From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Red Dwarf
|
Score: 1 kippers smoked
|
| Nominated by:
|
               Sir MacMania GUN—[07:38 12 Oct 2009]
|
For: 6
|
 Self-nomination and for. User:Funnybony nominated this while it was still in userspace, but now I've angered Mr Flibble and moved this to mainspace before it got a second Review. It did get one before, though. I've also apparently angered Mr Flibble further by not voting properly. Sir MacMania GUN—[07:40 12 Oct 2009]- For. Another brilliant piece of work from MacMania. Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas. ChiefjusticeDS 08:21, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Smeg Yes --Sog1970 09:15, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For. For the 2nd time. "Two times now, Huh huh!"---James Brown. And now it's even better. Funnybony 14:24, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 14:32, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- For.. I was the Pee Reviewer, and rated this a high 37 before some great improvements. Also I am terrified of the wrath of Mr. Flibble. Still, please sneak my favorite R.D. phrase "smeghead" in there somewhere. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 15:38, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:42, 12 October 2009
|
Against: 5
|
- This just seems like a well-written slightly amusing guide to the actual Red Dwarf series. I don't get it. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:18, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Err...I love the series too but where is the new angle to make this particular article a VFH nom ? Otherwise it just reads like a fan piece.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 15:55, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Yeah, I was disappointed by this - I like Mac's work, and I was looking forward to a good spin on Red Dwarf. Instead, this is as Matt says: well written and mildly amusing, but not much more than a series recap. Nice, but it's not going to jump-start the second big bang with jump leads from Starbug. --UU - natter
 17:36, Oct 12
 Self-against because 1) the three people above me are absolutely right, and 2) I'm working on a new spin here. Sir MacMania GUN—[20:04 12 Oct 2009]- Helping the nom die. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 20:34, Oct 12
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. Looks like this is a bit polarising, so Mr Flibble has struck, I guess. Can we get this off of here while I consider some possibilities with this? Personally I read it over again, and the Against people have overwhelmingly valid points. Smeg. Sir MacMania GUN—[19:48 12 Oct 2009]
- OK, working on a new version now. Can we please get this off of VFH? Sir MacMania GUN—[20:04 12 Oct 2009]
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Sir MacMania GUN—[07:38 12 Oct 2009]
Self-nomination 
Self-against because 1) the three people above me are absolutely right, and 2) I'm working on a new spin 
Comment. Looks like this is a bit polarising, so Mr Flibble has struck, I guess. Can we get this off of here while I consider some possibilities with this? Personally I read it over again, and the Against people have overwhelmingly valid points. Smeg. 