 16 12
- In-jokey.. but also believable enough that once a clueless realises what's going on, it should work anyway. 1234 ~
 04:23, 16 December 2010
- For. Jeez --M&M (christmas mood)
 08:22, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
- For Hilarity of epic proportions, especially at his reaction to the "in-joke" references. Z3R0 H0UR
- "For'. Funnybony
   18:01, Dec 16 18:01, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
- For - Hilarious. I'm still in favor of a noob welcome template that says, "Fuck off, we're full." -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 14:14, Dec. 19, 2010
- For -
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 17:50, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Way to go Aleister! I really like this. I looked at the talk page, that is so funny how that guy thought it was real! --
Magic Snow man ☃ 00:41, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes --Dancing dude
  02:19, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Fucking For Actually, this is not too bad after all--If you're 555 then I'm
 Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:45, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
 My checkmark is blue 'cause I'm special. Yeah, that was a good read. → I am greatSoup? 23:58 22-Dec-10 ←
|
Against: 2
|
 Nahh I don't really find this funny. Sorry--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 23:19, December 15, 2010 (UTC)- Against. Great article but not a front page feature on in-jokery grounds.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:04, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. It's ok, but not now. There's too much naval gazing at the moment. Article's about ourselves should be once n a while with a more outward looking approach being the norm for our features. Sorry Aleister Sycamore (Talk) 09:36, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
- See comment below about why now if at all. Murdoch is as old as the hills, and if he "slips on the ice" (or is pushed). . .Aleister 13:35 22 12
|
| Comments
|
- In-jokes are worked into the page, not centerpiecing the article, with many as links. Most of them are meant to provide a link to things like the hundreds of articles in the Hall of Shame, so readers can swim even further out to sea. Aleister 14:12 16 12
- And to be deathly serious, if this page is to be featured sometime it should be now, because who knows how long Rupert Murdoch will live. Also, Uncy's 6th anniversary is coming up - for those who don't know it's January 5th! Aleister 1:14 20 12
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. 
My checkmark is blue 'cause I'm special. Yeah, that was a good read. → 
Nahh I don't really find this funny. Sorry--
