Uncyclopedia:VFH/Microsoft (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Microsoft (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Microsoft	Score: -3 happy BSoD players
Nominated by:	LOLsupreme 09:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
For: 1	For hope you'll like it.--LOLsupreme 09:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Against: 4	Ugh No thank you. -RAHB 10:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Against. Sorry man: it's got too many quotes, it's got too many lists, it's too ranty, there are too many pics, it's quite ugly (largely as a result of too many pics), and when you get past all of that, there's not much left. Get it reviewed, work on it again, then see what happens. --UU - natter 10:21, Jul 1 Against - This article has all the hallmarks of collective editing with no oversight: listcruft, pictures dropped in at random, short sections intended as quick jokes. If it's being cleaned up, it needs more. --Hyperbole 23:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Same as Hyperbole. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:46, Jul 1
Comments	I've added a link to the real entry in the article near the vfh template.The entry in the template is for another nomination of this article.--LOLsupreme 10:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC) You've certainly put a good effort in it, but it still needs some cleanup. Did you consider pee review? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordillo (talk • contribs) I'll certainly consider it in the future,but what is wrong? – Preceding unsigned comment added by LOLsupreme (talk • contribs) Too many pictures, too many lists for a start. ~ 10:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC) OK,is it legal to improve it after the nomination?--LOLsupreme 10:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Another thing,about the vfh template,can the link show the curent nomination and not the old one. --LOLsupreme 10:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC) I've gone ahead and linked the template to the right nomination for you (at this point we don't have a code to do that, so I just copied the code and pasted it in, changing the link). It is legal to improve after nomination, but discouraged, considering we'd be voting on something different during the same nomination. I suggest you improve it afterwards though. It still needs some work. Also, I don't think it's allowed to be here without a Pee Review if you've self-nominated it. Just standard policy. -RAHB 11:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC) It's not self-nominated,just improved,there where even more quotes,the history was rubbish,there where no error images... etc.Thanks for the template. --LOLsupreme 11:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH