Uncyclopedia:VFH/In Confidence We Walk: Upton Sinclair's Keynote Speech to the National Writer's Consortium, 1943

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

In Confidence We Walk: Upton Sinclair's Keynote Speech to the National Writer's Consortium, 1943 (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: In Confidence We Walk: Upton Sinclair's Keynote Speech to the National Writer's Consortium, 1943	Score: 18 wangs dangling from a moving train
Nominated by:	~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 04:10 Feb 22)
For: 18	N♥m && f♥r. This article literally knocked me on my ass. I don't think I've ever actually ROFLed at an article before. But I've got the carpet burns to prove that I did tonight. Thank you, THINKER, for this amazing article. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 04:10 Feb 22) For packed meat -- Since my salary does not depend on my vote I am voting for. Sean.hoyland - tak() 10:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC) For. It's featurable now, but I would very much like to see you make a few of the changes that the reviewer suggested, particularly taking out a few of the annotations, because I feel like they slowed you down a bit. Still, as is it's definitely FA-material. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:57, Feb 22 Dig The annotations are supposed to kind of ebb and flow the article a bit, allowing each portion of the speech to resonate with the audience (and obviously the reader). Because if you imagine yourself in the audience, with a crazy old man giving this speech, I think it'd probably move in this stinted manner. I'll do some reworking if it is really an issue though. Thanks for the current support, folks. :) --THINKER 18:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC) For. Well-written and instructive. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)  For. --MNM5150Talk Dirty To Me Failings 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)  For. - loved it ;) ~Formerly Annoying Crap 06:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:33, Feb. 23, 2008 For My power went out while voting for this. Clearly another way "the man" is keeping us down. -RAHB 06:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC) ! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 08:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC) For. Mmm, it's quite a breezy sensation. (I'm given to understand). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:16, Feb 24 For the vigorous feeling of the wind in my willows. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For Perhaps this will make up for the fact that I recently misspelled Sinclair's name on a history paper. Honestly. How did I do that. --THE 20:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Do you know where you are? You're in the jungle, baby. You're gonna die! Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 05:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Yea-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Kickass --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC) FOR Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 04:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC) For Sinclair did it best.Mightydandylion 00:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---