| Article: Uncyclopedia:UnSignpost/25-11-10
|
Score: -2 misrepresented sysops
|
| Nominated by:
|
~  *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 03:42 (UTC)
|
For: 5
|
- I thought it was funny, anyway... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 03:42 (UTC)
- For. i came nachlader 03:45, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:47, 28 November 2010- For. These are always funny. It's about time one got featured. Funnybony
   09:03, Nov 28 09:03, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. heh David Gerard 17:42, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 7
|
- I haven't seen what's so funny. --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 09:07, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Eh?
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:33, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Nah, signpost for signpost - it's not good enough for a feature. That and too much injokeyness--Sycamore (Talk) 17:44, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not in this one. --
 Roman Dog Bird  18:48, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- It's only as funny as all the other UnSignposts really. --Black Flamingo 19:44, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. per above. Mn-z 20:11, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Against ever featuring a Signpost - that's so not what this is about. Plus it's not as good as any of the ones Gerry wrote. --UU - natter
 09:22, Nov 30
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
*shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 03:42 (UTC)
For. 
