From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Occam's Razor
|
Score: 13 entities 
|
| Nominated by:
|
Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 08:56, Apr 7 2010 UTC
|
For: 14
|
 Of course, with review here. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 08:56, Apr 7 2010 UTC- For. Simples also brought the meerkat to my mind, as well. Although I didn't suggest including it in case I got a beating. --Matfen 13:00, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Half-For I like it, but not especially so. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 16:28, Wednesday 07 April 2010
 For! We should {{expand}} concepts like this. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π ~  ~ 08 Apr 2010 ~ 03:50 (UTC)- For. Style
 Guide 13:05, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For A good play on the word and concept. It could be longer for my taste--everything taken to the extreme, that's what turns my key, revs my Bentley, jims my Jimbo. Aleister in Chains 13:21 8 4 MMX
- For. Dangerously smart. ~
 14:53, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- 3/4's For. Following in Eugene's footsteps, I want to make this as simple as possible. Plus I want to see what happens when this gets slapped on the front page. -- Sir SF13 (Talk)
 GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 01:09 EST 9 April, 2010
- • FreddAin't Dedd •
 •  • 12:49 • Friday, 9-04-2010
- 1/6's for. Also am I the only one who thinks that penis mold infers... smallness? --nldr 12:57, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Damn, I cut myself with Occam's Razor. Again. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:51, 9 April 2010
- For. Clever, funny. Nameable • mumble? 10:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Clever. Any longer would ruin the effect, I think. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:58, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I like weird things. M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 02:37, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
Honorary 1/4 Against. can a disambiguation page even be featured? Hmmm, maybe I should Nom a portal... -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 01:09 EST 9 April, 2010
- Stupid Could be much more complex. It doesn't even mention Scrubs. What about Occam's Razor in regards to relationships? Hmm? Nothing is there on it. This is a really crappy way to demonstrate Occams's Razor. It is not good. To put it simply, this shouldn't be featured. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:29, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. I like the progression of the idea but not sure it is a feature. Also 'Simples' is a catchphrase I now associate with Meerkats (see You Tube for the cultural reference).
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:28, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I don't get it at all. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:03, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Of course, with 
For! We should {{
20:45, April 11, 2010 (UTC)