Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia:UnSignpost/20120405

Article: Uncyclopedia:UnSignpost/20120405	Score: 2.5 uses of the word "Xamralco"
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:13, 6 April 2012
For: 9	When's the last time we had ourselves a good joke nom? On an unrelated note, I really enjoyed reading this UnSignpost so I'm nomming it for feature! : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:13, 6 April 2012 For. heuheuheu ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:17, April 6, 2012 (UTC) For. as a "great effort" tap on the back Mattsnow 23:59, April 6, 2012 (UTC) For. No way not to vote for this and call myself a man. A work of art. Aleister 00:20 7-4-'12 For. Mr N 00:33, Apr 7 Wow! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:20, April 7, 2012 (UTC) it's the only one i've ever read all the way through --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 01:27, April 7, 2012 (UTC) I would suck Xamralco's dick. -- 07:19, April 7, 2012 (UTC) For.: All the way, this article is an example of narcissism at its funniest! I love it! I seriously love it! Best UnSignpost yet. Two thumbs up! (I'd give three thumbs up if I could, but I'm not a mutant.) User:Matthlock/sig 21:27, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 6.5	Against. No disrespect to Xamralco, but if an UnSignpost must be featured I'd hope that it is one that actually does what the UnSignpost is meant to do, you know, with the news and whatnot. Just my opinion, I won't self-immolate or anything if it is featured. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:50, April 7, 2012 (UTC) Against. Will self-immolate if featured and set Chiefjustice alight to set an example for his lack of ideological purity. Sycamore (Talk) 09:19, April 7, 2012 (UTC) it can be all good and all, but featuring this is infinitely more stupid than featuring the main page. it's a community newsletter, intendend for a community, not something to stick on the front page. worse than an in-joke 210.168.185.68 14:13, April 7, 2012 (UTC) Against. Not enough Zombiebaron Nominally Humane! 12:45 08 Apr 00:45, April 8, 2012 (UTC) Against. I can't see this as something new or casual visitors would find funny. I can't tell how many in-jokes this is deep, but an expedition to find out is being mounted. -Tritefantastic (talk) 04:04, April 8, 2012 (UTC) Against. --EMC^[TALK]16:12 Apr 9 2012 Against. Navel vanity. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 22:09, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Um... How would we feature this on the front page? It's like... Too wide! Mr N 00:33, Apr 7 Maybe just some of the first column, then the link can jump to the full UnSignpost. Is that doable? Aleister 00:37 7-4-'12 Comment. burble burble ShabiDOO 17:24, April 8, 2012 (UTC)