From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Who: My Re-Generation
|
Score: 13 Rocking Timelords
|
| Nominated by:
|
I'mthedaddy 09:13, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 13
|
- Nom and For Because Dr/The Who is/are my favourite TV programme/band. --I'mthedaddy 09:13, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
 YEAAAAHHH! The very end seemed a bit abrupt to me, but otherwise out of this world.                Sir MacMania GUN—[09:39 12 Oct 2009]- For. ChiefjusticeDS 09:45, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For - Epic in the best sense of the word. And ten is quite a high number! mAttlobster. (hello) 11:26, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 14:29, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For - Because if I voted against myself I'd be very confused. --Sog1970 14:43, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Who? —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:41, 12 October 2009
- For. A magic bus for another slice of Soggy humour.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 15:44, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For Who? I Pee Reviewed this, found it a wonderful title and an impossible concept that somehow works anyway. Also at my recommendation the author added my favorite Doctor Who saving-the-world technique of "reversing the polarity." That one phrase really makes the article, don't you think? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 15:49, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For. This is mostly by virtue of sog's writing; I don't know much about The Who or The Doctor to find it as "epic" as others. But I did laugh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 20:44, Oct 12
- For. Loved this when Sog showed it to me a while ago. Still love it. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN20:54, 12 Oct
- For. It's worth his last 15 shillings" Funnybony 12:07, October 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Aye • FreddThe Redd •
 •  •
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
Why?'s pee full of useful advice as usual here. --Sog1970 15:32, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
YEAAAAHHH! The very end seemed a bit abrupt to me, but otherwise out of this world. 
20:26, October 15, 2009 (UTC)